No worries, I didn’t feel slighted at all. I considered it friendly banter, and I do have a tendency to say what I mean, and mean what I say :-) Therefore, I will point out that you did/do sound a bit patronizing, i.e. “well meaning” which denotes failure. This doesn’t offend me, in fact, I find it amusing :-) Liberals have a a plethora of tremendous accomplishments, that could be said began with Lincoln ideals. Unfortunately, the current GOP is a a dismal shadow of the Lincoln party (which of course was quite liberal in that time). I’m not at all concerned with Gary Johnson having any chance in this race, and do find it astonishing that he didn’t even know what Aleppo is, and couldn’t name one single world leader that he admired. Yikes,
DiLorenzo, Thomas J. The Real Lincoln A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2003. The Real Lincoln
Lincoln and Republican Party Known as one of the greatest presidents of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, shaped the nation in his image, leaving benefits to people. Striking shifts occurred in the nation at Lincoln’s time: In 1809, when Lincoln was born, the nation was just starting to grow with one united body; during his participation in political issues, the nation was parted; but after Lincoln’s presidency, it not only became one again but also forever altered and strengthened. Once had been a self-educated lawyer, a Whig Party leader, and a member of the Illinois House of Representatives and then of the United States House of Representatives, Lincoln led the building of the new Republican Party. During his presidency, the Civil War burst.
The elections of 1800 and 1864 had made the Republicans victorious in the electorate. However, the South’s influence on the electorate had significantly decreased and the Democratic Party was divided as well. After the Civil War, with only a few requirements for readmission, Conservatives wanted the south to accept the abolition of slavery. Led by Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, the Radical Republicans wanted the military leaders of the Confederacy to be punished. The punishments would include the confiscation of Southern property and suffrage for freedmen.
Lincoln ignored a Supreme Court justice 's decision overturning his order, and over the next few years, the Great Emancipator, in one of the war 's starkest ironies, allowed these new restrictions, which also imposed martial law in some volatile border areas and curbed freedom of speech and the press, to expand throughout the Northern states. As the war drew to a close, though, some historians believe Lincoln may have begun to recognize the dangers of his own unprecedented expansion of presidential war powers. More than 13,000 civilians were arrested under martial law during the war throughout the Union. But it was in Missouri, in particular, nearly a thousand miles from the nation 's capital and far beyond the federal government 's
Rebuilding the Grand Old Party We were all in. As president of the local Young Republicans chapter, I made the executive decision to shift our entire political operation (all five active members) to support a longshot political novice. We were committed to working for Republican nominee Sarah Davis in her bid to become the State Representative for southwest Houston. It seemed clear to me that Sarah Davis represented the future of the Party: a refreshing young candidate eager to listen to the concerns of the next generation, a successful female lawyer ready to alter the perception of a Texas politician, a self-described “rational Republican” willing to buck her Party’s establishment in support of progressive policy prescriptions.
However, I don’t think that this is a bad thing. Gary Johnson is a libertarian, meaning that he is socially liberal, but fiscally conservative. He can work well with both sides because he agrees with both sides. Johnson was the Republican governor of New Mexico, a liberal state. He was able to work across the aisle and pass legislation even though his constituents disagreed with him.
James M. McPherson’s book, “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution,” is a truly informative and exciting book, which explores this simple, yet difficult question. Through his own documented lectures and published papers, the author defends the idea that the Civil War was indeed a second revolution by exploring various definitions of the word “revolution” and investigating data related to the wages of African-Americans, employment, property ownership, education, etc., in antebellum and postwar America. McPherson describes how the Civil War changed over time, and how Abraham Lincoln changed with the war. He also suggested that Lincoln could be viewed as a “conservative revolutionary,” and proposed that there were three main ways in which Lincoln as
The existential crisis in America had almost everything to do with slavery. Controversial decisions were made that shook the public along with government officials. The Missouri Compromise took a massive blow from the Kansas-Nebraska act and left anti-slavery politicians in an outrage. Even some Democrats found themselves opposing it on the basis that it destroyed popular sovereignty. Next, the Dred Scott court decision set an outstanding precedence for slaveholders.
In my opinion, I strongly argue that Lincoln was not racist. He believed that “negro” equality is guaranteed by the laws of God according to Document A. Abraham Lincoln always listened to his people’s desires, even if that meant to shun his own beliefs. His dream was to provide the best equality for his people. Lincoln despised slavery and believed that all African Americans were men and they were all created equal as stated in the US Constitution. Lincoln has done many actions to help his citizens and to gain their equality.
President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on the evening of April 14, 1865 at a play at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D. C. He was accompanied by his wife, Mary Lincoln, and Major Henry Rathbone and Miss Clara Harris, his future fiancee; the Lincoln’s were in a relatively good mood having ended the civil war. The four sat together in a private balcony box. The murderer, John Wilkes Booth, a famous actor of that play, hated Lincoln’s reforms. At around 10:00 pm, when the play was ending, Booth had walked past Major Henry Rathbone and shot Lincoln in the head. He then cut Rathbone’s arm and lept off to the stage, protecting himself and fleeing from the crime scene.
Final Essay: Intro: Slavery was one of the most controversial issues during Abraham Lincoln's presidency. During his presidency, sectionalism became more prominent as the southern states attempt to secede and rebel against the northern states. As a result, this triggered America to resort to a civil war that has an objective to resolve this issue. However, "President Lincoln insisted that the war was not about slavery or black rights; it was a war to preserve the Union" (Harper). President Lincoln, "Also declared that he had no intention of ending slavery where it existed" (Old Sturbridge Incorporation).
Radical and Republican was written by James Oaks. It was written mainly on two great leaders named Abraham Lincoln and Fredrick Douglass. Radical and republic describes details about the attitudes, reasons behind their thoughts and evens the political points of view on slavery. Although they had their different reasons, described by Oaks in his writing, they both hated slavery and thought differently about the issue. Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass had opposite thought about human equality and slavery but as the time passed by, they both became clearer and found that they are supporting same thing but differently.
Paragraph III: Upon Frederick’s escape to the north, he was able to find help and make it to New Bedford to settle with his wife. He was able to find employment on “the third day after my arrival, in stowing a sloop with a load of oil. It was new, dirty, and hard work for me; but I went at it with a glad heart and a willing hand. I was now my own master. It was a happy moment, the rapture of which can be understood only by those who have been slaves.
Thomas DiLorenzo’s book, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, is an attempt to prove that what has been written and taught about Abraham Lincoln is a myth. DiLorenzo claims that people he refers to as “Lincoln scholars” have gone to great lengths to do what he describes as, “to perpetuate countless myths and questionable interpretations of events” (1-2). DiLorenzo exposes Lincoln’s true opinions on race, his quest for economic nationalism, and his willingness to engage in war to fulfill his personal agenda. According to DiLorenzo, the “real Lincoln’s real agenda” was economic, not humanitarian like history has taught. “The Real Lincoln contains irrefutable evidence that a more appropriate title
Over hundreds of years America has had many presidents, some able to complete the tasks at hand, but many were not worthy of leading this nation. President Abraham Lincoln was one of the few who led the United States of America with great strength and courage. Abraham Lincoln was the best U.S. president because he had a great impact on ending slavery and he was one of the greatest natural strategists and leaders of all time. Abraham Lincoln is considered to be America 's wisest president. Abraham Lincoln, "proved to be a shrewd military strategist and a savvy leader during what became the costliest conflict ever fought on American soil."