In 1971, Dr. Phillip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment in which he recruited normal young men who were college students and drastically changed their environment in order to show what the desire for obedience can do to a person’s sense of civil responsibility. The cruel acts committed at Abu Ghraib blurred the lines between the prisoners and the guards because the prisoners were stripped away of their freedom and their human rights. The prison at Abu Ghraib was originally used by Sadaam Hussein to torture and execute political prisoners . The Stanford Prison Experiment puts prisoners against each other in a prison environment in order to access how far human beings are willing go in order to be obedient . Philip Zimbardo …show more content…
In each instance, these honorable members of society were obedient to a new set of rules and the results were tragic. During his experiment, Zimbardo discovered that the men who played the role of guards were told to keep order in the prison. They did as they were told as many people would do. The guards kept the inmates in line by using evil looks and intimidating tactics. As the experiment progressed , the guards became extremely hostile, degrading the inmates and humiliating and tormenting them using psychologically . Even Zimbardo himself got irritated at one point during the experiment. The inmates behaved in the same way, becoming more concerned about keeping the peace rather than treating each other with respect. American soldiers tortured and humiliated prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison The inhumane acts against these prisoners were exposed to the world. The fallout from these events was tremendous and people everywhere were disgusted by the cruel acts that that were inflicted upon the Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib at the hands of American soldiers in the name of …show more content…
The guards and soldiers got so carried away with their position of power that they lost sight of what their job really were. The students involved in the experiment started behaving in the same way because they thought that they were really in prison and that they were not informed that it was still an experiment. The isolation caused the groups to develop an us against the world mentality which led them to believe that no one would understand what they were going through except for the other members of the communities. A while after the experiment, a prisoner was asked about his experience during the experiment and was asked to discuss on his time in solitary confinement. He talks about how he lost his identity and how he became just another prisoner at the time. Zimbardo compared this prisoner's response to an actual prison inmate that had just been let out of prison. Their responses were very similar, both describing the loss of pride and humanity for the actions which put them in prison in the first place. People around the world were applaud after they heard what happened to the prisoners at Abu Ghraib. During his research Zimbardo concluded that , the need to conform and be obedient to authority figures can produce serious consequences. The
The experiment took place at Stanford University in August of 1971 in the basement of the psychology department. The Stanford prison experiment wanted to explore the adverse effects that oppression from prison guards would have on
They set out to create an experiment where they would become prisoners or prison guards. Zimbardo was interested in investigating further variables which explained human behavior. Researchers wanted to see how participants would survive in the prison environment. In one interview Zimbardo asked the question, if put in a bad place would an individual's goodness triumph? The researchers set up a mock prison where 24 undergraduate students would play the roles of prisoners and prison guards.
Some of the guards that were interviewed later, straight up told the interviewer that they wished that they had never participated in the experiment, and if they could go back they would change what they had done. This does not matter in the end though does it? It happened and is it not a lesson that should have been taught to cope with the wrongs that you have done, and move on and try to better yourself. It is interesting that in most cases, the guards were more like the true inmates in actual prisons than they ever believed themselves to
With the guards becoming crueler, it pushed the prisoners to pursue the role as a real-life prisoner. The prisoners began to feel humiliated by the guards and mentally harassed. One became so depressed that he had so much rage with uncontrollable crying, he was set free from the experiment (627). The guards would taunt the prisoners by singling them out because they would beg for it and they simply did not see eye to eye. As the hours passed, new emotions were being found within the prisoners and guards as this experiment was being conducted.
Through the horrible torture and humiliation that the victims endured at Abu Ghraib, Americans expressed their anger towards the Muslim race through abuse and torture. As ] we sit comfortable in our homes watching TV, playing video games, relaxing, there are people who are having severe pain inflicted upon them in prisons in the Middle East, one of the worst of these prisons being Abu Ghraib. Abu Ghraib is a prison that is located on 280 acres of land twenty miles west of Baghdad that was shut down in April of 2014 (CNN). The CIA committed many acts of human rights violations in Abu Ghraib that included very inhuman methods of torture. Prior to 2003 the prison was used for detention purposes and did not have the level of inhuman acts going on as it did after 2003 till its close date.
In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves
The guards that did not agree personally to the torturing of prisoners, but obeyed anyway, were participating in the act of Submissive Obedience, because the conscience they obeyed was not their own. The guards actions can also be explained by Philip G. Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment”. In Zimbardo’s experiment, many young men were given absolute power as guards over prisoners, much like the soldiers at Abu Ghraib. After given few directives and told to enforce the laws of the prison, the guards at the Stanford Prison took only 3 days to
This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.
They also concluded that the environment of the prison played a vital role in the way the guards treated the prisoners. It is believed that this experiment changed the way some U.S. prisons are
These series of events seemed to bring out the worst in both prisoners and guards. Prisoners were losing all sense of personal identity after being referred to as numbers and not personal names this made them feel less important and they successfully believed it to be true. After six intense days of Phillip Zimbardo’s conforming to social roles experiment a graduate student who was only there to take notes and interview was so shocked by what she saw she demanded the experiment end straight away as it was degrading to watch and degrading for all who took part as Phillip Zimbardo and his team watched the situation descend into chaos she was only the voice that spoke up about how bad the experiment truly
Within both of these facilities, some type of torture was done. This is one of the huge factors. Both Stanford and Abu Ghraib used psychological tactics, small amount of mental torture such as non-physical which later escalated to physical and deadly torture. Even though Stanford Prisons never escalated to physical damage, torture was a major factor in both facilities. Prisoners in Abu Ghraib and case studies in the Stanford prison experiment both experienced humiliated.
The results are still relevant today where many prisons still have dehumanizing conditions and high re-entry rates. Personally the outcome of the Stanford Prison Experiment made the event of Abu Ghraib all the more shocking since they bear striking similarity and reveal that as a society we still have not learned all that can be learned from this experiment. References Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973). A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Research Review, 30, 4-17.
Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.
Zimbardos team has an orientation the day before the expirement began. In the orientation was stated the following, you cannot harm physically any of the prisoners, you cannot withhold any food or drink from them. In some of the footage from the real thing, professor Zimbardo was seen talking to the guards. Zimbardo wanted the expirement to work at the maximum result. He explained to the guards that they had complete control of them, and that the prisoners were completely defenseless.
Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.