Alex Kinsler Professor Pacholl US History I (to 1865) Section 01G Spring 2018 17 February 2018 Debate Over Taxation and Representation The colonists against Parliament was a true tug of war where each side were trading blows like two heavyweight boxers. British Parliament did not want the colonists to move westward to a new land, and thus created a border among the Appalachian Mountains, which angered the colonists. The colonists wanted to further abroad their land. Stemming from that occurrence was The Sugar Act, Tea Act, and Stamp Act. Colonists were eventually able to persuade the Parliament to repeal The Stamp Act, but to make up for that and to exert their dominance over the colonies, the Parliament came up with a new Act which was the Declaratory Act, written in early 1766. The Parliament created this to make sure the colonists knew …show more content…
In the first sentence of the article, “Objections to the Taxation of our American Colonies by the Legislature of Great Britain Briefly Considered,” Jenyns says the right to tax the colonies is “indisputably clear” and later says “The liberty on an Englishman cannot mean that is, an exemption of from taxes imposed by the authority of the Parliament of Great Britain. Likewise, his counterpart Johnson in “Taxation no Tyranny” says “A tax is a payment, exacted by authority, from part of the community, for the benefit of a whole.” These articles are written from a very strong British stand point that clearly states the British Parliament felt as though it was their right to govern over the
The Declaratory Act was a huge is an example of the lack of freedom that they had while under British rule. It establish that the Parliament had the right to pass laws for the colonies, which was a major reminder that the Parliament believed to be much more superior, and didn’t care as to what rights they were violating because in their view, the colonists didn’t have any. The framers learned that an authoritarian
To illustrate the War; Taxation without Representation was a huge cause for the wars they had bag in the 1700s. The colonists decided they would try to make England suffer by dumping the tea into the Boston Harbor. This was called the Boston Tea Party; the colonists were very upset about the Taxation without Representation, which meant they had no say where their money went. After this the king of England was very upset, and there were consequences for what the colonists did.
The Stamp Act The Stamp Act was a tax placed on the American colonies by the British in 1765. It said they had to pay a tax on all sorts of printed materials such as newspapers, magazines and legal documents. It was called the Stamp Act because the colonies were supposed to buy paper from Britain. The items bought had to have an official stamp on it that showed they had paid the tax. No Representation The colonists
Merited by the Stamp Act Congress being established, the Declaratory Act of 1776 was passed. From the colonists point of view, this was a horrendous act that treated the colonists as if they were the slaves of the Parliament; however from the Parliaments point of view, this was just another way to help control the uprising colonies, where if not contained may rebel against their
“For if our Trade may be taxed, why not our Lands? Why not the Produce of our Lands & everything we possess or make use of? This we apprehend annihilates our Charter Right to govern & tax ourselves. It strikes at our British privileges, which as we have never forfeited them, we hold in common with
At the conclusion of the French and Indian wars the British government was in debt for having to finance such an expensive war, and felt that since the war took place in the colonies and for their defense the colonists should pay the debit in the form of taxes. This is a perfectly reasonable argument on their part however what parliament failed to do was give the colony a say in the matter, and did not take into account that the restrictions, and taxes sugar, molasses, and paper aka the Townsend acts they implemented would make making a profit in the colonels virtually impossible, and violated the colonist’s Natural rights. Some of the great thinkers of the time believed that the government had a moral obligation to treat its citizens fairly,
I believe the British had the right to tax the American colonies because they were British territories, received protection from the British Army, and the people who lived there were considered British subjects. While the colonists were unrepresented in Parliament, the laws of Great Britain were clear that the taxation of the American Colonies was completely legal and well warranted. Up until the 1760’s the colonist had enjoyed tax-free living. However, in Great Britain the subjects there were under heavy tax burdens because of the ongoing Seven Years’ War in North America. To cover the cost of the war and the army in the Colonies, the British Parliament passed tax acts on the colonies.
In debate Darla Davis discusses the Taxes imposed on the American Colonists by Parliament. First not everyone in parliament believe that taxation of the colonies was right thing to do. According to Darla’s Article, Will Pitt and Edmund Burke, were two members of the parliament that under stood why the colonist were opposing the tax. Colonist were opposing men felt that the opposition from the colonists concerning the taxes existed, because the colonist had been practically ignored by England since having been established.
Debate Over Taxation and Representation In the beginning the relationship between the colonies and Britain was amicable. The colonies governed themselves but still remained loyal to Britain. They had a working system of the colonies providing goods to trade with Britain and only Britain while Britain provided protection from other nations interested in colonizing the Americas. This changed after the French and Indian War.
The King of Great Britain was also imposing taxes without the consent of the people in the Americas and thus it angered the colonists. The Constitution fixed this grievance from the Declaration by stating that the Congress was the only ones with the power to collect taxes from the colonists and since they were people elected, the people had a voice to say whether or not they were paying taxes. King George III of Great Britain decided that he would destroy all trading with the colonists and the members of congress came up with the idea that they would have the only power to regulate the trading. This also brought along the ever popular saying, “taxation without representation”. When it comes to the military powers, they were also deemed to be unfair and this grievance needed to be addressed by
They were passed to establish to them who was in charge, which would not go over well. These Acts were done in revolt to the Boston Tea Party, when men dumped ship loads of tea into the Harbor. The acts were: Boston Harbor would be closed, with no ships coming in or out. No town meetings were to be called unless by the governor which was called the Massachusetts Government Act, basically terminating the colonies self government. This was directly violating what was stated in the colonial charter- the right to self govern.
American officials saw the empire as a correlation of equals in which free colonists abroad had the equivalent rights as Britons at home. However, the British government and its appointed representatives in America viewed the empire as a structure of unequal pieces in which various rules governed different areas, and all were subject to the power of Parliament. Numerous colonists claimed that Britain had no right to tax them at all, for Americans were unrepresented in the House of Commons. Britain justified taxation by declaring that they needed a supreme legislature, to which all other controls must be secondary.
Parliament would 've avoided the revolution if the gave the colonists representation. In the 1770s in Boston, the British have been giving taxes for money; in the Stamp Acts, Super Acts, and the Townshend Acts. However there was a group called the Sons and Daughters of Liberty who refuse to follow the British laws and try to bring the government down for unfair taxes. The colonists couldn 't rebel because they weren 't part of Parliament, so they had a famous slogan, "No taxation without Representation". That meant that if the colonists don 't get they way, then they will rebel and continue to break British law.
“The history of present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations [unlawful seizures], all having in direct object the establishments of an absolute Tyranny over these States. ”(Document E). The British taxed just about anything they could; like tea, paper, legal documents, and stamps “Committees are appointed into the characters and conduct of every tradesman, to prevent them selling tea or buying British manufactures. ”(Document I) The British were taxing the American colonists to pay what Britain lost in the French and Indian war.
During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”