Ladies and gentlemen, Members of the Parliament, Prime Minister Albanese, Governor General Hurley and fellow Australians,
Today, I stand before you as a young Australian like any other, passionate about our great nation and its future. I believe it is time for us to embark on a new chapter in our history—a chapter where Australia becomes a republic. This issue holds significant weight for our social fabric, historical evolution, political maturity and economic prosperity, when it comes to the discourse of our nation. The monarchy for as long as we know it has loomed over our country, as the representation of Australian Values and idol we must look up to and bow down to. But does a family that represents a world with no socio-economic equality,
…show more content…
The colonial era, driven by the interests of the monarchy, brought immense suffering and injustice to our First Nations people. The stolen generations, the dispossession of land, and the suppression of Aboriginal cultures are painful chapters in our nation's history. By becoming a republic, we can distance ourselves from this dark past and symbolize a break from the oppressive systems that perpetuated inequality and discrimination. It is an opportunity for us to reevaluate our values as a nation and reaffirm our commitment to reconciliation, justice, and respect for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. As a republic, we have the power to redefine our national identity in a way that is inclusive and acknowledges the true custodians of this land. We can strive for a society where Indigenous voices are heard, where the rights and aspirations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are respected, and where we work together to address the ongoing challenges faced by Indigenous communities. Furthering the work down with the voice to parliament referendum and not turning a blind eye to the past but moving past it together as one, as your predecessors have done Prime Minister and I am sure you will do through enacting this constitutional …show more content…
While some argue for stability and tradition and the notion of if 'it ain't broke don't fix it' phrase is prevalent, we must weigh these against the stark inequalities and burden on taxpayers. Families torn apart, people on the streets begging for help while the royals live in opulence—the cost is far greater than the benefits of economic and diplomatic relations. Transitioning to a republic is not just symbolic; it's a pragmatic step toward a brighter future. By reallocating the 164 million dollars to education, healthcare, and infrastructure, we prioritize fairness, equality, and progress. Let us embrace this opportunity to forge a more prosperous, inclusive, and self-determined
After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.
This essay will look at the aspects or reasons as to how and why the coalition government has won the federal election that took place on the 7th of September 2013. There are many reasons why Tony Abbott has won victory against the Rudd and Gillard government and to gain hundreds of thousands of Australian citizen’s trust. Reasons include; Tony Abbott putting a stop to the boats entering the Australian land, the abolishment of carbon tax and the reduction of the cost of living, Abbott promising to recognize Aborigines as nations first people, and lastly Tony Abbott took advantage the distrust that has been happening between the Rudd and Gillard Government to his power by pin pointing their flaws and issues thus making the citizens of Australia think twice on whether they should really put their complete trust in an unstable government to run the country given the economic difficulties happening today around the world. This essay will ideally discuss in depth as to why the coalition won the 2013 federal election and factors that has persuaded the citizens of Australia to vote for the Abbott government.
We are gathered here today, in loving memory of the greatest prime minister to ever grace Australian soil. Gough Whitlam broke a 23-year-old dry spell for the labour party and although his term in office was a mere three years, in that three years he did more than any other prime minister ever has and truly began to shape the Australia we live in today. From humble beginnings, to fighting for Australia, Whitlam was a man of great courage and will and for that his legacy will transpire long past his time. FIRST BODY PARA: ‘Terra Nullius’ the two words that initiated white superiority in Australia for over 100 years. Gough Whitlam was the first Australian prime minister to accept instead of oppress and put an end to a previously idealistic
Whitlam taught Australians and non-indigenous Australians they could achieve a measure of equality of opportunity in education, health care and careers. A 1972 photograph illustrates Gough Whitlam being kissed on the hand by a member of society at the opening of the federal election campaign in western Sydney (Appendix three). The appreciation shown towards Whitlam emphasises the praise he received from his decisions and implementations due to the diligence he portrayed through his work. Children’s author, Robert Darlington supports his likeable mannerism as he states, “His election speeches fired up crowds, who wanted change” (2004, p.244). Appendix three and Darlington accentuate Whitlam’s popularity through what he strived to accomplish as a prime minister.
As stated in the handout given in class, “The referendum provided a vehicle for change by empowering the Commonwealth to protectionism and assimilation.” Before the referendum, the States of Australia made laws which discriminated against and denied basic human rights such as being free to live where they wish, having access to education, receiving the same wages as non-Aboriginal people, etc. to Aboriginal people. The referendum did not guarantee such change — For the first five years after the referendum the Australian Government did not make any significant changes, as the referendum did not actually give the government full responsibility to make positive changes for Aboriginal people, it simply “opened the door for Australian Government involvement” as put by the Australian Constitution and 1967 Referendum Fact Sheet. The ongoing political commitment would be the only way to make sure the changes stayed in place; Something that fell short 50 years
Albanese’s speech was delivered at the Garma Festival in 2022. The Garma Festival is an event that offers a unique platform to make meaningful connections with indigenous Australians. Albanese chose to speak at this festival to express his confidence that a referendum on a Voice to Parliament would be successful and help create change for Indigenous Australians. He states that this is, ‘A straightforward proposition. A simple principle.
This highlights how the acquisition of rights for Aboriginal people was a fractured process as they still faced discrimination in the wake of changes that were meant to work in their favor. Although the Referendum did not increase the rights of Aboriginal people, it is still important in the Aboriginal Rights movement as it created the possibility for the Federation to create laws that could benefit or support Aboriginal
[9] The authors contend that the Australian Constitution has historically been used to marginalize Indigenous Australians and that any attempts at constitutional change must be cognizant of this history. The authors argue that the current constitutional framework in Australia needs to be revised to address Indigenous issues, particularly concerning the recognition of Indigenous rights and the participation of Indigenous Australians in the political process. They contend that a First Nations Voice to Parliament and a Makarrata Commission are essential components of constitutional change in Australia. They would provide a framework for Indigenous self-determination and recognizing Indigenous
This paper will give an overview of the act and how it impacted the Indigenous community into becoming
In an article titled 'No' vote will kill reconciliation, published on January 26th, 2023, in The Age, Noel Pearson argues that Australia's relationship with its indigenous peoples has never been settled, and the coming Voice referendum is an opportunity to do so. Pearson contends that the referendum aims to recognize Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia and give them a voice in their affairs and that this recognition is foundational to reconciliation. Pearson's tone is assertive and urgent, aimed at Australians, particularly those who have been historically opposed to indigenous recognition but also those who are unsure of the Voice. His purpose is to warn that if the opponents of recognition succeed
Context: The source was written nearly 130 years after the rebellion, during a time when historical analysis was more distinguished and could draw from a wider range of sources and perspectives. Purpose: Blainey's purpose is to critically evaluate the rebellion's significance in the trail of Australian nationhood and assess whether it genuinely drove the development of a more equal
Our nation has inflicted relentless bullying onto innocent souls, begging for respect by their own country. It is not too late to mend these souls and restore the respect they so rightfully deserve and desire for. To stitch the wounds of these hearts, injected by our own country’s actions, change the date of Australia date to accept the Indigenous
An Australian Republic is about us — not the Queen, not Prince Charles or the world economy. We should do it now, without delay. As Nelson Mandela once said, “ For to be free is not merely to cast off one 's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” Until we break our last Constitutional links to the mother country, our nationhood is incomplete. Now after just over 115 years of Federation, Australia must finally join the world of nations as a full equal, unshackled to any other nation.
But what about every other Australian? What about the Indigenous population and the multicultural population? Both of these groups which make up and help define who we are as Australians, so I ask you all this morning to consider why is it that we find these groups constantly being marginalised, discriminated against and not being offered equal opportunity? Ladies, gentlemen and prestigious guests, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to speak here
Change. It’s what many people fear. What would you do if something so familiar in your life was gone; changed forever? Changing the Australian flag would be taking away a piece of our country 's heritage. As Dame Quentin Bryce commented, "Our flag, and icon of our shared identity, is much loved, worn and flown by Australians here and across the world.