I am a born and raised West Texas white male. The demographic should speak for itself. I side myself with the Republican Party, with mostly Libertarian views and a couple of Democratic to be honest. Growing up, politics was something that we did not talk about too often, we actually would tend to avoid it. I would remember when my father told once and only once what being a Republican meant, and what being a Democrat meant. He told me, “Republicans care about things like family and focus on America more than the rest of the world. Democrats are about the opposite”, he told me with a boyish smirk on his face, “they put their friends before family and they see things from the point of view from everybody else in the world.” My dad gave me the …show more content…
This is where the controversy within myself starts. Because this idea sets in with women rights as well. I do not believe the government has the right to tell you what you should and shouldn’t do with your child. I do not believe they should help you, and I don’t believe that they should hurt you either. This also means no government funding for planned parenthood. Women decisions should be theirs, with support of the father. This is just one example where I believe the government takes things too far. They become too involved from my perspective. I believe another great example of this is any special interest group. While also seeing the need for them and their policy creation abilities, there comes a point where a group can gain too much power. Michelle Leach tells more more on the listosaur.com website stating, “From the eight-hour workday to social safety nets such as Medicare, we owe many of the rights we take for granted to the work of special interest groups. Yet many of these organizations have been criticized in recent years for their enormous influence on American politics, whether by endorsing candidates, funding political ads, or in lobbying for legislation favorable to their interests…” With policies like this it is easy to see how so many of these thing can lead to corruption and chaos. With the libertarian party, corruption …show more content…
That also means that it will cut back a lot of government responsibilities. “We believe that government’s only responsibility, if any, should be protecting people from force and fraud.” as stated from the Libertarian Party website. Which leaves the American people free to do essentially anything. It is a very big advocation on its own to have several government funded projects to become privatized, which is something also shared by the Republican party as well. An overall conservative stance. So as far as saying what they influence, they stay neutral on most subjects, such as abortion as explained in a interview with Rand Paul, “Rand Paul is also strongly against abortion rights, which many libertarians disagree with. What is the libertarian position on abortion?” Rand Paul - “I don 't think there is a libertarian position on abortion. There was a study done by a graduate student at UCLA that found that about two-thirds of people you would identify as libertarian are pro-choice. From a philosophical perspective, libertarians generally believe the appropriate role of government is to protect life, liberty, and property. The question is, is forbidding abortion a way of protecting life, or should it be viewed as a restriction of liberty? There 's a plausible libertarian case on both sides.” Another policy that I believe that would work well with most of
I am a republican because, I believe the power should be closer to the people of the United States of America, I believe in limited taxation, and I believe in a strong national defense. First, I am a republican because I believe in the federalist system of government. Basically, I believe in the fact that the power should be equally divided between the government and the people, and the people should have a say in the country’s actions. Also, I believe that the people should not have to pay too much taxes, for they work hard for their money and they should be able to enjoy their money made. I know that the country needs taxes, but just hold the taxes to minimum, and find the equilibrium where everyone agrees.
The Paris terrorist attacks have caused a rift in the libertarian community. To the surprise of many, some libertarians advocate for a closed border policy. I was in shock too when I first heard of this position considering that libertarianism is about natural rights, and what more basic right is there than movement? This debate is extremely complicated, and it is unfortunate many fail to see this the complications. Ask any run-of-the-mill libertarian on the street about the debate and they will claim there are two sides: the open border libertarians, i.e. the true and consistent libertarians, and the closed border libertarians, i.e. reactionaries who either use utilitarianism or are changing up libertarian principles to make them fit what
However, I don’t think that this is a bad thing. Gary Johnson is a libertarian, meaning that he is socially liberal, but fiscally conservative. He can work well with both sides because he agrees with both sides. Johnson was the Republican governor of New Mexico, a liberal state. He was able to work across the aisle and pass legislation even though his constituents disagreed with him.
So that people can make their own decisions and live in a free society. He also supports staying out of foreign affairs and worry about what's going on here in America. Paul has been an isolationist most of his career and all his foreign policy views are based off of isolationism. When it comes to economic freedom Paul believes the government taxes and controls you so we must change our foreign policy to one of economic freedom and diplomacy. That is the only way to promote peace and prosperity.
The history of political parties in Texas is marked by nearly a century of Democratic Party dominance followed by a realignment that shifted the balance of power in favor if the republicans. Political science professor Cal Jilson noted that the dominance of one party in Texas has been a result of the state’s dominant values. Both parties in Texas today reflect more conservative versions of their national counterparts. The other chapter talks about the Interest groups in Texas. Interest groups plays a critical role in all democratic systems of government.
Flippen 1 Shaunice Flippen Planned Parenthood is considered a public interest group, which are citizen activist groups that try to represent what they deem to be the interest of the public at large. The most recent controversy in the news today is the proposal by the Republican Party to defund Planned Parenthood for one year, which is expected to fail, which could shut down the government. President Obama and Senate Democrats are willing to shut down the federal government to ensure that tax dollars keep flowing to the Planned Parenthood organization, one of their biggest political allies and financial contributor of millions of dollars to the Democratic Presidential campaign and Party. Lobbyist who works for the Planned Parenthood
Libertarians believe that each person owns his own life and property and has the right to make his own choices as to how he lives his life and uses his property – as long as he simply respects the equal right of others to do the same.” (theadvocates.org). Libertarians believe in three policies, no paternalism, no morals legislation, and no redistribution of income or wealth (Sandel,59). No paternalism, is against the laws that protect individuals from harm, so essentially it’s saying that if an individual decides to partake in reckless behavior and no one but the individual performing the risky behavior is harmed or affected, there should be no laws preventing the individual from performing that behavior (for example, not wearing a seatbelt). No
As a woman, I believe that my rights should not be determined by some man in Washington DC. Instead, everyone should be entitled to their own opinion. Abortions and contraceptives are not procedures or medications that women usually advertise and frankly, it is none of government’s business what women choose to do with their own bodies. They are not the property of men or the
Taking the subway to the Hart Senate building from the United States Capital, I thought to myself “What am I going to say to Senator Nelson to bring him to the Senate Chamber. ” I never in my life had to direct nor influence a person of such authority that they had to perform a duty, but that quickly changed during a near midnight Senate session this past summer. On the night of an important vote, the Senators started to file in slowly to the Senate Chamber. Even though most Senators did not vote until after the time ran out, Senator Nelson, the Senator who sponsored me to be a Senate Page, was the only Senator not present.
With almost half the nation divided among their views, abortion remains one of the most controversial topics in our society. Since Roe v. Wade, our views in society as well as following court cases have been progressing toward the woman’s right to choose. The precedent set by Roe v. Wade made the Supreme Court acknowledge that it cannot rule specifically when life begins and it also affirms that it is the woman’s right to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment. In the 1st Amendment, the Establishment Clause forbids the government from passing laws “which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another”. Many Christian pro-lifers use their religious beliefs to dispute when life begins.
Lastly, they strongly believe that the government should provide taxpayer funded abortions for women who cannot afford them ("Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs"). On the other hand, Republican views on abortion are opposite of the Democratic view. They believe that the human life begins at conception; disagreeing with the Democratic belief that a fetus is not a human life. Republicans biggest belief is that abortion is murder ("Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs"). Everybody hears about their party not agreeing with some of the views their party believes in, but not many people have heard about an elected official not agreeing and
My political view is in between conservative and liberal, moderate. A moderate is an individual who is not extreme, partisan, nor radical. My view is moderate because it sits between the two extremes of liberal and conservative, usually combining aspects of both. On the topic
Republicans vs. Democrats When the United States of America was founded, George Washington warned against the formation of political parties. By the time the second election came around there were already two political parties, the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans. These parties eventually turned into the Republican and Democratic parties we have today. While these parties have shifted to become almost polar opposites politically, they still share some common goals.
Libertarianism is a political philosophy that said that the state should interfere as little as possible with people. Utilitarians, differ from Libertarianism, because are primarily concerned with the advocating for human provision of a minimal level of well being and social support for legal resident and citizens. They maintained that society ought to be systematically arranged in whatever way that would best reached this end potentially defend the vase and achieve greater social equality for the needy. Utilitarians think that the right thing to do is whatever produces the greatest amount of happiness.
One of the influences my parents had was drilling republican thoughts into my head for the past twenty years; however, I got placed as a Libertarian on all three quizzes. Although I scored the same on three, there were a few differences in the quizzes and how they explained my position to me. The first quiz was just a simple graph showing me where I scored on the graph as compared to where I had placed myself before the quiz. The second quiz was a nice, brief statement about what Libertarian’s generally stand for whereas the third quiz was cluttered with positions and over explanations of them all.