Odyssey Rhetorical Analysis Essay

708 Words3 Pages

Recognizing the enormity of conflict can often be difficult. In lines 41-73 of Book 22 of the Odyssey, Homer uses diction and juxtaposition of language to contrast the calm and flattery tone of Eurymachus with the harsh and stark tone of Odysseus, and to illustrate the magnitude of the conflict, as well as dialogue to illuminate conflict between the suitors and Odysseus. Homer utilizes these literary techniques to underscore the tension between the characters in the passage. Book 22 begins with Odysseus confronting the suitors about his dismay at them for occupying his palace with Penelope while he departed. Eurymachus then uses a calm tone full of flattery in an attempt to mitigate the conflict with Odysseus. Not knowing the extent of Odyssues’ rage, Eurymachus proposed a resolution …show more content…

Each of us will pay full measure too.” (Book XXII, 441) The tone of Eurymachus shows his eagerness to reach a resolution with Odysseus, even if it would involve compromise on his behalf. Since Eurymachus and the other suitors fear a battle with Odysseus, Eurymachus has to use a friendly and respectful tone while addressing Odysseus. Additionally, the diction of the quote displays the extent to which Eurymachus is willing to compromise, through the phrases, “Covering all we ate and drank inside your halls,” and “Each of us will pay full measure too.” (Book XXII, 441) Eurymachus is willing to compromise completely with Odysseus in order to reach a peaceful resolution for everyone. The wording indicates full compromise on the behalf of Eurymachus and the suitors. However, Eurymachus’ attempts to avoid conflict would not help. Odysseus becomes enraged at Eurymachus’ calm tone about the conflict. He then counters firmly, “No, Eurymachus, not if you paid me all your father’s wealth, all you possess now, and all you could pour in

Open Document