How Piketty Address the Problem of Inequality in Society By Zhang Ruochen The problem of inequality in the society has always been an attractive topic for sociologists, and even for economists. After 1980, there are two problems emerging in the U.S.: the escalating inequality of labor income and the rise of supermanager. By reviewing historical statistics of wage from a number of countries over a hundred years, Piketty strives to address the problem of inequality from the perspective of labor income, which is the income gap between the top and the bottom of the distribution. The race between education and technology plays a crucial role in explaining the reasons of the income gap, however when this theoretical model fails to elaborate on other …show more content…
Firstly, the wage is determined by workers’ individual contribution to the company, which is called marginal productivity. Secondly, productivity relies on the skill set of the worker, hence wage also varies with the demand and supply of the skill in the market. On one hand, people pick up skills through training and education; on the other hand, the market varies according to technological advancements nowadays. These hypotheses are widely accepted by the public, for example, in China, parents believe that children with higher degrees tend to obtain better positions with more generous payment in the company and employers awards their skilled employees for their outstanding contributions to the company. But how will the race between technology and education affect the problem of income inequality? Take the U.S. for instance, Piketty’s research indicates that the decreasing gap of income in America in 1970s suddenly widened in 1980s when the number of graduate students stopped to increase. At that time, the skills demanded for the developing technology are in short supply, hence the capable people are likely to get higher paid. In this case, the rate of technology progression is faster than that of the improvement of
Based on freedom and equality, America is today the country the most unequal amongst developed countries. Today there is a very big difference between the ideal, what Americans think and the reality of the income distribution. There is only a very small share in the middle class. This is a major crisis in the United States indeed, 1 per cent of the rich have 40 per cent of the country’s wealth.
Economic inequality is the uneven distribution of wealth and differences in economic security found in each individual in a specific country or region. Today, the topic is being discussed profusely by the American presidential candidates and by many writers around the world because of the beliefs of whether there should or should not be wealth redistribution policies put into action. Larry Schwartz, the author of “35 Soul-Crushing Facts about American Income Inequality”, makes a valid claim that economic inequality is the foundation of the problems that the entire American population face such as poverty and a hindrance of economic growth. To begin with, Schwartz has an exceptional argument that the high rate of economic inequality, like is
Throughout his article, he speaks about education. “The Upside of Income Inequality” makes two basic points to support the conclusion noted in the title of the article. First, the correlations between educationa and income; that the value of a college education has risen as income inequality has risen. And second, that therefore the rate of Americans who attend college has increased. The article provides multiple graphs that correlate different principles with education and income.
Rent Seeking by an American Economist In the American Economist Joseph Eugene Stiglitz’ essay, ‘Rent Seeking and the making of an Unequal Society,’ he argues, with the help of examples, that most of today’s economic and political problems are caused by the government. He goes in depth to explain why the government policies are a major factor in creating these problems, as well as the market forces itself. In addition to this, he discusses the relationship between income inequality and societal growth, and how rent seeking contributes to it. The following is main ideas from his essay that help to further prove his point of how rent seeking provides for income inequality, as well as how the government policies help in the making of an unequal society. Firstly, because the government policies shape the market forces, they are able to shape the degree of inequality.
Income inequality is still a problem in America, but there are ways to fight against it. Job disadvantages and food drives both prove that income inequality still exists in America. According
Income inequality The article “Confronting Inequality,” written by Paul Krugman, a professor at Princeton University, emphasizes that the middle class suffers from social inequality and economic inequality. Krugman suggests building a stronger safety net so the gap between the poor and rich can be limited to by raising of the taxes. Krugman uses this claim to highlight the fact that the middle class needs to be stronger and the only way to achieve that is to have a strong safety net. Krugman says the rich use loopholes in the tax system to cheat their way out of high taxes, and the poor pay a relatively high tax compared to what they should be paying.
In “The upside of income inequality” – Becker and Murphy, they mention the demand for education and skilled people is growing. The proportion of people going to a higher education is found among all racial and ethnic group (pg.585). As of figure 4 graph, the proportion of men and women ages 20 to 25 who are attending college has risen about half in a 40 year of tracking. They stress the important of education for all types of people that with higher level of education there is more opportunity. Therefore, in article “American remains the world’s beacon of Success” – Tim Roemer.
Many solutions, such as social investment, early childhood education, job training for young adults are avenues for addressing the shrinking middle class. Many of these ideas have been around since the 1990s, and most know that they will work, however, no one wants to pay the cost of such social investments. Thus, this is a fine example of how one topic, income inequality, can be addressed from two different angles, that of economist and that of sociologists, and what contributes to the inequality can be supported based on what is actually measured. In this specific comparison, due to the differences in disciplines addressing the same issue, the variables measured are completely different and as a result, yield very different results.
Why has inequality been widening? As we see the diagram from the graphic package, GDP was spectacularly booming from late 1980s. However, the growth of wages and productivity was almost stagnated ever since 1970s. At that times, economic globalization was taken place deeply and manufacture was moved from developed countries like America to developing countries like South Korea and Japan while financial capital field was tended to be more powerful.
The reduction in demand for medium-skilled workers, who carry out routine tasks that can be accomplished by machines, relative to both high-skilled and low-skilled workers further contributes to income inequality among full-time workers. Therefore, it is crucial to address these issues by promoting equal access to education and skills training to ensure that individuals from all backgrounds have the opportunity to thrive in an evolving labour market. Technology inequalities and age inequalities intertwine within the labour market, exacerbating disparities based on both technological proficiency and age, thereby influencing individuals' employment prospects and
FOr this to change, companies need to be less greedy. Factory workers should be paid more with productivity growth and universities should make the tuition more
1. Introduction Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap.
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
Adam Smith, David Ricardo or Karl Marx are known for many as the pioneers of contemporary economies. Their Work and researches were the bases of most of nowadays economic models used by countries around the world. Adam Smith, David Ricardo and their followers were labeled as the classical economists when later on Karl Marx and his followers were labeled as the Marxists. These two economic schools were some of the biggest in history, but yet differed in many ways. Through this paper, we would discuss the says of the Classical and Marxism schools concerning their views on wages, their different opinions about the theory of value, their sides about capital accumulation and finally the different point of view of the schools regarding the diminishing returns.
When beginning any talk about economics, the developments of advanced societies, political theory, and its sociological implications, certain theories come up quite often. Many times they are criticized, other times they are elevated and praised. Three that seem to stand out the most are modernization theory, dependency theory, and globalization theory. I plan to examine what each theory is, how they compare, and really delve into global inequality in light of what is previously discussed.