Operant conditioning is an important process that affects the way humans behave. Operant conditioning is one of those things that happens, but you just don’t know the name of it. According to Myers and DeWall, “In operant conditioning, organisms associate their own actions with consequences. Actions followed by reinforcers increase; those followed by punishments often decrease”(p.290). Which means that operant conditioning is the relationship between your behavior, and the consequences that come from it. The process of operant behavior happens throughout our whole lifetime. This process is extremely important when disciplining our children because to shape a child into behaving good we have to show them the consequences of good behavior. “In …show more content…
A child starts to learn from the moment they are born. Our brains never stop processing the events happening around us. Since children are constantly processing everything going on around them, parents have to be careful what they do and say around and to their children. Parents have to chose how to behave in front of their kids because whatever they do affects them. Physical punishment is a positive punishment in the operant conditioning process. Physical punishment is ineffective in the operant conditioning process because your child will learn the act of hitting when he or she doesn’t get their way. “First, physical punishment generly, and spanking specifically, are ineffective at improving children’s behavior and, in fact, lead to a worsening of it over time”(Gershoff, Lee & Durrant, 2017, p.1). For example, if they are acting out because they don’t want to take a shower, so you spank them. In that moment they learn, when I say no they hit me. They will reciprocate the same action towards you. If they ask to go to McDonald’s and you say no, they will want to hit and probably hit you because you said no. Any parent will be mad when their child hits them, but the actions children do are learned from people at home, usually their parents. So the person to blame in these types of situations are the parents. Physical punishment has a negative impact on children's lives. “Setting a good example for problem solving helps children develop problem solving skills” (Ballantine, 2001). Parents are the primary examples that children have. If parents set a bad example for the child, then the possibility of the child behaving this way is high. “Corporal punishment may succeed in temporarily controlling a child's behaviors. The trouble is, the children may suffer from low self-esteem and depression, become overly aggressive, and exhibit antisocial behavior later as a result”(Mitchell,
The way the author uses rhetoric in this essay as a way of strengthening the argument being made is excellent. The impact that the author gets by the use of rhetoric justifies that by using ethos the author can establishes credibility with the reader. Evidence that supports the author uses the lines “says Alan Kazdin, director of the Yale Parenting Center” (Khazan) to establish with the readers that they are not just reading an opinion paper from an individual not qualified to give reliable data such as a garbage man or a medical doctor. The author of the quote “The best way to reduce misbehavior is to provide abundant positive reinforcement for good behavior. Punishment in the form of unpleasant consequences might stop misbehavior, but it often has undesirable side effects.”
Skinner in 1938.Operant conditioning is a form of learning which explains the relation of behaviors on certain rewards and consequences. The study of the theory only deals with expressible behaviors and not any internal mental thoughts and brain mechanisms. Operant Conditioning works by applying two major concepts, Reinforcements and Punishments, after the behavior is executed, which causes the rate of behavior to increase or decrease. Skinner’s Skinner box experiment with a rat is the base for operant conditioning theory and its concepts. The main principle comprises changing environmental events that are related to a person's behavior.
Operant conditioning is a condition in which the desired behavior or increasingly closer to the approximations to it are followed by a rewarding or reinforcing stimulus. “The fundamental principle of operant conditioning is that behavior is determined by its consequences. Behavior does not occur as isolated and unrelated events; the consequences that follow the actions of an animal, be they good, bad, or indifferent, will have an effect on the frequency with which those actions are repeated in the future,” (Laule 2). A reinforcement strengthens a response, reinforcement
In the article “No Spanking, No Time-out, No Problems”, Olga Khazan uses many rhetorical strategies to support and persuade her audience. That traditional punishment methods of parents will not change a child’s/children’s unruly behavior overall, but positive reinforcement will increase the chances of better behavior not only now, but in the future as well. “Positive reinforcement is the presentation of a pleasurable consequence following a behavior” (Craighead). This twist to traditional discipline teaches children to work towards a resolution instead of teaching them to lean toward violence. “For example, the way that parents discipline their children is how children discipline their peers” (Khazan).
As Karen Stephens (2007) said parent play a major role in how children turn out. Parent should try to use teaching method to help children to development a sense of responsibility. Also, parent should have more than one strategies to raise a child. The way you respond to a child’s manipulation as a baby sets the tone of the rest of the life together. In my opinion, parents should try to avoid spanking because those children are going to do the same thing on their siblings, their classmate or their friends.
Will good parenting skills change a child’s bad behavior? Some people may say that to fix a child’s behavior parents should involve punishment. Maybe they will also say that punishment leads to having a well-disciplined child. In the article, “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problem,” Olga Khazan proposes a parenting intervention from a child psychologist, she utilizes it to persuade readers along with parents into believing that punishment cannot change negative behavior. Kazdin discusses the causes behind a negative behavior from a child and utilizes it to prove that punishment does not need to be utilized.
They are more likely to rebel against corporal punishment than against other disciplinary techniques. They do not always think rationally like adults, but they do have an innate sense of fairness—though their standards are not the same as adults. Oftentimes, the sense of unfairness escalates to a feeling of humiliation. When punishment humiliates children they either rebel or withdraw. While hitting may appear to make the child afraid to repeat the misbehavior, it is more likely to make the child fear the offender.
An assistant professor by the name of Catherine Taylor conducted a study of over two-thousand children to show how aggression played a role in students that were spanked in comparison to those that were not. According to Taylor, “children who have been spanked are at a greater risk of becoming bullies. ”(Favela). Disciplining a child by spanking them might cause pain for only a brief amount of time, but it is not worth the long-term problems that it could possibly cause. Any parent that chooses to discipline a child through the use of spanking should consider the harm and injustice that they are inflicting by doing so.
As the years progressed and the spanking continued, Antisocial Behavior tended to worsen as well. The study also found that when parents reduced their tendency of spanking, Antisocial Behaviors tended
Paper 1: BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION Becky Templin Clovis Community College February 17, 2018 Introduction The theory behind behavior modification ethics has a reputation for its accomplishments and disappointments. In addition to this, there are many dangers in using physical punishment as behavior modification with the two primary modifiers of behavior being Classical conditioning and Operant conditioning. The outcome of using negative reinforcement has its share of benefits and downfalls in human behavior whereas; positive reinforcement seems to win over.
Conclusion Operant conditioning is a theory which was developed by an American psychologist named B.F. Skinner. This theory has been known as a learning process. It applies to four different methods, that consists of positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment and negative punishment. In this case positive is seen as something being added and negative as something being taken away.
Introduction Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stage of initiative versus guilt as well as B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning within behaviorism would be the theories that best describe the given scenario. Initiative vs. Guilt At this stage, it is known that children assert themselves more frequently and according to Bee (as cited in Thatcher, 2011) it is a “time of vigor of action and consists of behaviors that the parents may see as aggressive". This stage also sees the child wanting to initiate and complete his/ her own actions for a purpose.
Children who are physically punished more often tend to obey parents less with time, and to develop more aggressive behaviors, including toward other
Coporal Punishment which is the act of violence toward a child who has misbehaved is argued by many to either be abusive to the child or helpful. Some people argue that children which expierence coporal punishment are more likely to grow up and become vandals and thieves while others argue that coporal punishment makes a child tougher and prepares them for the real world. While Coporal Punishment was more accepted in the past its acceptance is declining more as we head to the future. The media has made Coporal Punishment feel wrong and abusive and while parents might still approve of it, they might not feel pollitcally correct talking about it.
1a) Operant conditioning 1b) Operant conditioning is learning controlled by the consequences of the organism's behavior. In other words, the organism's actions are shaped by the reward or rather, lack of reward that follows. 1c) Operant conditioning can be applied to studying for finals. I would be the organism in this case and the behavior that is encouraged would be the act of studying.