To evaluate the offender 's risk level and provide effective treatment for this individual, I would collect as much information about the offender as possible by reviewing case records and conducting observations, interviews, background checks, and a formal evaluation (CITE, 418?). I would use the risk and need scale provided by The Level of Service Inventory-Revised to assess the offender 's criminogenic needs along ten domains, including: personality characteristics, pro-criminal attitudes, substance abuse, and family and marital history. There are several other assessment tools that would be useful throughout the process of evaluation: the PCL-R, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, the Historical, Clinical, and the Risk Management Scale. …show more content…
Next, I would use the big four to assess the convicts antisocial history and look for indicators of antisocial personality pattern through criminal attitudes, impulsiveness, aggression, poor problem solving skills, and psychotic symptoms. I would evaluate the offender 's values, beliefs, and rationalizations for indication of antisocial cognitions that support crime. Furthermore, I would look for antisocial associates that encourage participation in criminal behavior. Through the central eight risk factors, I would collect information regarding the individual 's family and marital circumstances to see if antisocial behavior is rejected or supported. To evaluate the individual 's quality of relationships and performance within social settings, I can look to school and vocation circumstances. I would also consider the offender 's involvement in anti-criminal leisure and recreational activities and look for evidence of …show more content…
Before intervening through treatment, I need to know if I am working with a special population (substance-abuse offenders, violent offenders, psychopaths, sex offenders, and women) so that I can correctly adjust treatment to meet their needs. Moreover, I need to be aware of the cultural norms of the offender to form a respectful therapeutic alliance. Since the prison is run by the state or federal government, I need to consider that although I work with the prisoners, I work for the prison and the facility is my true client. Therefore, I should remember that the convict may lack trust in me, as a therapist, and may show restrictions participating in therapy because they might see me as an instrument of the court or law enforcement. For a successful rehabilitative program, Andrews and Bonta advocate that the program must "respect the individual, have a psychological theory basis, and should work in junction with the enhancement of preventative service" (YEAR). I would employ cognitive-behavioral therapy because it has shown the most success in various treatment settings (CITE, 423?). CBT aligns with Andrews and Bonta 's RNR model by focusing on the reduction of criminogenic needs. CBT therapy seeks to change the CENTRAL beliefs of the individual 's behavior and incorporates problem solving skills, interpersonal skills training, role-playing, and negotiation skills training (CITE 423 ish). If possible, I would encourage the offender to participate in group therapy in
The question asked to analyze what characteristics does the offender had; whether offender had any criminal background, family history of crime, ethnicity, age, gender
Individuals who score high of the PCL-R have limited range of depth feelings, meaning that psychopaths usually do not feel depressed. In fact, individuals who had suicidal tendencies tend to score lower in the “shallow affect” symptom. On the hand, PCL-R Factor 2 focused on the antisocial factor which indicates whether the individual has violated norms or laws. Some symptoms include early behavioral problems, lack of realistic goals, irresponsible, juvenile delinquency, early behavioral problems, etc. Dixon Jr may have scored higher in Factor 2 due to his juvenile delinquency record and his aggression towards the inmates during the beginning of his sentencing.
Based on the seriousness of the offense and prior convictions, offenders are placed into one of the five categories listed in the guidelines (no/minor record, moderate record, serious record, violent or repetitive record, or serious violent record). To place a defendant into a criminal history group: the defendant's prior convictions must be grouped by arraignment date into criminal incidents, using the master crime list, "assign an offense seriousness level to each criminal incident based on the most serious offense of conviction", record the number of criminal incidents at the offense seriousness level, and finally assign the defendant the most appropriate criminal history category. Similar to the seriousness of the offense, the judge must also take into consideration different factors. The first factor is the defendant's prior convictions/staircasing. The second factor is to take into account multiple incidents.
Offender profiling is used by focusing on all the aspects of the crime. They investigate the nature of the crime, the scene and how the crime was committed. The goal of this type of profiling is to provide investigators with an idea of the personality of the suspect. This method of profiling has in part been effective. By suing this type of profiling methods, investigators were able to arrest the responsible for the individual that terrorized New York from 1940 to 1956, The Mad Bomber.
Similarly, specialty court recidivism research needs to do the same. This prompted the authors to measure specialty court’s influence on clients who did not complete the program. This data is and should be required to determine specialty court’s efficacy. This approach to measure unsuccessful clients is essential and should not be discarded. The authors measured other factors besides recidivism, time to recidivism, and drug use.
Jails and prisons have a greater responsibility that incapacitation. The focus should be placed on factors that the most significant factors that are attributed to criminal conduct. After the determination of the risks of the offender, the focus should be placed on factors that are the most important influences that are attributed to criminal conduct. Many issues may be considered a factor; however, priority should be put on those that are known to reduce recidivism. According to O'Riordan and O'Connell (2014), personality factors are much more linked to a crime that socio-economical class (98).
look for abnormalities in the individual's personality, thought processes, or belief structure as explanations for criminal behavior (Aebi, 2014). We're all familiar with the insanity defense, which is the idea that an individual is not responsible for his or her behavior because of a mental disease or defect that prevents the person from controlling their behavior and/or understanding the difference between right and wrong. This is based in part on the idea that psychological factors are related to behavior in general, which is in turn linked with deviance and potentially with criminality as well. Who would be considered a predicted criminal and to what level? The prediction of criminal behavior is one of the most central activities of the
While a few theories are not as regular, others have developed and are utilized as a part of numerous criminal reviews today. Cutting edge criminologists consolidate the most important aspects of sociology, psychology, anthropology, and biological theories to advance their comprehension of criminal behavior. Rational choice theory, psychological, biological, and strain theory are used to analyze the
It is also mentioned that the suspect is likely a very antisocial person who does not come into
A therapist ONLY addressing an offender 's mental illness may be problematic because offenders have criminogenic needs that need to be treated in order to reduce criminal behavior. The Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model of corrections and rehabilitation was designed by Andrews, Honta, and Hoge in 1990. This model has demonstrated the strongest research-support on its ability to explain and treat criminal behavior. Andrews and Bonta have shown that in order to produce a successful rehabilitation program, the program must "respect the individual, have a psychological theory basis, and should work in junction with the enhancement of preventative services". This model reveals the importance of going beyond ONLY addressing an offender 's mental illness and providing treatment relevant to
According to Department of corrections and rehabilitation there is approximately 2.3 million adult offenders currently detained and which consist of 316,229 prisoners which are overseen by correctional officers on an ongoing basis costing on an average of $49 per prisoner, additionally their current budget is approximately $11 billion, which is distributed between 33 state prisons, 40 camps, as well as 12 community correctional facilities. Furthermore, the male population is 93%, 7% are females, Hispanics represent 39%, 29% are African American, and 26% are Caucasian, moreover, there are 24,000 inmates currently serving life sentences and 680 on death row, as well as the 124,000 parolees of which there is a 51% return ratio for parole violations, thus resulting in prison over-crowding.
Overview Recidivism in sex offenders returning to the community consistently remains a constant concern for society. Recent studies have directed in the direction of guidelines for professionals evaluating sex offenders with exclusive attention on identifying sexual recidivism as a whole. Clinicians must approach sex offender testing with caution; there is not an exact method of predicting sexually deviant behavior with 100 percent accuracy. However, multiple assessments have demonstrated the ability to identify and predict erotic deviant behavior (DeClue & Zavodny, 2014).
"...many clients who participate in treatment do so without absolute voluntariness, as they may be encouraged to do so by family, friends, or the legal system" (Terry, 2013, p. 266). Voluntariness is based on the matter of degree, as one researcher claimed that prisons are not really in a position to exercise their freedom and be able to choose freely. This demonstrates how the factor of voluntariness concerning treatment is somewhat insignificant. Those who frequently believe treatment for sex offenders to be unethical bring up the fact that it is an involuntary act. For instance, participating in a treatment program and being offered more lenient sentences as an incentive.
This approach also prevents overcrowding in prisons because it also deals with rehabilitative
The correctional system uses rehabilitation for offenders who were convicted on a juvenile level. Many inmates have serious mental illnesses, some in which require rehabilitation while incarcerated and some who only need rehabilitation to sustain. There is a great difference between punishment and restraint and rehabilitation is a restraint that always an offender to get better if mentally unstable rather than making them feel punished for an act that may not have been intentionally committed. People learn by example, whether it is a child or an adult, even those in prison. The main purpose for a prison is to restrain those who are violent from placing themselves at harm or others, while helping them change their behavior from negative thoughts and acts to positive and nonviolent so that they can return to the