One could argue that the people of the western United States would never consider the arguments made in The Communist Manifesto due to their patriotism and their ignorance of the national economical issues. This assumption is false, however, because some of the farmers had already thought similar ideas to what is in The Communist Manifesto, and the document would only organize and put their own thoughts into words. One example of this would be Tom Joad’s idea to have “them people [get] together and says, ‘let ‘em rot.’ Wouldn’ be long ‘fore the price went up, my God!” (Steinbeck, 317). This is referring to collectively unifying the farmers to, in a way, overthrow the landowners, which is a very big goal described in The Communist Manifesto. …show more content…
This is well explained by Edwin T. Bowden in his essay, “The Okies and Isolation”. Here he explains that “there are plenty of “others” to hold the Okies in isolation. Sometimes they act out of the brutality and hatred born of fear, as the depties who destroy the Hooverville camps. Sometimes they act out of selfishness and desire for personal gain, as the orchard owners who break up the strike against starvation wages,” (Bowden, 71). This shows the tension between the tenant farmers and the authorities. In several places in The Grapes of Wrath, there are examples of this fear coming out to harm the Okies into submission. One instance of this appears when a third person narrator explains that “ the owners hated [the Okies] because the owners knew they were soft and the Okies strong, that they were fed and the Okies hungry; and perhaps the owners had heard from their grandfathers how easy it is to steal land from a soft man if you are fierce and hungry and armed. The owners hated them,” (Steinbeck, 300). This awareness of the potential threat brought with the Okies and other farmers was a large source of the persecution shown to the lower class in 1930’s California. The landowners were rightly afraid of the large sum of starving farmers that had accumulated over the decade. Luckily for them, these
Most of the “owner men” in Grapes of Wrath, were compassionate and despised having to evict the tenant families. Even the owner men that were cold in their affect was that way out of self-preservation. The coldness was to protect themselves because they had no choice except to evict the land
In The Grapes of Wrath the Joads are forced off of their land because sharecropping was no longer profitable and are left with no work or home. What was happening to the Joads was happening to all the other farmers at the same time. With this mass of families
Their homes were layered in dirt/dust. Their food and water source wasn't that great either. That's how serious this issue was. The Grapes of Wrath has everything to do with the dust bowl and scarcity. Because they were limited to certain
People change. People adapt to the situation at hand, whether it’s a good or bad change depends on the person. In The Road there is a post apocalyptic world and Cormac McCarthy wants to show many different types of these people, the good, the bad, the ugly. Throughout the book a man and his son try to survive the apocalypse, but in turn end up confronting some terrible persons. These people have become that way in order to survive in a dangerous and changing society.
Sam Roberts in the article A Decade of Fear argues that Americans turned against each other because of McCarthyism. Roberts supports his argument by explaining and describing the many occurences of paranoia caused by McCarthyism. The author’s purpose is to persuade the reader that McCarthy’s gross grab at power caused tension between Americans. It is clear that the author is directing his claims to an older and more educated audience, due to his cynical tone. I strongly agree with Roberts’ claim.
The Grapes of Wrath: “And then the dispossessed were drawn west- from Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico; from Nevada and Arkansas, families, tribes, dusted out, tractored out. Carloads, caravans, homeless and hungry; twenty thousand and fifty thousand
In the Grapes of Wrath, the farmers don 't always have the benefit of a helping hand. People sell what little they can to prepare for moving out. As they sell their belongings for really low prices they say “we could saved you, but you cut us down, and soon you will be cut down and there’ll be none of us to save you” (Steinbeck 87). The farmers know others will experience similar circumstances and know that they could have helped one another, showing understanding of another’s troubles even in their desperation. As they descend into destitution, they strive to help one another.
In The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck follows the Joad family as they suffer the hardships caused by the Dust Bowl in the 1930’s. The most important lesson people can learn from the novel is the value of a human life. Although the 1930’s was a low point in American society, the ill-treatment of human beings is still relevant today. Just like Jim Casy’s philosophy, it is important to fight for the rights of the people and their dignity. There are several examples of oppression in The Grapes of wrath.
As the government ignored farmers and as their debts grew, farmers began no receive no reward for their works in the fields. Farmers found that unity would be the only way for them to overcome their challenges. However, as these challenges built up, many quit their jobs as farmers and moved to the northern cities and became factories
Foundations of Sociology (SOC10010) Mid-Term Essay: Question: ‘’Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.’’ Answer: In this essay I have been asked to discuss three main ideas from the ‘’Communist Manifesto’’, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. To do this I will summarise three main ideas from the text and critically analyse them.
The three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, had little to no influence when it was first published in 1848 for the Communist League. However, soon after Marx and Engel’s other writings on socialism became published it grew in popularity, and was considered a standard text of the time (Brians, 2006). With Marx’s radical ideas, and Engels’ thorough writing, they were able to convey how they were individual of the other socialists of the time and elaborate on their idea socialism and how it would inevitably be achieved. The three main ideas from The Communist Manifesto are class conflict, ephemeral capitalism, and inevitable revolution.
It probably motivated a lot of the previous communist. Again, let us keep in mind that this from the past. In order, to make an effective passage in the present time it will need to be reworded and actualized to situation now days. Overall, I do believe that if we learn from our past we can better our future.
In John Steinbeck’s movie and novel “The Grapes of Wrath,” he presented the ecological, sociological, and economic disaster that the United States suffered during the 1930s. The movie is set during the Great Depression, “Dust Bowl,” and it focuses on the Joad’s family. It is a poor family of farmers who resides in Oklahoma, a home fulfilled by scarcity, economic hardship, agricultural changes, and job losses. Unexpectedly, affected by their hopeless situation, as well as they are trapped in an ecological madness, the Joad’s decided to move out to California; Beside with other people whom were affected by the same conditions, those seeking for jobs, land, a better life, and dignity.
In the The Grapes of Wrath, I will follow the farming families as they move across Oklahoma to California, and observe them living in various squatter 's camps in California, always on the looking for work and ways to improve their lives because that is what people living under the rules of capitalism must do to survive in that period. Capitalism is dependent upon a free market, and privately owned businesses. In The Grapes of Wrath, we see how capitalism costs the Joads their farm when they are unable to produce crops due to the drought. They cannot pay what they owe for their land nor the renters what they owe for the house and.
From this history, Mao set out to turn the current workers revolution into a peasant revolution. Mao himself believed that the road to success relied “mainly on the alliance of the workers and the peasants” (Zedong, 1949). Even with Zedong’s proclamation of unity, it was seen that the peasants themselves became the driving force of the war. Up until 1926, years before the war, the workers and peasants had been more united, but in this year the peasants were given more responsibility and separation from the workers. Leon Trotsky evaluated the position of the peasants and workers and argued that while the peasants “desire a friendship with the workers” that they are incapable of maintaining it (Trotsky, 1932).