The word euthanasia originated from the Greeks early 17th century Eu meaning (good) and Thanatosis meaning (death) the word means "Good Death, or a "Gentle and Easy Death”. Many interesting topics are brought upon worldwide, but one of the most controversial topics is the legalization of euthanasia. The definition of euthanasia nowadays is the act of painlessly ending a person’s life from a painful and incurable disease. Many terminally ill patients who unfortunately do not have the privilege to recover from their deadly disease wish to practice euthanasia or physician assisted suicide to alleviate their suffering but, in some countries the law prohibits doctors from doing so leaving them with no choice but to continue living a painful life. …show more content…
He argues in his article “Mercy Death Risks Are Far Too Great” that as a patient who is suffering from a disease he feels like euthanasia advocates are telling them that they are lacking dignity and have such a poor quality of life that their life is not worth living. Flippini also argues that he felt objected when he received a letter from his health insurer telling him how much it costs them to maintain his health care. He dreaded receiving that letter because it would only make him feel bad as a person. He says that patients can feel like a burden to their family members if euthanasia was an option. Flippini states that instead of wasting time and effort trying to legalize euthanasia and making ill patients feel like a burden, and that their lives are not worth anything. They should instead provide better palliative care services aimed at managing symptoms and making the ill comfortable especially as they approach death that way that could help the ill live more fully with the dying …show more content…
According to the article “Religious Groups’ Views on End-of-Life Issues.” The Roman Catholic Church strongly opposes physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. The church believes that life should not be ended that way because it is a gift from god. It is not our decision to decide when we end our lives, it’s a decision of our “creator”. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church) also opposes physician assisted suicide and euthanasia they believe that taking one’s life violates gods commandments and his plans for each person. However, they do believe that when a person is dying it is acceptable to forgo extraordinary therapies, treatments if it is okay with the family members. They should not feel obligated to extend their life by means that are unreasonable to them. The Buddhist religion also oppose to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia they are taught to have a great respect for life. However, they believe that life does not have to be preserved at all times especially if a person is dying. Meaning that if a terminally ill person wants to refuse treatment at any time they could do so. A lot of other religions do not accept physician assisted suicide or euthanasia they believe that it is truly wrong. A religion that actually supports it is the United Church of Christ they believe that terminally ill patients should
There are many religions that are against euthanasia. Muslims believe that euthanasia is an act of killing, which is a sin and forbidden in Islam. (al-Qaradawi, 2005) The Holy Quran does not state a person has the right to die because Allah, God, decides how long people live. (Aramesh and Shadi, 2007)
The United Methodist Church states, “Every person has the right to die with dignity.” The United Church of Christ states, “It’s the right of individuals to not have their lives unnecessarily prolonged.” However, the Lutheran Church Missouri, Synod addresses the matter of physician assisted suicide and condemn it as an “affront to the Lord who gives life,” which also, “open the door for future abuse” ("Suicide."
The religious tradition that I feel best states my views on euthanasia is Christianity. I am a Christian and I believe that God gives life to people, so he should be the one to decide whether someone is going to live or die. For example, if I have a friend and he/she gives me a gift, I used to like the gift but after a couple of years I don't like the gift anymore or don't want it anymore because the gift is no longer what it used to be. I should never throw the gift even if I don't like it anymore because I know my friend is going to be mad about it. My friend would think that I am a bad friend for throwing the gift away.
B. As she and her husband were devout Catholics, they also believed that it was wrong to take away someone’s life and also agreed with the church that doctors should never hasten death. 1. In fact, most religions condemn killing and therefore oppose assisted suicide firmly.
Buddhists are unsupportive of euthanasia and assisted suicide as they contain strong beliefs towards the moral value of human life. If someone is suffering from mental or physical distress, Buddhists insist that it is morally wrong to end their life because it is considered disrespectful to the life that was created (Keown). Catholics are highly against the use of euthanasia and assisted suicide as they believe that God is the only one capable of ending ones life and that life is a beautiful gift that should not be cut short by another human being. However, the church does acknowledge that someone suffering from an illness has the option to refuse life prolonging treatment that will only stretch the life span for a minuscule amount of time. Within the Hindu religion, there are no set regulations regarding euthanasia, although it is said that ending a life early can negatively impact ones karma as the suffering one is enduring is due to an occurrence from the past (Nimbalkar).
Their argument is that the medical practice of physician-assisted death is unethical because it violates the bioethical principle of nonmaleficence, which refers to the obligation of the physician to not cause needless harm. Physician-assisted death is not causing needless harm because the patient themselves is requesting the death-dealing medication and taking them, or not taking them, when, and if, they feel ready to die. It would be needless harm if the physician in question actively euthanatized the patient by administering the death-dealing medications without the patient’s consent. However, from a legal standpoint, physician-assisted death does not include active euthanasia, which is illegal in all fifty states; it simply requires the physician to provide the mentally competent patient with the information they asked for regarding the process and a prescription for the death dealing medication. The physician is not causing needless harm to a terminally ill patient who wishes to die mercifully on their own time instead of six months down the line in possible pain and suffering.
As Christian myself, physician assisted suicide goes against principles of the bible. Christians are taught that our life serves a higher purpose, from the instant we are born til the
“Legislation that allows people to end their lives automatically creates incentives to seek death as a cost-saving option. The elderly and infirm are seen as burdens and can easily be disposed of. Suicide becomes the easy way out.” (Ben Broussard) Most of the time physicians are against the idea of physician assisted suicide because it goes against their job description and personal beliefs.
They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer"("Top 10 Pros and Cons Should euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide be legal?" ProCon.org. ) Another reason against Euthanasia is "the patient might recover against all odds. The diagnosis might be wrong." (Nordqvist, Christian. "
Historically, as in ancient Greek and Roman times, euthanasia and physician assisted death (EAS), in all forms, were not only regularly practiced, they were quite common among all classes (Ian Dowbiggin N. pag.). Hippocrates developed The Hippocratic Oath at around 300 B.C. and included the passage that physicians should not perform EAS even when asked. It took until the Christian movement for this to become the preferred method for practicing medicine. Euthanasia and physician assisted death are becoming more accepted in modern times, once again.
Imagine having to endure so much pain and suffering for a majority of your life that you would just want it all to end. Well, there is a way one can stop their own pain and suffering and it is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The act may only be done solely to those diagnosed with terminal illnesses such as cancer, aids, and heart disease. Many people agree with the idea of euthanasia as it can help those who are suffering be stripped of all the pain they are enduring.
Firstly, I agree that someone should have the option to end their life when there aren't any other alternatives. As mentioned in the sixth commandment; 'thou shall not kill' is taught among all Catholic preachers to preserve our life. Life is a gift from God, not something to be tampered with. This also relates to the same viewpoint of Muslim, Buddhism, Shinto, Islam, Christianity and many more beliefs. They all share the same perspective of the Catholics on Euthanasia.
When the person dies, all pain and suffering he or she was feeling ends. There are a lot of moral issues that come along with the idea of euthanasia. It seems as though a lot of humans today view euthanasia as a selfish way out, similar to the views on suicide. In James Rachels’ book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, he says that euthanasia goes against “the dominant moral tradition in our culture. That tradition is Christianity” (2012, p. 100).
Terminally ill patients have right to die through refusal of medication such as withdrawing a respirator and refusing food and water until dying in about ten to twelve days because of their religion. Being a Christian has a lot to deal with this, especially physicians because the tradition doesn’t allow murder and that only god decides what to give and what to take. It’s hard for them to take their own life because of their own religion. Christianity has a role in both patients and
An article focused on Euthanasia (Perez, 2008) states that as believers of God, we should not accept Euthanasia because it is immoral and unethical. It is not right to accept Euthanasia since we are Christians and according to what God said, we should promote life. According to the leader of the Church, Euthanasia should be prevented at all cost. Even though Euthanasia has advantages, we should think first that who gave us the life we had?