Almost all articles, for or against the raise, agree that as long as the poverty line is not adjusted, then state and federal services that low-income workers were previously using would decrease. This means that the money that is no longer being distributed in food stamps or other services can be returned to Washington, D.C. and be redistributed. Economists say that raising the Federal minimum wage to $9 will restore the dollar to its real value (The President’s Plan). And indexing the minimum wage would ensure that working families keep up with inflation. Many economists say that by raising the Federal minimum wage by $2 would increase the unemployment rate significantly. However, the Congressional Budge Office said in 2006 said that
After reading these two letters I believe, that employees who recieve tips should be getting paid the same minimum wage as other employees. I speak from experince from my old job, I wasn't getting paid the minimum wage that other employees were getting. So i know how these employees feel. They have to count on tips as a major part of there income, that is unfair.
Minimum wage would raise the wages of many workers and increment benefits what disadvantaged workers. An estimated 6.9 million workers would receive an incrementation in their hourly wage if the minimum rage were raised to $10.15 by 2015. Due to the spill over effect the 10.5 million workers earning up to a dollar above minimum wage would withal be liable to benefit from an incrementation. Women are the most astronomically immense group of beneficiaries from a minimum wage increase. Sixty percent of workers who would benefit from an incrementation are women.
One reason that raising minimum wage would help the economy is that it gives a change in income. Generally, an increase in income increases the demand for goods at all prices. If a worker has more money due to a raise
5). Raising the minimum wage may also help cut back government assistance, such as SNAP or cash assistance, which is ultimately beneficial to our economy. Besides helping the economy, we, as American citizens, need to help our fellow Americans.
There are often many stereotypes about who is actually making minimum wage. Many will come up with stereotypical demographics to feed their agenda. According to the Minimum wage report, the majority of Pennsylvania minimum or below wage earners are 16-25 year old, white women. These women more often than not are un-married, and or non-high school graduates. 10 percent of workers making minimum wage in Pennsylvania are single parents, and another 10 percent have one or more children.
Increasing the minimum wage only does positive growth because “...authors found little or no evidence of a negative association between minimum wages or employment”. ("How Does a Federal minimum Wage Hike Affect Aggregate Household Spending?”) Increasing the minimum wage will only cause positive growth in a topic of employment. Raising the
From the first glance, the rise of the federal minimum wage is beneficial to everyone. It will improve living standards and the country’s overall economy, create more job opportunities, and reduce the poverty rate. However, after analyzing some economic theories and reading presumption made by qualified economists the idea of increasing the federal minimum wage will not look as good as before. Oppositely to benefits the raise may adversely affect standard of living, cause layoffs and fewer hirings, or has negative effect on poverty rate. Both points of view show the significant impact that the raise of the federal minimum wage may cause and both of them are partly correct.
We find no evidence that minimum wage increases between 2003 and 2007 affected overall state poverty rates. ”(Leigh, A. (2007) Proposals to increase the minimum wage are politically popular because they are widely seen as an effective way to help the working poor. In spite of it, state and federal minimum wage increases between 2003 and 2007 had no effect on reducing the poverty rates. “Minimum wage increases have thus far provided little more than symbolic support to the working poor.”
According to the law of supply and demand, when a good goes up in price the demand for that item will decrease. In the labor market, labor is a economic good, when the price for labor goes up the demand will decrease. When setting a price floor, in which the price cannot dip below that rate, there will be a surplus of that good if the price floor is above the equilibrium price. The equilibrium price for low skilled labor in many areas is above the federal minimum wage, but in the areas that this is not true there have been large amounts of unemployment following dramatic increases in the minimum wage (Soergel). When a higher minimum wage is enacted the number of available jobs for low skilled workers will decrease.
A person working full time at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour earns $15,080 in a year, which is 20% higher than the 2015 federal poverty level of $12,331 for a one-person household under 65 years of age, but 8% below the 2015 federal poverty level of $16,337 for a single-parent family with a child under 18 years of age (procon.org pro#2). If you put the minimum wage at $9.00, people will be able to live comfortably without unemployment rates going up. However, raising the minimum wage
This would make it where people wouldn 't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Raising the wage slightly would also make it so the price of goods wouldn 't have to be raised. The Economic Policy Institute stated that a minimum wage increase from the current rate of $7.25 an hour to $10.10 would inject $22.1 billion net into the economy and create about 85,000 new jobs over a three-year phase-in period. This raise increase would be easy to implement and would help the economy. By implementing this new minimum wage many problems in America can be solved.
In conclusion, a federal minimum wage increase will significantly improve the standard of living of low-wage workers. To meet their basic needs, workers must be given a living wage. It is not only morally correct to do so, but also beneficiary to both ends. The increase in wages allows for a more supportable income, but it also stimulates the economy.
There are a lot of potential benefits for an increase in minimum wage and on the surface it’s hard to see why you wouldn’t want to increase the wage. One of the clearest to see is that an increase to the minimum wage will also increase the spending for each household during the following years. So it works to help stimulate the economy in whatever area you increase the minimum wage. Along those same lines increasing the minimum wage will lead to a decrease in poverty as well. With the decrease in poverty you will also see a decrease in government spending on welfare items because the individuals receiving the higher wage in theory will be able to pay for these services/welfare items without assistance.
Many argue that an increase in minimum wage will help guide low skilled workers out of poverty and assist them into having a better career. That is not necessarily true, Many economists can agree that minimum wage jobs such as cashiers, host or a hostess are not jobs that meant to support a family. If anything by raising the minimum wage, it will put more people in poverty than guide them out of poverty. A raise in minimum wage will cause loss of jobs, an increase in the inflation rate, increase in
Our motion stated that “ The government should set minimum wages to reduce poverty and inequality. I was arguing against the said motion. Although it isn’t mentioned in the motion, we mainly argued using Singapore as an example. I think that our motion is a bit vague, as the minimum wages can reduce wage inequality hypothetically, but only to a small degree, and there are more feasible solutions regarding solving the prevalent issue of poverty. To sum up, I was not trying to argue that minimum wages won’t reduce inequality/poverty, but that it is ineffective and there are better alternatives to it.