Natural Selection and its Correlation to Human Diseases Infections pathogens are the strongest forces that act against the human population. As migrations and cultural changes occurred in the past, individuals have become exposed to dangerous new pathogens. Host genetics influences resistance to infectious diseases and contributes to common diseases that show geographical disparities. An understanding of interaction between the host and the pathogen can inform the development of new medicines and therapies for those with infectious diseases. With the use of new “technologies, analytical method and expanding public data resources,” the investigation leads to new insights into the functions and dysfunctions of the human biology due to natural …show more content…
The genomic analyses provide “insights into human evolution and implications for human health” (Karsson, Kwiatkowski, Sabeti 397). To test for signatures of selection, scans are made by statistical tools and by rapidly expanding the genome data sets in multiple human populations. The next-generation sequencing technologies enable generation of whole-genome sequence for analysis and it can detect all variation throughout one’s genome. Next, signatures of positive selection are tested based on the time of selection and whether the variant is standing or new. It can be found with three different signals - uncommonly large allele frequency differences in population, abnormally high frequencies of newly derived variants, and surprisingly extended LD that is caused by rapid increase of frequency from one allele. Cross-species …show more content…
The long history of malaria complicates the test of resistance loci by GWAs. Because the LD is short and variable within populations, casual variants are inadequately tagged by SNP genotyping arrays. Leprosy was widespread in Europe and it rapidly declined after the 16th century. Today, it is a major health concern in India, China, and South America. The genetics differ between populations. The Indian cohort had strong association to the TLR1 gene that protects them against leprosy, which is completely absent in the Han Chinese population and in Indians, but extremely common in Europe. Tuberculosis affects 1/3 of the human population. It is said to have migrated from East Africa 40,000 years ago and have spread as ancient people migrated around the world. A GWAs of tuberculosis susceptibility only found 2 significant associations in a data set of 11 million SNP, and after replication, nearly 23,000 individuals. This shows that M. tuberculosis is more genetically diverse than M. leprae. The strongest signs of HIV resistance are found in the MHC loci; they are enormously positive and balancing selection. MHC variants offered an explanation for 19% of the phenotypic variance, which included a protective regulatory variant that is correlated with the expression of human leukocyte antigen. Individuals who are homozygous for null mutations of FUT2 gene do not secrete antigens and are protected against some
On the other hand, some of the Old World diseases were: hepatitis,
According to Recent and Ongoing Selection in the Human Genome published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information, the human genome appears to be targeted by selection. The researchers estimate that at least 38% of all new amino-acid altering mutations in the human genome are being eliminated by negative selection. As Homo sapiens outlived Homo neanderthalensis, it is a plausible conclusion that genetically humans are more adapted to Earth’s
Later, while researchers decide the human genome to cure resolute maladies, for example, tumor, genuine moral situations are quick confronting humankind. Understanding the Catch 22 to this issue will empower us decide the possibilities of customized prescription. Through the improvement of exploration association, and the utilization of customized pharmacogenomics, "a
Native Americans did not have the antibodies to combat the diseases brought over by the European explorers. Other diseases were measles,
Europe was a vastly populated continent, and had been for centuries. Diseases such as smallpox, measles, whooping cough, chicken pox, bubonic plague, typhus, and malaria (Denevan) were brought into the new world. The new world was not as densely populated as the old, and when the Europeans arrived Natives of the Americas were immune to the diseases and began to
On the other hand, Europeans didn’t have the same effect when they came in contact with these diseases. Exposed to the diseases at an early age, Europeans were mostly to fully immune. With the devastating effects of disease, native culture was starting to change. Persuaded that their native gods have abandoned them, many natives converted to Christianity. Forced by disease, natives usually married relatives that survived the diseases since appropriate partners were scarce.
These childhood illnesses had grown widespread in most regions other than remote villages, killing one fourth to one half of all children before they turned six years old. However, with the notable exception of influenza, survivors carried some level of immunity, and frequently absolute protection, to the majority of these illnesses. Yellow fever and falciparum malaria likewise made their way across the Atlantic from Africa to the Americas. Falciparum malaria is by far the most severe form of that plasmodial infection. These illnesses circulated throughout Native American communities as epidemics in the centuries following 1492.
Diseases such as diphtheria, the bubonic plague, influenza, typhus, and scarlet fever were scattered throughout the New World as the Europeans settled inland. The Native Americans who had little to no resistance against these diseases succumbed. It is estimated around 90% of Native Americans population perished due to the diseases listed above. However the explorers weren’t the sole transmitters these diseases. Critters and livestock like mosquitoes, black rats and chickens that migrated along with the Europeans also carried the bacteria.
The healthier eating habits led to a growth in the population. There were drawbacks, however. Although the New World was the most affected by new diseases, Europe had its fair share. The most widespread disease was syphilis, which sailors brought back from the Americas. Called “the pox,” syphilis spread all throughout Europe and even reached Asia and Africa.
In deeper analysis, Malaria, Yellow Fever, and Smallpox have occurred for over 4,000 years and is known for greatly impacting humans and their history during the Antebellum era. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention highlighted in the beginning of the article, “Malaria became widely recognized in Greece by the 4th century BCE, and it was responsible for the decline of many of the city-state populations”. Since our medical resources weren’t available to individuals during the Antebellum era, they were able to infer when a person contracted malaria by analyzing their blood. They could also tell when individuals caught this said disease because they would show symptoms of fevers every third day, and the releasing of merozoites in our bloodstreams. Towards the end of the Yellow Fever epidemic, over 5000 individuals were dead.
Geographic location helps determine the animal’s availability to domesticate for a civilization. The reason Countries like Europe developed immunity to sickness, was because of how much time they spent interacting with the animals they had domesticated. Other civilizations without domesticated animals couldn’t grow immunity to sickness. This affected a civilization by making them immune to sickness, this helped develop a civilization through ancestry because the immunity would travel through generations. The Spanish and Europeans developed immunity to smallpox because they had domesticated animals and the animals practically lived in their houses, so they were sharing germs all the time.
The Incas did not have diseases before the settlers came because the geography around them only had llamas around. They didn’t have any resistances so they were more susceptible to illnesses. When the Africans were being conquered some scholars believe that 20 million people in North Africa in the Middle Ages died. 95 percent were killed by disease or war; virtually emptied of it’s people. Germs were perhaps the most gruesome force to shape the history of our world.
The difference in the practice of animal domestication played an enormous role in this. “The inhabitants of the Americas, by contrast, had few, if any, domesticated animals, and thus the crowd disease that played such a significant role in other parts of the world were largely unknown.” (Grob, 2002, p. 17). Most of the pathogens that cause such diseases in humans are from common animals and cattle. “…higher levels of animal domestication in the Eastern Hemisphere may have enabled more diseases to pass to humans from animal host.
This means that the Americas were more likely to get these diseases seeing how their bodies are not prepared to defend themselves against them. The Europeans however, had the complete opposite effect. While the Americas population decreased, the European population increased. This is because when the Europeans started trading with the Americas, they could get an influx of valuable crops. In other words, the gaining of more crops meant more food for the population allowing people residing in Europe to eat more and live long healthy lives.
Environmental diversity caused the Homo sapiens to be different from one another since they were on different parts of the world and adapting to different environmental factors. Chapter 2 Summary: 2. Chapter two begins with two descents of the Polynesian group, the Maori and Moirori. Both groups lived in different places, such as the Moirori lived in The Chathams and the Maori lived in New Zealand. The two tribes were two oppositely developed groups, for example the Maori were forceful and mean and killed, but the Moirori handled their problems peacefully.