Merely a child, Nehemiah Griego pleads guilty to the murders of his mother, father, and three siblings. This unlawful homicide has given, Nehemiah, both charges of child abuse, in partake with his younger siblings and murder. Nehemiah is a 15-year-old boy from New Mexico who was said to have been frustrated and annoyed with his mother, which led to the beginning of his killing spree. Although Nehemiah has not further explained the exact reasons for the cause of his delinquent act other than being frustrated with his mother (which may have been the only reason), he admits to killing them one by one without much hesitation. Not only did he admit to killings his family members, but he also admitted how he did so and how he had planned to go on …show more content…
Both guns that he used to kill his family, were guns owned by the household. Griego is said to not have any mental illnesses and proclaim to not have been intoxicated or found with anything in his system. What seems to be the best explanation for this whole case is that the father of Nehemiah, Greg Griego, was a pastor who had a history of being an affiliated gang member. He had numerous arrests from his past and as reported, owned various guns that were placed throughout his household. Due to the fact that Nehemiah’s father was a past gang member, this could provide various reasons to why Nehemiah decided to kill his family members, due to strain and a family structure that seemed to be …show more content…
Both the social learning theory and control theory seem to play a big part in describing why Nehemiah committed his delinquent act. Parental crime plays a role in a juvenile’s delinquent activities, as it provides them with a different view on delinquency. Social learning plays a vital role in this situation as Nehemiah’s father was a part of a gang. Growing up knowing that his father was in a gang and was taught how to use guns at such a young age, provided Nehemiah an alternate route, that route being a delinquent one. If his own father was a criminal, it provided Nehemiah with a choice of being one as well. The social learning theory provided Nehemiah a certain belief on crime which differed from others, since his father engaged in crime as well. Due to his father being in a gang, this is where the control theory comes in. Control theory can explain the cause for his delinquent act due to having a low stake in conformity and not much direct control. Criminal parents are said to be more involved in abusive behavior and not have a strong bond with their children. This can explain how, since Nehemiah had very little stake in conformity, he was more willing to commit his delinquent act. He didn’t have much to lose or possibly didn’t care too much of what he was committing since he didn’t have much direct control or stake in conformity. It seemed that he had
Procedural History: Goetz, defendant, was indicted by a Grand Jury on January 25 1985, for criminal possession of a weapon in third degree, possession the gun during the shooting, two counts for fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, and possession of two other weapons. The Grand Jury also indicted him for attempt to the following, murder, reckless endangerment, and assault. He was dismissed for the charges of attempted murder and those that came from the shooting. On March 27, 1985, a second Grand Jury indicted the defendant for four charges for attempted murder, four charges of assault in first degree, one for reckless endangerment, and one for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree on the grounds that new evidence became
O.J. Simpson Trail of 1995 There are many people that would agree that the O.J. Simpson trail of 1995 was the most talked about court case in the United States. There are large amounts of supporters on both sides of the case. On the night of June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were found death in Nicole's condominium in Brentwood. The prime suspect of the murders was Orenthal James Simpson.
Real Life Monsters Between stories and real life, both worlds are the same, Evil seems to be a big factor on stories, but they usually have a happy ending. Well the only difference about our world itself, not everyone is so lucky. Grendel, a monster who is as cold as ice who terrorized the town by killing and destroying everything in his path . Gary Ridgway a serial killer would lure his victims in by getting there trust and making it seem like he cared in which he didn’t.
The Codes of the Street The world in which we live in is full of violence; impersonal or interpersonal. As a matter of actuality, interpersonal violence is said to inflict havoc every single day to many members of the society. In the article Code of the Streets, written by Elijah Anderson, the daily norms of a certain inner city neighborhood can reinforce the use of violence in one’s social relationships. Additionally, simply living in those neighborhoods puts young people at risk of being affiliated with aggressive behavior.
Alma Puga Criminology Soc-240 The Co-ed Killer “…I really killed my grandmother because I wanted to kill my mom... I had this love-hate complex with my mother that was very hard for me to handle.” “Co-ed Killer” is referred to the serial killer by the name of Edmund Kemper. Edmund was born on December 18, 1948 in Burkbank California. He began his killing career by taking the life of his own grandmother at the age of 15.
1. There are many problems with boot camps (J.Knowles, 2001). 2. Juvenile drug use is increasing in the United States (Oakley, Smith & Jones, 2008). 3.
The Other Wes Moore illustrates the differences in upbringing between two Wes Moores. The differences drastically alter the outcomes of their lives. It is important to analyze the differences between the Wes Moores’ upbringing in order to identify what factors encourage a favorable path. Concepts from the Psychology 1100 Textbook can be used to explain the lives of the two Wes Moores.
There are several Psychological theories that could contribute a path to delinquency. They include psychodynamic theory, the attachment theory, the moral development theory and the behavioral theory just to name a few. In researching information on Eric Smith, I believe he had several underlying issues that contributed to his violent senseless crime against a helpless little boy. I feel the lack of moral development was a huge factor that caused this youth to explode. Eric Smith was 13 years old, in 1993, when he murdered Derrick Robie, a 4-year-old little boy.
Luis Garavito Although many people generally stereotype serial killers as natural born killers, nevertheless, Luis Garavito was molded into a serial killer because of his terrible and troubled childhood. Garavito was a victim of constant sexual and physical abuse from both his father and two male neighbors. Due to these facts it can be inferred that there is a direct correlation between Garavito’s murderous spree and his childhood dilemmas.
In this paper I will be analyzing how living in a stressful, violent, and poverty-ridden environment in combination with racial discrimination can allow residents of that community too develop a “code of the street”, a set of informal rules to abide by. The two theories I will be connecting this matter to, is the social learning theory and social disorganization theory. More often, these street codes and rules are created by young gang members who manage and “run” the neighbourhood and have an influence. It is a requirement for every resident to not only be aware but abide by the rules, it does not matter the age, sex, or colour, but more where that individual resides, at times it may be for survival. Some of the rules in this code are
On April 20, 1999, two disturbed teenage boys Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris began a killing rampage at Columbine High School in the suburban town of Littleton, Colorado. This was considered one of the worst school shootings to occur at that time. In the morning of April 20, before noon, the two juveniles had killed 13 people to include 12 students and 1 teacher; they also wounded another 23 people before turning the guns on themselves. This event would change the theories as to why school shootings would occur. (History)
Social process theory has several subdivisions including: social control theory, social learning theory and social reaction (labeling) theory (will only focus on social control theory). Social control theory insinuates every person has the possibility of becoming a criminal, but most people are influenced by their bonds to society. It contends that individuals obey the law and are less likely to commit crime if they have: learned self-control, attachment (to family, friends, peers, education, etc.), commitment (to school, learning, etc.), involvement (in leisure activities, sports, etc.), and belief (those that are positive). According to social control theory, an individual is more likely to be criminal/deviant if they are detached and alienated (from friends, education, family, etc.),
The Origin of Savagery Where does savagery come from? Are certain people evil from the moment they were born? Why do some people grow up as saints and leaders, while others grow up as killers and thieves? In Lord of the Flies and “Why Boys Become Vicious”, William Golding explains how one’s background and peers are able to affect who we are as people.
We ask a question which came first the peer of the delinquent with selection perspective youth, selects their peers based on their own delinquency or delinquent attitudes. The socialization perspective with peer influence involvement attitudes and what are possible relationships criminal associations criminal definitions which lead to crime. This is a macro level theory on
Two theories that can be compared are the Social Learning Theory and the Labeling Theory. When comparing these two theories we can use the juvenile crime of stealing to see how the theories are similar and different. The social learning theory basically states that crime like other behaviors is learned. The other theory, labeling states that certain things or children aren’t necessary deviant until society labels them as so. These two theories also have positives and negatives pertaining to how effective they are in the causes of juvenile delinquent behavior.