1. Start with the victims. What kind of family is the Clutter household? In what way does Capote create sympathy for them? Do you feel they represented the American Dream? The Clutters were a close knit, God fearing Methodist family, and well known in their community. Mr. Herb Clutter was a devoted father and husband. He was well educated and respected in the agriculture industry. He was a self-made man and owner of the River Valley Farm. He was a fair man, but had his rules. As a father, he was a role model who never drank, smoked, or swore. He and his children were very active in the community. For example, they were leaders in the Finney County 4-H Club. They were not without their problems however. Mrs. Clutter suffered from post-partum …show more content…
This literary non-fiction is very different from straight crime reporting. In straight crime reporting, the identities of the victim and motive of the killers are revealed, but their backstory remains hidden from the public. The focus is on the facts, and the experience is personal only to the people directly involved. 7. What does the crime reveal about the town of Holcomb? How does the gossip surrounding the murders reflect underlying truths about the town? The murder of the Clutter family shocked the Holcomb community. This tight knit community began to distrust one another. People couldn’t sleep and the children were scared. At home, the doors were now locked and the lights kept on. Some gossiped about possible motives, and many believed the killer or killers were among them. 8. Does In Cold Blood have a protagonist? Is it Herb Clutter? Dewey? Perry? …show more content…
Capote mentions the older sisters, but since they had lives of their own, away from the River Valley Ranch, their descriptions are unnecessary. 10. What role does "dreaming" play in the novel, both figuratively and literally? Think of Perry's dream of the parrot and of finding gold in Mexico, and of Dewey's nightmares. How reliable is what Capote tells us about these dreams? Dreaming 11. How is montage used in In Cold Blood? In other words, how does the back- and-forth description of events in Holcomb and events surrounding Dick and Perry make the novel more vivid? 12. Is In Cold Blood a creative work? Is it more than journalism? Why or why not? Does the fact that Capote likely altered some of the dialogue and characterization in the book affect its merit as an example of the nonfiction novel? Does it affect your enjoyment of the work? 13. Capote seems to paint Perry in a more sympathetic light than Dick. He seems sensitive and even kind at points; however, by the end we find out that Perry committed all four murders. Were you surprised? Did you sympathize with Dick more than Perry? 14. How does Capote humanize the killers? 15. Did the book make you think differently about violent crime? About the death penalty? Why or why
One might want to read this novel, to see what makes an average man want to kill and to also see their psychological being leading up to it. This creates a mystery in the eyes of the reader to see why they did such a horrendous crime. The author’s purpose for writing this novel was to give the reader a different perspective on criminals. Capote uses a sympathetic tone when he talks about the histories of the criminals. He creates an emotional connection between the reader and the criminals because Capote allows the reader to get to know the criminal’s pasts, telling of the hardships the criminals have faced throughout their lives.
Considered an inauspicious dot on the map, Holcomb was a town that everyone passed by and regarded as a typical farm community until November 14,1959, when a terrible tragedy occurred. Four member of the Clutter family were murdered: Herb Clutter, the father; Bonnie Clutter, his wife; Nancy Clutter, their daughter; and Kenyon Clutter, their son. Herb and Bonnie also had two daughters who were fortunately living away from home at the time. In the first few chapters Capote describes the Clutters as a caring family, who were an integral part of Holcomb’s
A Town in the Ruins Although Capote begins by conveying Holcomb as a simple, unknown place hidden ¨out there¨, he then portrays Holcomb as a distraught town that has been changed for the worst; therefore pinpointing that small-town murders are substantial in altering the movement and livelihood of any town, as it can become a murder itself. As to illustrate the events, Capote uses descriptive and parallel structure to describe the shift Holcomb has experienced after the taste of pure evil washed through. As Capote describes an occurrence on the Sixteenth of November, ¨..the quartet of old hunting companions had once again gathered to make the familiar journey, but in an unfamiliar spirit and armed with odd, non-sportive equipment--mops and
The Clutter family were a well-respected farming family that had no enemies, and no disagreements. Although the Clutter were very wealthy, Mr. Clutter never stored his wealth in the house. The whole district and eventually the country was shocked by the unusual, random and brutality of the act. The two men, Dick Hickcock and Perry smith, in which didn't even know the Clutter family entered their house and murdered the family
The last section was my least favorite. It seemed as if Capote kind of ran out of ways to write so he began to throw things together. It involved him comparing the other stories related to murder instead of him writing more about Dick and Perry 's murders. You could sense Dick kept trying to get out of the death penalty while Perry sort of gave up. I think the underlying themes of this book involve wealth, family, self-image, and mental issues.
In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote, epitomizes the varying sentiments associated with the murder of the Clutter family; these emotions range from shock, to grief, to pride, and everything in between. However, through Capote’s specialized descriptions about each character, the relationships between their feelings and their actions become further elucidated. As a result, the readers begin to feel sympathy for the victims, their friends and family, the investigators, and even those who brutally murdered an innocent family. In order to create this connection, he utilizes the rhetoric device of pathos to strengthen the audience’s ability to sympathize.
Ethos is used to convey the power and importance of the Clutter family, and how strongly repercussions of their death affected the town. Truman calls Mr. Clutter, the man of the family, “... the community’s most widely known citizen…” (10) which establishes that he is well-respected and loved by the community, thereby establishing that he has good ethos. Logos is used to portray the eeriness of the crime through very cut and dry factual details. These details are very gruesome, such as when Capote described the corpses of the family after they had been killed. Capote describes that Clutter “[had] been shot… his throat had been cut, too.
In the book, “In Cold Blood,” Truman Capote takes us through the lives of the murderers and the murdered in the 1959 Clutter family homicide, which transpires in the small town of Holcomb, Kansas. The first chapter, “The Last to See Them Alive,” vividly illustrates the daily activities of the Clutter family—Herbert, Bonnie, Nancy, and Kenyon—and the scheming plot of Dick Hickock and Perry Smith up to point where the family is found tied up, and brutally murdered. In doing so, he depicts the picture-perfect town of Holcomb with “blue skies and desert clear air”(3) whose safety is threatened when “four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives”(5). Through the eyes of a picture perfect family and criminals with social aspirations, Capote describes the American Dream and introduces his audience to the idea that this ideal was no more than an illusion. Herbert Clutter: the character Capote describes as the epitome of the American Dream.
Contrastingly, the opposite opinion is revealed through the character Alvin Dewey in the book. Capote writes about Dewey’s beliefs on the case: “[The Clutter family] had experienced prolonged terror, they had suffered. And Dewey
Exigence/Relevance Many murder reports and atrocities pervade the news today, but rarely do writers go into as much detail as Capote did with In Cold Blood. Although it was just about four of the countless murders that have occurred in history, In Cold Blood is still relevant today because of the way Capote wrote it. Its detail and descriptive nature allows the readers to familiarize themselves with the murderers in an unprecedented fashion.
Facts and Fiction: A Manipulation of Language in Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood English is a fascinating and riveting language. Subtle nuances and adjustments can easily change the understanding of a literary work—a technique many authors employ in order to evoke a desired response from their readers. This method is used especially in In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, a literary work which details a true event about the murders of four members of the Clutter family in the small community of Holcomb, Kansas, in 1959. Although Capote’s 1966 book was a bestseller nonfiction and had successfully garnered acclaim for its author, there is still a great deal of confusion about the distinction between the factual and fictional aspects in the book.
Capote demonstrates his purpose through the use of extraordinary syntax. During the introduction of the novel, the sentences are lengthy and structurally complex, in the same manner
Although Truman Capote attempts to illustrate the humanity in the murderers, Mr. Capote’s primary goal is to separate the two murderers’ characters; therefore, he claims, not all murders are equally as guilty. Mr. Capote humanizes the murderers, creating a sympathetic tone towards the killers. When the crime of murdering the Clutter family was committed, it did not just end the lives of the family, rather, Capote says that, “...four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives” (Capote 5). Through the use of a paradox, Capote demonstrates how the murderers are not shown as monsters, but rather humans.
Mr. Clutter’s desire to serve, and his high moral standards bring him the admiration of all with whom he comes in contact. Using only about an eighth of the book to introduce the Clutters and familiarize the reader with each member of the family, Capote shows that their personalities are clearly defined in great detail by the time the crime is committed. Herb is described as a model citizen, loving father, loyal husband, trusted friend and decent employer: “…he is known for his equanimity, his charitableness, and the fact that he paid good wages and distributed frequent bonuses”(Capote 10). Even one of the killers, a former employee, attests to Herb’s sense of fairness: “I thought he was a very nice and gentle man… I thought so right to the moment I cut his throat” (Capote 296).
Though Capote rarely, if at all, explicitly disparages Hickock or laudates Perry, his tone and overall construction of the book subtly undermine the reader’s morals, subsequently leading them to sympathize for Perry. Through Capote’s exquisite diction and use of phrases such as “flawlessly devised,” he befittingly portrays Hickock’s lack of remorse . Out of context, the words themselves suggest Dick was a satisfactory deviser, however, upon closer inspection, Capote’s disparaging tone shines through, enabling the reader to discern Dick’s impenitent actions, establishing Perry as the more humane of the two. Due to Hickock’s callous personality and Capote’s admiration for Perry, the author’s difficulty masking his contempt for Dick invokes a seeping bias,