I. I believe in the inviolability of human life II. I am absolutely disagree the elective abortion for personal or social convenience. A. All of us should not submit to, perform, encourage, pay for, or arrange such abortions. III. The word abortion by definition means the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus. IV. Abortion , without a doubt, is an extremely controversial issue nowadays because although some people including me, are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. V. Life begins at conception . A. “Life begins at conception. Therefore, an un-born baby has a right to life. This court ruling is a slap in the face of humanity” (Gordon, Tacoma, …show more content…
When the health of the mother is in serious jeopardy and already been advices by the medical authority to do abortion. C. When the baby cannot survive beyond birth due to severe defect of the fetus. VII. Even these special cases do not automatically justify abortion. VIII. Abortion is a really serious thing and should only be pondered after the persons involved have considered other alternatives such as give it to the other persons that in need of a baby as adoption. IX. I don’t believe that the abortion argument should be about rights, but about potentiality. X. In this speech I hope to present a persuasive moral argument that abortion is akin to murder and should be avoided, even if the child is unplanned or unwanted or the women would be in danger by the consequences of abortion. (Transition: Let’s look more closely at the health risks posed by cell phones.) Body I. Abortion is a murder. It is the intentionally killing of a human being and it is also can be considered as a war on the unborn which are obviously defenseless and voiceless. A. Abortion denies the right of the eternal being to have a mortal experience and also learning experience in this world. “I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my
Analysis Perhaps the most popular argument made against abortion is that the fetus is a person. Based on this assertion, the fetus has a moral right to life. The problem that Thomson identifies is that most of the anti-abortionist and pro-life supporters rely solely on this aspect for their argument and do not rationalize any other matter.
Each of the four main argumentative pillars of medical views, constitutional rights, political issues, and morality provided an in depth view into reasons why abortion should be illegal. The medical field clearly establishes when human life begins. The formation of an embryo occurs at conception, or the moment when the sperm and egg cells fuse. This means that any Pro-Choice people who rely on medicine rather than religion have to face the truth that abortion terminates life. The ideas presented on stem cell research were informative.
Abortion, the ending of a pregnancy by removing the fetus before it is able to survive on its own. The topic of abortion is an ongoing touchy subject between those who believe it should be illegal and those who say it should be an option. There are many factors that play into the controversy of abortion. In the book Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case against Abortion Choice by Francis J. Beckwith is an antiabortionist and believe abortion is not the answer. In this article the authors use argumentative strategies mainly being the rhetorical appeals, some subtle rebuttals are mentioned.
Abortion is not only a fluctuating concept in our society, but an ethical and emotional debate, as well. The image I have chosen presents concepts from a cultural and historical background, as well as presents an ethical, emotional, and logical appeal to the audience. The debate about abortion has simply been overblown and exhausted. The truth of the matter is, abortion is murder. Ending a life, whether innocent or guilty, is murder.
When arguing about whether abortion should remain legal, there are two main arguments being used. The most common argument given on the side in favor of abortion is that a person ’s right to life does not equal a person’s right to someone else’s body. The argument given by the side opposed to the legalization of abortion is that the fetus is considered a person and that every person has a right to life therefore abortion should be illegal. I think that abortion should remain legal because I think that a person’s right to their own body outweighs the fetus’ right to life.
Abortion has been a long standing ethical issue debated around the world. It is an issue that evokes, on all sides, very strong feelings and judgements and very heated arguments. The most radical argumentsof the anti- abortion or “pro-life” side of the debate views abortion as the murder of unborn children, and is the equivalent of infanticide making the legal issue of abortion (since the case of Morganthaler) at a rate of 1.5 million a year in Canada into a justified murder of the innocent. There is no right or wrong side to be on, but the side that would have to be against abortion. It has been decided in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court that as long as the baby lives in the womb, he or she would be the property of the mother.
Before Roe versus Wade in 1973, if a young woman became pregnant but did not want or could not support the child, the common decision in the United States was to give the child up for adoption. The mother would hardly have thought to do otherwise, and killing the innocent child would likely be last in her mind. Sadly, that destruction of innocent life is what is happening in our world today. If a mother does not want her child, the choice to have an abortion is made on various occasions.
Sometimes we may have to push our principles aside and do the right thing. Considering utilitarianism and situation ethics are extremely similar situation ethics views abortion differently to utilitarianism. The similarity between the two is that they both say that you should “act in the best interest of those affected” (BBC, 2014). Situation ethics states that it is in our best interests to have a family and to educate future generations, this can sometimes not be achieved though as in some circumstances the mother of the child may have been raped or might know that if the baby is born it will not have a life that would be worth living due to financial difficulty or disability. Abortion should however not be used as a method of birth control as it had been is a number of
Maddie Mandanis English 10H Wojcik 10/19/15 Persuasive Essay against Abortion Even animals have rights today, yet the unborn are not protected. We live in a society where everyone and everything has the right to be defended and acknowledged but abortion is legal. Since abortion was legalized in 1973, we have lost a whole generation of people.
Abortion is not a blanket problem, not every abortion resulted from an irresponsible act, each case must be treated in a different manner, each pregnancy happened under a different circumstances some which are not expected and planned for, We cannot foresee every case possible, and that is why each case will need to be treated in a different manner, one that will best work with the reasons rather than sweeping it under the
Ultimately, arguments from a diverse array of sources - philosophy, biology, religion, law, economics, human rights and more - inform both sides of the abortion debate, and on the balance of these arguments as a whole, a liberalised abortion policy is the best option in modern society. The moral permissibility of abortion hinges on the comparison between the mother’s rights and interests and the rights and interests of the fetus. In public discourse, one’s moral position on abortion is often defined by which side of this dichotomy one gives precedence to over the other. The pregnant woman’s interests support the argument for abortion; for instance, her moral entitlement to bodily integrity holds that she may counteract unwanted intrusion with her person.
Abortion has been a controversial issue in our society. The options are which path to take in life. The two paths we have to take or to choose from are give the child a chance to live or to be a teenage parent or having an abortion. In the young age of a pregnant women will be the hardest part of her life and when she doesn’t think that she can deal with the fact that she will having a child in young age the only way that she will take would be to get an abortion. The fetus will be decide to abort by their mother resulting in or caused by its death.
A fetus is not legally or scientifically a person or human being so abortion cannot be equated to murder or taking a life. Abortion is about allowing woman the right to make choices about when they want to have children in relation to their
Abortion should completely be abolished as this could be considered as an enormous brutality and tragedy of violently ending a new human life. According to my research, abortion has already been legalized in over 30 countries and is unlike any other issues debated on today. As I take a stand on this matter, I shall say that I am to argue in favor of life. My paper
In the twenty first century, we have the advance technology to practice the method of abortion safely. With that in mind, women should have a right to use abortion to their advantage and as an option if they feel that they cannot take care of the child. Whether it be because of financial shortcomings, lack of responsibility, or rape etc., every woman should have the choice of abortion. Abortion is the solution for women who know they are not prepared for children. Many people do not really have a complete understanding about the process of abortions.