1. Read the following chapter and comment on the connection between social responsibility and the concepts of positive and negative liberty. Refer to at least two ethical philosophers mentioned in the article. Include the concept of neo-liberalism. Social responsibility theory is where "the media take it upon themselves to elevate their standards, providing citizens with the sort of raw material" (Nerone, J 1995). This means businesses should provide what is beneficial for the society by focusing on consumer interest. The concepts of negative liberty and positive liberty is that negative liberty focuses on "freedom from" while positive liberty focuses on "freedom to" live life the way you prefer (C., 2016). Both liberties have advantages and …show more content…
Do you think community rehabilitation and disability studies students and professionals have an obligation to participate in political advocacy and social movements? If so what type of social action do you participate in or intend to participate in throughout your professional career? I strongly believe that as for being a student studying rehab and disability studies, we should participate. We must voice our opinion and be part of political advocacy and social movements because if this is the field we are planning to work under it is necessary we are exposed to issues these individuals are dealing with. If we have no knowledge on the difficulties they face, I feel like it would be hard to build rapport. Also, having that experience and learning will be beneficial in order to gain public's attention on why we need more support towards people with disabilities. People are still being discriminated towards having some type of disability if we can voice our opinion why it's not okay to treat them differently can also create a big impact on the way they are being treated every single day. If we can participate and be an advocate for social movement then we can help to fill the missing pieces of our …show more content…
Especially when Sarah said her narrative was a powerful beginning of her journey (Tremonti, 2016). What I understand from is that everyone is always so quick to assume or make up a story when they see someone disabled. They assume they are incompetent, so Sarah wanted to push herself out of the norms of what people believe which is to show that she is capable, powerful women that doesn't define who she is by her disability. She wanted to prove them wrong. Rana was also told discouraged by people saying she didn't have the potential (Tremonti, 2016) because everyone wants to know their story but also want to make up their own version on what these individuals are capable of doing not knowing they are as talented as we are. We need to move away from this idea and let them live the way they
More recently than ever, the treatment and the representation of the disabled has become an important topic of discussion, with many disabled persons speaking out on the stereotypes of disability and lack of proper portrayal in the media. In her essay “Disability,” author Nancy Mairs describes her life as a woman living with multiple sclerosis, and she examens the lack of accurate portrayal of disability, especially in the media. Similarly, Andre Dubus adds to Mairs’ argument in his essay “Why the Able-Bodied Still Don’t Get It” by elaborating on how his life changed after becoming disabled, an experience that allowed him to understand why the disabled are still stereotyped and how this causes the abled-bodied to not fully understand what it’s
Nancy Mairs comes into view as a woman who recognizes who she is. Mairs knows she can do anything she sets her mind too. She doesn’t let her disability stop her from what she manages to do. She has put herself to deny what she has giving her a positive outlook on what she can do. She says in lines 10-11 “I want them to see me as a tough customer.”
In this paper, I am going to discuss and explain my opinions on why company Q is or is not socially responsible. Company Q recently closed a couple of stores in high crime areas. Company Q also started offering very limited health conscious and organic products. The local food bank has contacted Company Q requesting day old food for donations. Company Q has declined the donation request due to possible fraud by its employees and has started throwing the food away.
A disability can make someone look at a "disabled" person in a specific way, even though they are just as capable as others of doing things. Some people don't realize the impact someone with a disability can have on the world because they are limited and criticized for their issues. People without disabilities can show what they have, and those with disabilities will never even get past the starting line because of people's biased views on disabilities. After listening to the Ted Talk by Keith Nolan, a private cadet, he established ethos, logos, and pathos through his educational speech on the deaf in the military. In the Ted Talk, Keith Nolan backs up his story with emotion, statistics, credible information, and real-life experience.
Her reason for defining herself as a cripple is because she wants “[society] to wince.” She uses the astonishment of society towards “crippled” to her advantage in order to change their image of her into a tough woman. She constantly uses a word that is despised my many to make her seem as though she is someone who does not care about other’s opinions, but rather as someone who does what she believes is right. Her depiction makes her seem like a mentally strong woman. One of her most powerful phrases is when she denies that she has “lost anything in the course of this calamitous disease.”
While I do not have a disability, my brother does, and I will never understand what he has gone through. I will never have others underestimate or infantilize me, because they think that having a disability hinders people from being successful. Nevertheless, I am in a unique situation that allows me to see how the world cannot completely comprehend what it is like for those with disabilities. I straddle between never fully understanding and seeing more than what most non-disabled individuals can
When someone thinks of someone with a disability, they usually feel bad for them. They will also associate the word disability with a disadvantage. What if that wasn't true? What if instead of being at a disadvantage, people with disabilities just have to look at the task differently? As Oscar Pistorius, the
I created my own group where I teach youth who has been labeled with a “disability” how to dance. My dance group is going on its second year and we have already been on America’s Got Talent. I am apart of many groups such as QUAAD (quality urban alliance approaching destiny), CADCA (community anti-drug coalitions of America), anti-bullying groups and so much more. I want to leave a mark on the world to show that “the only disability that one might have is the one that makes them think they have one”-Jaziah
What a facilitator can do to open the eyes of people that don’t have a disability is to talk about it, answer questions, make it ok to talk about rather than them thinking the wrong things about people with disabilities. While in the documentary a group of kids watched one of the U.S. Wheelchair Rugby games afterwards, they got to get the players autographs and talk with them. The kids were open to ask questions to the players. In one scene a little girl asks pro wheelchair rugby player, Bob Lujano how he lost his arms and he calmy said from a blood disease when he was little thinking he scared the kids he said to them that he’s alright and that’s all that matters in the end that he’s alive (Murderball, 2005, 48:42).
Negative liberty was defined in terms of the absence of restraint by government. Basically saying the government does not control me. In negative liberty the individual experiences liberty in the extent that the power of government is limited. In this view the government should be limited. The focus in classical liberalism is on natural rights.
However, the prominence of classical liberalism started to decline towards the end of the nineteenth century due to the emergence of poverty and socialism as an alternative ideology. Consequently, British liberal thinkers including T.H. Green and L.T Hobhouse set out to propose a revised or new liberalism, commonly known as “social liberalism.” As opposed to classical liberalism, social liberalism would focus on social reforms through expanding the state's role. Thus, social liberalism revolved around the concept of positive freedom (or ‘freedom to’ achieve one’s goals) and its key tenets consisted of introducing state intervention (and its duty to ensure the wellbeing of its inhabitants through the elements of healthcare, shelter and education,) an emphasis on equality, a more regulated economy and redistribution of
For negative freedom, it is the sphere of control and for positive freedom it is the question of who is in control (129). The driving question for “positive” political freedom is “what or who, is the source of control or interference that can determine someone to do, or be, this rather than that” (Berlin, 122). This sense of political freedom requires a person being his own master and not relying on any outside influence (131). Positive political freedom is about man thinking for ones self and deciding for ones self, thereby establishing who they are to the world, on their own accord. Rationality and reason are also central to this sense of political freedom.
Being socially responsible is the idea that businesses should balance profit-making activities with activities that balance benefit society; it involves developing businesses with a positive relationship to the society which they operate. Social responsibility is an ethical theory, in which individuals are accountable for fulfilling their civic duty but the actions of an individual must benefit the whole of society. Social and civic responsibility should be an automatic thing that should come to people’s minds when trying to improve society. The main concept of social responsibility is that every individual, has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems.
Negative liberty is the absence of barriers, condition and constraints and positive liberty is the acting in such a manner to control one’s life and realize their fundamental purpose of life. Negative liberty is attributed to individual entity whereas positive liberty is attributed to collectives. The answers to both the liberties may overlap. The difference between the positive and the negative liberty can be understood in terms of factors that are internal to the person and factors that are external respectively.
While both libertarianism and social responsibility theory take pride of their freedom from any government support and funding and that they are privately owned, they somehow differ on how privatization affects their audience response. Libertarianism, however they banner a free press, leans toward pleasing their audience and those who fund them. Social responsibility, on the other hand, takes into account their responsibility to the people which is to deliver high-quality content – such as investigatory reports and documentaries among others – regardless if this is something that their audience would like or not.