ipl-logo

Reasons For The Great Compromise Of 1877

882 Words4 Pages

During 1877 the unclosed arrangement to describe the future plan of the south and the reconstruction of the land was decided in a meeting between the new president Rutherford B Hayes. They decided that south would let him be president after the election of 1876, where Hayes would withdraw federal troops out of the border of the south and which would end the Reconstruction Era of the south. This compromise would lead to abandonment of supporting blacks for their civil rights where the Northerners fought for during the American Civil War. Years after the Civil War ended the most controversial election in American history happened. Where it was between Republican Rutherford B Hayes and Democrat Samuel J Tilden where Rutherford B Hayes would win …show more content…

The Great Compromise of 1877 would solve the problem of the land in the South and the government that controlled it, but it would betray the African-Americans and would lead to the future development of the Jim Crow South, Future terrorizing of African-Americans, and for the government no longer supporting their freedom and their rights. The Great Compromise would lead to the Jim Crow South which was an idea made by a group of people, but made into reality where they would push for it to be implemented into the government. Where the African-Americans would experience segregation and the slogan that would help support this segregation was “separate but equal” where African-Americans were not treated equal. They would have worse bathrooms, schools, water fountains, parks , chairs and such because of this segregation. They would not be treated equal by some Americans putting signs like “No Blacks …show more content…

The government, which was controlled by former confederates, would ban African Americans from going to the office because they hated them. They would put racial, bias laws that would try to stop African-Americans from being free and being a citizen. They would also threaten them with their lives if they voted for opposing laws that aided them. Also the black majority would be out of jobs, especially the ones in the government and in “1901, last black representative lost his seat in congress”(PBS, Public Broadcasting Service). They would run out the power of African-Americans and they would finally have no say in what laws were passed or the injustices they were being faced. They would just accept the new racist laws that were passed because of former confederates running the office once again due to the Compromise of 1877. Due to the compromise it would take African-Americans 30 years to finally have a seat back in the office where they could have a say in what laws were being passed and such. It would take them that long because of what the white people would do to them, mostly killing or hanging the smartest if African-Americans so that they wouldn’t have a chance to run against them. The white people would keep the African-Americans in check and would oppress them for year and years to come until the civil rights

Show More
Related

  • Dbq On Reconstruction

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    How would reconstruction have ended if Abraham Lincoln was assassinated and was able to enforce his reconstruction plan? How would the Emancipation Proclamation be enforced in the previously Slave-South? Would we enforce it differently than the Fugitive Slave Act?

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1820 Tensions Between 1820 And Proslavery

    2521 Words  | 11 Pages

    Event Issues Events Outcomes Relation to CW Missouri Compromise of 1820 Tensions between proslavery and antislavery began to rise within the US Congress. Also the balance of power in the Congress was trying to be achieved as well. Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state in 1819. In result of this request, they made a two-part compromise allowing Missouri to be a slave state, but in order to balance the states out, they made Maine a free state.

    Read More

  • Marion Barry Research Paper

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    They would disappoint real leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. who fought for justice. Instead of making the government stronger, corrupt leader such as Thomas and Barry weaken the system and give African Americans a bad reputation. This is why is it important know things like this actually happen and we can not make the same mistake to have someone unworthy in office even it goes against black protectionism. We should be supporting the ideal candidate not someone who represents us

    Read More

  • What Is The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

    364 Words  | 2 Pages

    The compromise was a backhanded deal that decided the controversial election of 1876 between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden. This lead to a power vacuum that lead to the KKK and old confederate leaders being able to

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • What Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise

    205 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the thirty-four years, the slavery debate became a problem yet again. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise essentially shoved the slavery conflict out of view. Overall, I believe that the compromise resulted in the neither the North nor the

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation And The Great Compromise

    395 Words  | 2 Pages

    Compromise was a huge part of America 's history and was extremely useful when it came to the “Articles of Confederation.” The government was starting to realize the articles weren 't strong enough any more and weren 't helping control the citizens. The government said they needed to be revised so Virginia and New Jersey both made an attempt at fixing them. The Virginia Plan was written May 29,1787 and the New Jersey Plan was written shortly after on June 15, 1787. Both plans were preposals for forms of government and both had many flaws.

    Read More

  • Why Did Reconstruction Fail In The Civil War

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the union won the civil war in 1865 it gave millions slaves their freedom but there was a bigger process in rebuilding the south. As Andrew Johnson in 1865 new southern state leaders passed “Blacks Codes” to control the behavior of former slaves and blacks. Many people in the north were very upset about these codes. since the North was very upset with this indecent that happened. It wore away their supporter known as the presidential reconstruction and led to victories of the radical parts of the republican party.

    Read More

  • What Are The Effects Of Reconstruction By Eric Foner

    1449 Words  | 6 Pages

    The final agreement stated that if the Republican candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, “became president, he would recognize Democratic control of the entire South and refrain from further intervention in southern affairs” (Foner 198). Unfortunately, without the northern intervention, the Democrats governed the South with the idea that African Americans were not equal to them, causing negative effects while leaving the Reconstruction Era. Therefore, these arising issues began to nullify the work completed in the earlier part of the

    Read More

  • Was Reconstruction A Success Or Failure Essay

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Johnson offered a pardon to all Southern whites that were not leaders during the Confederacy and were not wealthy plantation owners (although most of these subsequently received individual pardons) which restored their political rights and all property except for their slaves which were now freed. “He also outlined how new state governments would be created. Apart from the requirement that they abolish slavery, repudiate secession, and abrogate the Confederate debt, these governments were granted a free hand in managing their affairs.” (Eric Foner 3) The Southern people responded by enacting the Black codes, which were laws that required African Americans to sign yearly labor contracts and in other ways sought to limit the freedmen’s economic options and reestablish plantation discipline, or in other words, return them to slavery using loopholes in the legal system.

    Read More

  • Failure Of Reconstruction Essay

    1136 Words  | 5 Pages

    The American Civil War that was started due to the controversy over slavery in 1861, was won by The Union supported by President Lincoln against the Confederate states. President Lincoln’s original goal during the civil war was to reunify the nation as quickly as possible and help both sides come to an understanding. After the Civil War ended in 1865, the newly formed United States’ reconstruction era began. The Reconstruction era was put into effect by the Congress in 1866 and lasted until 1877. The Union’s victory in the Civil War had given African Americans a new sense of hope, devastated the southern economy, and eased the history of disunity in American political life.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Compromise Of 1850

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort by the United States Congress that was drafted by Henry Clay, who was both the U.S. Senator and the House Representative of Kentucky. This compromise was a series of acts passed in 1850, attempted to reconcile Northern and Southern interests to preserve the Civil War. After the start of the Mexican-American War, conflicts about whether to allow slavery in those new territories to polarized Northern and Southern of the United States raised up. Northerners were in favor the Compromise, since they thought it’s a good chance to stop slavery. On the other hand, Southerners were against it, they thought it threatened their political power because the join of territory--California would disturb the balance of 15 free states and 15 slave states.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

    Read More

  • What If The South Won The Civil War Essay

    1037 Words  | 5 Pages

    The leadership of the U.S would be strictly non-colored. Leaders such as President Obama, Tim Scott, or Shirley Chisholm would not exist. The white people would rule the government causing many great laws to go out the window. Such as the civil rights act of 1866, The enforcement act of 1871, or even the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Life as we know it would be different.

    Read More

  • Was Reconstruction A Success Or Failure

    1000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Reconstruction a Failure or Success? Throughout the years, America has gone through many different political changes. Many presidents selected with different plans for our future. Sadly, many of those objectives have failed or came to an end.

    Read More

More about Reasons For The Great Compromise Of 1877

Open Document