The text 1,360 ft3 by Wayde Compton suggests that only certain kinds of immigrants are welcome in Vancouver. The “Mystery Migrant” that arrives in Vancouver in a container from Hong Kong, is shown to be completely unwelcome. The public reacts to her presence negatively, sending in letters “depict[ing] her as some sort of terrorist or spy” (18). One letter suggests “she should be stuffed back in the container they found her in, locked up, and sent to Hong Kong with ‘return to sender’ painted on the side” (18). These examples indicate that the first problem Vancouver has with this migrant is her foreignness, which is depicted in several ways.
A difference of race is suggested to be one of the first reasons Vancouver rejects the migrant. As the migrant arrives without a passport or ID, and immigration officers are unable to identify
…show more content…
With the soring real estate prices, any immigrant needs money to purchase a home. An immigrant can still survive in Vancouver without large capital, but the city becomes a hostile place for them to live. Immigrants like the “Mystery Migrant” would struggle to meet their daily living expenses. Likewise gaining money is also hard in Vancouver because any immigrant would also need to meet certain requirements to get a job, such as education, references and/or background in some occupation. Therefore only immigrants that are wealthy or have good jobs are welcome in Vancouver. Otherwise it is difficult to afford to live in Vancouver.
The “Mystery Migrant” is revealed to be a performance, and a Canadian citizen. Her performance highlights the criterion that is needed to be welcome in Vancouver. In order to be truly welcome an immigrant needs to fulfill the requirements of language, legalities, race and wealth. If an immigrant does not meet these requirements Vancouver becomes a more hostile place for them to live, as the city does not support
Many Canadian citizens feel that their government betrayed the Chinese immigrants after the completion of the Trans-Canada railway in the late 19th century. However, Christopher Anderson argues in his article “The Senate and the fight against the 1885 Chinese Immigration Act” that the Canadian senate has never given up on the fight for the preservation of rights deserved by Chinese immigrants. In his article, Anderson depicts statistical data and explains legislatures imposed on the Chinese immigrants to strengthen his argument, and then he attempts to gain the reader’s support through employing a series of ethical and emotional strategies. Anderson begins his article by depicting a “full apology” made by the Canadian Prime Minister in hopes of seeking forgiveness for the restrictions imposed on Chinese immigrants.1 By employing this potent ethos statement, Anderson has already attempted to convince his readers about certain mistakes made by
have no guarantees in Canada” is about migrants from Haiti, Colombia, India, Mexico and Turkey. These migrants either were in the U.S. and fled to Canada or are in the U.S. and trying to flee to Canada. The migrants are fleeing to Canada because they are scared that the U.S. will deport them. In Canada they are finding them a place to live and letting their kids go to school but, there are so many coming in that Canada’s immigration system had to make a domed stadium into a makeshift shelter. Now there is a chance that some of those migrants might be deported in 6 months to a year.
When the Chinese Immigration Act in 1923 came into place, this meant that new immigrants were not allowed to enter the country if it wasn’t under a special circumstance. This split up new families for newly wed young men, and also slowed the community growth of the Chinese community in Canada when they banned Chinese immigrants from entering Canada. Most Chinese men entering Canada were poor, seeking wealth in the Gold Rush and with the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway. After having to pay the head tax, many immigrants
In 2002, Canada followed Homeland Security of United States and came up with an immigration plan. The bill was called “Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.” The focus of the bill was to stop people entering Canada and seeking asylum who will endanger the safety of the Canadians. The bill introduced strict law for people who will try to put the life of Canadians at risk. The law allowed immigration to remove people from the country who may pose a threat to the country.
This article discusses how we are able to analyze recent policy changes from the development of Canada’s immigration policy. The main goal was to understand the objectives of the current policy, how it relates to the economy, and who the policy affects. According to the article, the country’s immigration policy has a history of wanting to use immigration for long and short term goals like economic growth and adjusting to current labor market conditions. Canada’s immigration has drastically changed from what it used to be after abandoning and adopting different concepts. An example would be the “absorptive capacity” concept that was abandoned after realizing it doesn’t truly help the long-term goals it originally was thought to be.
Over the course of a 40-year period in the 20th century, over 1 million immigrants came into Canada through Pier 21 in Halifax. In 2011, immigrants accounted for more than 20% of British Columbia’s population. The first Indian immigrants came to Canada in 1903; the majority of them were brought over as agricultural workers. 100 years later, Indo- Canadians represent 4% of the current population in Canada and Indian immigration to Canada is growing at an unprecedented rate. The changing political and social landscape of Canada, which helped to shape the immigration system, is responsible for the unequaled growth in Immigration to Canada.
In this first issue, Donald Trump's proposal to combat illegal immigrants in America will dilapidate Canada. Illegal immigrants are fleeing America and infiltrating Canada, which creates a bunch of problems for us. For example, Canadian taxpayer’s dollars are being diverted from their intended
Chinese immigrants coming to Canada faced hardship after hardship from the long voyages, the expensive head tax, and the back-breaking jobs they had. It was not an easy journey to get from China to Canada. The Canadian government thought
9. What are the barriers faced by women in accessing justice and services? Canada is the dream destination for many immigrants. Federal government reported, the number of immigrants entering Canada in 2012 were over 250,000 being one of the highest proportion of foreign-born population in any country. Immigrants who enter Canada generally have no understanding or knowledge of the family justice system and face some serious hindrances in gaining access and learning the system, and arguably, the single group of immigrants that face the greatest barriers are immigrant women who are victims of domestic violence.
In the past, Canada 's immigration policy had been discriminatory. Throughout the 20th century, the exclusivity of immigration in our country has evolved positively from the Chinese Exclusion Act, to the Changing Immigration Policy and lastly, the Immigration Act. To begin, the exclusivity of immigration in Canada has changed positively due to the Chinese Exclusion Act. This act is also known as the Chinese Immigration Act was passed in 1923. This act banned all people of Chinese nationality from immigrating to Canada.
Immigrants are mostly forced to leave their countries due to conflicts and constant states of sanctions on them along with continuous fear of death, their options for escapism are very limited. For some people, considering the circumstances that immigrants go through, they find their actions of choosing illegal methods to save themselves and their families as justifiable. They also appreciate Canada’s diversity as it is one of the main fundamentals that Canada is known for, they believe the more people that come from around the world the more culturally rich the country will be. Unlike the other perspective, people who are against immigration detention see immigrants as people who contribute to the economy as equally as anyone else, and they always have the desire to provide their knowledge about different aspects that are directed towards further developing the
The Charter further ensures a democratic society as it guarantees the fundamental rights such as voting rights, mobility rights and equality rights, which contain the protection against discrimination (Margaret, web). The laws successfully develop to balance the rights of the new immigrants and the interests of the Canadian society. On 2001, November 1st, Immigration and Refugee Protection Act was announced as a symbol of forming the Canadian multicultural society. It mainly improved the laws towards refugee determination, family reunification and gained the control over the country borders(Dwight L. Gibson eta·85). As the globalization has become the main stream of the world, Canada has advantages to move towards this goal as an immigration
Bill C-24, the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act is an enactment that amends Canada’s Citizenship Act. It was introduced in February 2014 and became law on June 20th, 2014. This new law changes the core aspects of Canadian citizenship as Chris Alexander, the current Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, announced that citizenship is not a right but a privilege. Bill C-24 redefines the meaning of a Canadian and introduces negative impact to Canadians and applicants. In this paper, I will compare and contrast the former Citizenship Act with the current.
Canada has been letting in refugees from all over the world, especially the refugees from Syria. Tons of these refugees are easily accepted and are not looked at properly. A refugee is someone who have fled their country due to prosecution, war or violence . Refugees in countries that are at war might not have any documents due to the fact that they probably escaped and didn’t have any time to gather their documents. Tons of these people have lost everything that were close to them including family and friends, homes etc.
Canada cannot let itself make the same mistake it made in 1938 when it sent 907 lives to their cruel death in the Holocaust. Without a doubt, Canada should have an open-door policy towards refugees, to stop this global dilemma. The evidence has clearly proven this. The world should be driven at this time to connect individuals and countries to at long last conclude the world crisis that has lasted for far too