Pathos Women's Rights

866 Words4 Pages

Women’s Rights give women the ability to do the sames as men including getting a job, not being forced into a marriage at a young age, and the ability to go to school for an education. When the United States was beginning, men were more superior than women and women were expected to do house work and watch the children without having a job or education. In the article, “Why One Activist Thinks We Need a Men’s Movement,” by Kevin Powell it talks about Women’s Rights by discussing consent in sexual situations. Jessica Ravitz wrote an article titled, “Women in the World: Where the U.S. falters in quest for equality,” that talks about Women’s Rights by stating that the United Nation, that the United States is apart of, has adopted the Convention …show more content…

falters in quest for equality,” purpose is to show the rights that the United Nation adopted which the United States are not giving all these rights shows pathos because of all the countries should be allowed these rights and how pathetic the United States is by not giving citizens all these …show more content…

The author’s purpose and point of view are stated clearly by an international bill of rights for women that the rest of the United Nation has ratified except for 7 countries including the United States. She uses pathos to tell the readers that the United States does not have the same rights for women as other countries to show an emotional response about how the U.S. does not find these rights equal to everyone. There is many constitutions around the world including the U.S. Constitution but 32 of the constitutions around the world do not have a gender equality guarantee, which the author shows when she writes, “The Equal Rights Amendment, meant to give women in America the sort of explicit protections now offered in constitutions across the globe, was introduced to Congress in 1923. Both the houses of Congress passed it in 1972. It them went to state legislatures, requiring the ratification of 38 states. But by the time the 1982 deadline hit, it had fallen three states short.” (Ravitz, 3). Ravitz’s purpose and point of view is shown by the Equal Rights Amendment not being ratified. The author uses pathos to make an emotional response from readers about how the states did

Open Document