In “Nathan Bedford Forrest; A Biography” by Jack Hurst, there are many occurrences of literary and historical contrast. One main occurrences are the contrast of the North and South's’ beliefs of slavery. The other is the contrast of General Nathan Bedford Forrest and General William Tecumseh Sherman and how they chose to fight the war. To begin, a major contrast is obviously the beliefs of both the North and the South. In the biography, the ideas and actions of both sides is equally shown. It is however mostly shown from the southern perspective, as Forrest was a general in that army. The Union believed in equality to all, and that the imprisonment of the African Americans was wrong. They were willing to die for this equality. The biography shows this belief when it says they fought “Like ocean waves against a shore, they ‘would come forward and fall back, rally and [come] forward again, with the like …show more content…
Both men were generals in their respective right, yet they chose to fight in different manors. Gen. Sherman used a tactic known as hard war, or also under the more popular name total war. This being the fight of using any means necessary―including weapons, strategy, and rath―to end a battle and land a crushing blow to the enemy in which no opposing soldier walks away healthy. He did not care much for the others or for honor. He only really cared about the well-being of his own troops, which is indeed admirable. Gen. Bedford Forrest, on the other hand, took a different approach. Mr. Forrest is famed for his quote “‘I finished the war one horse ahead’”. Forrest had no care as to what happened to the enemy, which is likewise to Sherman, yet he cared not for his own soldiers either. His only priority is that he walked off the battlefield with more numbers alive than the other. It is not the most humane, but certainly
On february 11th, Sherman and his men destroyed the railroad depot, and Sent his men in 4 different directions to destroy just about everything in their path, thus starting his “total war” plan. During the September of 1864, a Confederate general by the name of John Bell Hood had to retreat his men as they were being pushed back by Sherman 's men, forcing them to destroy and burn any and all supplies, including food, ammo, and other such things. Sherman had his men leave it to burn, and proceeded to rip through all of Atlanta Georgia, leaving a 60 mile wide path of burning destruction, effectively burning Atlanta to the ground. The reason he did this was because he reasoned the only way to win the war was to break the souths will to fight, and so he did just that.
In Bruce Catton’s article, “Grant and Lee: A study in Contrasts” he contrasts the differences in the ideologies of the north and the south, while comparing the similarities between the generals themselves. To develop the thesis Catton begins by providing historical context on the two generals working out the terms for surrender of the south, this sets the stage for the next few paragraphs contrasting them. When he contrasts the generals he describes their childhoods and then goes on to describe the ideologies they supported. After this, the author compares the similarities between the generals, which tells the reader that despite the fact they lead two opposing factions in the civil war they weren’t so different as people.
Basil Liddell Hart, a military historian, famously announced that Sherman was "the first modern general"(Luc, n.p.). He would later become one of "the most widely renowned of the Union’s military leaders next to U. S. Grant”, even though he was not a career military commander before the war (Luc, n.p.). He later obtained recognition for his exceptional command
Sherman had went to Ulysses S. Grant, his friend. After all this happened Sherman had got permission. Sherman had got all his 60,000 troops together and told them the rules of the march. He had separated the troops into like a pair of wings. There was a left and a right side.
Abraham Lincoln and Nathan Bedford conquered their separate struggles with two methods; words and weapons. These two men are very different, and accomplished two very different goals, but their beginnings were the same. They were both born poor, and had to work their way to the top. Many failures later, (more for Lincoln, it seemed), and the two became very powerful. One of them used his failures for good, and one for bad.
During the civil war of 1864 a military strategy known as Total War was introduced by the Union General, William Tecumseh Sherman. This strategy deeply impacted the south. Most southerners were asked to leave everything behind, including their homes, cities, and town dwellings (Overly). The destruction of millions of dollars worth of property caused a lot of hardship for the south (Overly). Many were left homeless, roaming the streets of their burnt town.
While reading the selected documents for this week, two of them really stood out to me. In the section of Opposition and Northern Disillusionment, I thought that documents 1 and 10 went nicely with one another. In fact, I believe that they are very documents that allow the reader to contrast them in a way with one another. In document 1, it describes President Grant’s disapproval and frustration with how the Southern states are acting. It seems that ever since the end of the war that there has been a ton of violence, violence that is not even necessary, this violence that is tearing apart the Republican party.
In an interview, a Confederate soldier says, "Johnston 's strategy was to take a strong defensive position and waiting for the enemy to attack." On the other side, a Union soldier said, "Sherman
Compare and Contrast Essay between Soldier’s Heart and Red Badge of Courage Some may say that the Soldier’s Heart and The Red Badge of Courage are very similar stories, maybe too similar. The two novellas have some differences in them, but not many. The two stories have many more similarities, enough to make people question whether or not the stories are in fact the same. Even though the two have their differences, the similarities are enough to make people wonder if the author of Soldier’s Heart did not somewhat plagiarize The Red Badge of Courage.
The Civil War was a hard time for the United States. Old men did not fight in the war. In the Civil War “more than 40 percent fell into the eighteen to twenty-one age bracket”. (American Eras 6) War is a frightening time for anyone, but especially frightening for the young men going off to fight other Americans. The North had a distinct advantage over the South with the population “2.5 times larger than that of the South, 22,300,000 to 9,100,000”.
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
During the Great Depression, a time period where the stock market crashed, arose Huey P. Long and Father Coughlin into national prominence. Huey P. Long, a Louisiana native, was a Louisiana Governor from years 1928 to 1932 and United States Senator from 1932 until he was assassinated in 1935. Huey P. Long was known for doing the unthinkable and having outrageous behavior. He was even noted for wearing green pajamas to business and political meetings. Father Coughlin, a native of Canada, was a priest.
In September 1862, a battle was fought in a small town in Maryland. More lives were lost than any other battle or war that the United States has ever experience before or since. This battle had no true winner but it did have consequeses that changed the course of the Civil War. In James M. McPherson’s book Crossroads of Freedom Antietam The Battle That Changed the Course of the Civil War, he shows how small events added up to lead to the Battle of Antietam and ultimately to the North winning the Civil War.
American Civil War historian, James M. McPherson, in his essay How Lincoln Won the War with Metaphors, argues that if the Union and the Confederacy had exchanged presidents the Confederacy might have won the war. He supports his claim by comparing and contrasting Jefferson Davis’s lack of ability to communicate in an uplifting fashion to Abraham Lincoln’s use of figurative language, especially his metaphors that have the persuasive power of concreteness and clarity which everyone understands and by providing numerous examples of Lincolns metaphors. McPherson’s purpose is to demonstrate how Lincoln was a powerful leader due to his ability to communicate in an inspiring way and appeal to the peoples’ emotions through his use of figurative language
While examining a brief clip of the movie film “To Kill A Mockingbird” I recognized that the film consists of several divergences and equivalences. Beforehand, this scene demonstrates a demented dog with rabies that was terrorising the neighborhood. Not to mention, the film should prosperly enhance details comparable to the novel. Furthermore, one imbalance that caught my eye while observing this scene is Calpurnia’s (families maid) role. In addition, one similarity that attracted me is Atticus’s actions.