The main role of appraisals is to maintain organizational performance, as well as the individual performance in order to identify the main issue within the organization. CIPD research (2009) showed that more than 80% of HR practitioners carry out performance appraisal which indicates that half of those people are actually satisfied with the results. Redman & Wilkinson (2009) specified that it’s not recently that studies have explicitly focused on performance issues and the data has been available and shown a positive relationship between the presence of HR practice and organizational performance in other words
Communication
Paul J Meyer quoted “Communication - the human connection - is the key to personal and career success”. It is noticeable
…show more content…
Recent research suggested that “over a third of UK workers (37%) believe appraisals are a waste of time and do not contribute towards their personal career development at all”. The research also noted that while a third of employees dedicate one-day work a year to appraisals, many see it as a pointless exercise Newcombe.T (2012). This is because most employees now feels like they are not benefiting from appraising their own …show more content…
The appraisal process will help the employees learn just what it is that the organization considers to be superior. And now that most people want to be seen as superior performers, a performance appraisal process provides them with a means to demonstrate that they actually are. Performance appraisal encourages employees to avoid being identified as inferior performers.
Encouraging Coaching and Mentoring: Coaching is an informal approach to an individual’s development based on close relationship with another person who is of expertise to company thus acting as an immediate manager Brockbank & McGill (2006). Managers are expected to be good coaches to their team members and mentors to their employees. Performance appraisal identifies the areas where coaching is necessary and encourages managers to take an active coaching role. Whitmore (2009) pointed that coaching is a continuous occurrence in an organization. Coaching enable employees to improve their performance and motivation through ongoing dialogues with the coach as a result strengthening relationship which reinforce comment amongst employees and the organization due to a favourable working environment Passmore (2010). CIPD (2012) conducted a research based on coaching which showed that about 43% of organizations used coaching to improve poor performance,
Coaching is a useful way of developing people skills and abilities, and of coarse boosting performance. It can also help deal with
1 Deborah Tannen, Ph.D. That’s Not What I Meant!. Amazon, 1987. Reviewed by Shelby D. Slocum, Pittsburg State University, KS. This book provides an explanation of the common misconceptions in communication.
What’s a world without communicating? That is like asking what a birthday party is without cake. A world without there being a constant form of communication is a non functionable world. The World that montag lies in is barley functional. There is crime happening everywhere.
As a coach, I believe that coaching is “unlocking a person’s potential to maximize their own performance. It is helping them to learn rather than teaching them” which was stated by John Whitman. I agree with this quote because as a coach I want to do what is best for each player individually. Therefore, I stress the importance of accountability, punctuality, discipline, but most importantly great sportsmanship. Every action or reaction of each person affects the entire team.
This resulted in a significant increase in the goal attainment, transformational leadership and psychological well-being for those observed receiving coaching. The average change in the perceived quality of interaction improved for those who received coaching. It was also found that the closer any member of the network was identified as being connected to those who received coaching, the more likely they were to experience a positive increase in well-being. This research highlights the influence of leadership coaching beyond the individual
According to Performance Coaching International (PCI, 2012) the concept of coaching has been in practice for as long as the human race has been in existence. In ancient Greece and Rome, skills such as running, archery, horse riding and gladiatorial skills were all extensively trained with a view of improving (PCI, 2012). Like many coaches today, ancient Greek coaches were former athletes themselves and helped the competitors of their day achieve personal excellence (Levinson & Christensen, 1996). It is often said that behind every good sports performer is a good coach. Barker, et al.
The system needs to be productive or it will be a waste of money and time, this makes a virtual as a potential to refine employee’s performance. The performance appraisal will lead to a behavioral change when an individual accepts the system (A. Elverfeldt, 2005). The system used in performance appraisal has the roots and become more powerful in almost all the organization through the world. These are the assessment of the performance of an employee or employer, whom one is concern about (D. Goel, 2010). According to E. Lawler, G. Benson and M McDermott, 2012 performance appraisal is a censure powe of management practices, criticism ranging from an extensive waste of time to their having a negative impact on the correlation between managers and their subordinates.
When the team’s performance expectations are met, there should be rewards and recognitions so as to encourage them to continue their great performance. Nonetheless, since performance is link to remunerations, team members might feel competitive and hence resort to unethical ways in order to achieve their targets. Alternatively, attending leadership training to improve leadership skills and to upgrade the current skills can be done. With that, the manager will have the knowledge on how to communicate, guide and motivate his team to achieve their goals.
For this assignment, we were asked to conduct coaching sessions in groups of three with our colleagues for two months and draft a reflective essay on our experience. I hope this reflective essay will help me understand the in-depth concepts of coaching while helping me interact and respond better to people in different situations.
Any feedback should be confidential so as not to identify any individual coachee. 1.3 Present the case for using coaching or mentoring to benefit individuals and organisation performance. Benefits to the individual Coaching and mentoring when delivered in a structured and engaging manner can bring significant benefits to an individual in both personal and professional development. Both approaches help develop and increased level of confidence and self-awareness, improved inter-personal skills, managing conflict and enhanced leadership skills (Roberts 2000, Beamont 2002). They provide the opportunity for feedback on strengths and areas for development in a safe, judgmental environment and can help accelerate learning.
Key to Effective coaching). This shows how serious you are and now they know the boundaries ad what you are looking for as a coach. After you gain a solid relationship you can perform an assessment on who you are coaching to see what skills they lack and what you need to work on. According to The Key to Effective Coaching, you should provide timely feedback and clarify behaviors you would like to change. You need to always be honest with them so they can trust you more and know what you are telling is the truth.
Mentor Mentor is an experienced person in a company or educational institution who trains and counsels new employees or students(Oxford English Dictionary).Mentor help to promote personal and professional growth in an individual by sharing the knowledge and insights that they learned through the years. A mentor often has two primary functions,the career-related function which enhance the mentee’s professional performance and development as a coach and the psychosocial function which establishes the mentor as a role model and support system for the mentee. Mentor also has responsibility to serve as the role model,cheerleader or advocate. As kaye observes,mentors support mentees in the risk taking is crucial to their growth. Because their position could directly effect on individuals growth,mentor require some specific skills such as empathizing and ability to ask question.
To nurture manpower in the organization that can work on both exploitative and exploratory endeavors, the appraisal process needs to be more development-oriented with long-term orientation (Chan, Shaffer, and Snape, 2004; Collins and Clark, 2003). Normally, appraisals have been found to be result based with little weight given to behavioral based criteria. The system must be adaptable to shift between the twin criteria of evaluations when assessing employees working on exploratory or exploitative work activities. Many times, force fitting results in distributions that are not actually normal but are forced to be so. Several scholars have in fact gone against the prevalent view and argued that employee performance may not always follow the normal distribution it is expected to (Bernardin & Beatty, 1984; Murphy & Cleveland, 1995; Saal et al., 1980; Schmidt & Johnson, 1973).
3.0 COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN Communication is the core for everything we do in the workplace. It happens all the time and every day at workplace. Nevertheless, communication breakdown occurs and can affect the organization own its own. This is because communication breakdown does not only occur among the organizational workers but also with the clients of the organization.
1.4.1 Literature Review HRM practices are a process of engaging, motivating, and maintaining employees to ensure the organizational survival (Schuler and Jackson, 1987). According to (Delery and Doty, 1996) HRM practices are prepared and implemented in a way that human capital plays important role in achieving the goals and objectives of the organization. The appropriate use of HRM practices strongly influence the standard of employer and the degree of employee commitment (Purcell, 2003). HRM practices like, training and development, performance appraisal allow the employees to do better in order to enhance the organizational performance (Snell and Dean, 1992; Pfeffer, 1998).