In his open letter to Ann Coulter, John Franklin Stephens not only redefines the “R” word, and demonstrates the ways he has witnessed its usage, but while doing this Stephans also eliminates the excuses that Coulter could make about why she used the word. By defining the different ways that the “R” word could be used, Stephans is forcing Coulter, and other readers to reckon with their understanding of the “R” word. In doing this, Stephans is hoping that people won’t continue using the “R” word improperly. Before Stephens redefines the “R” word, he sets up the letter, and made some decisions that were crucial to making the letter as effective as it was. The letter is addressed to just Ms. Coulter but Stephens decided not to send the letter …show more content…
The first part shows that Stephens has either experienced being bullied, or has witnessed it. Stephens redefines the terms of the “R” word with two more possible examples of how it could have been used. Then he states that “Because, Ms. Coulter, that is who we are – and much, much more.” Again Stephens relates himself to the problem in a personal way by using the word “we”, also showing that he has most likely seen or gone through the problems first …show more content…
Doing this was crucial in Stephens attempt to make Coulter realize that she was in the wrong. This put Coulter in a position to really reevaluate why she used the “R” word, among the many other words that she could have used. Stephens is forcing Coulter, to recon with her own understanding of the “R” word. He is trying to make Coulter and other readers realize that society has taught people to use the “R” word wrongly. Stephens again makes the topic personally relate to himself as he states in his open letter “Well, Ms. Coulter, you, and society, need to learn that being compared to people like me should be considered a badge of honor.” He is also reinforcing the fact that Coulter wrongly assumed that linking the president to someone like him, would be an insult. Stephens closes his argument by conveying that no one overcomes more, than people like him
“The Case of Susan B. Anthony” by L.D. Blake is a document detailing a person fighting for women’s right to vote. It’s evident that she feels empowered by what Susan has accomplished. The author states in Par. 10 “Such courage and energy as hers deserve admiration, and what is more support” ,moreover, in the third paragraph, the sentence “The United States Authorities have, however, pursued these women with may almost be styled virulence.”. The importance of these quotes is evident in the way the author wrote them.
Civil rights leader and social activist Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a world renown correspondence, Letter From Birmingham Jail, in April of 1963, during a time when segregation was at it’s peak in the South. When King was making his mark in American history, the United States was experiencing great social unrest due to the injustice towards their colored citizens, which would lead to social rights rallies and unnecessary violence. In response to King’s peaceful protesting, the white community viewed “[his] nonviolent efforts as those of an extremist,” and subsequently imprisoned the pastor (para 27). King specifically wrote to the white clergymen who had earlier addressed a letter to him as to why he was apprehended, in which they argued that his actions were untimely and unconstitutional. In response, King emphasized that justice is never timely, and the refusal to acknowledge equal rights was inhumane and regressive.
From the title of Ann Coulter’s book If Democrats had any brains, they’d be Republicans it is evident that she is cynical towards the left wing. The Book goes on to discuss her perspective on all things wrong with the Democratic party, from their stance on foreign policy to gay rights. Through an extensive accord Coulter provides commentary on liberal stances that she believes are propaganda. The book covers her belief and reasonings as to why Muslims should be discriminated against, claiming that though not all Muslims may be terrorists, all terrorists are Muslim. It goes on to label liberals as baby-killers, asking why they wish to protect the environment so bad but do not aim to provide the same protection to children who haven’t existed the womb.
In the passage Nancy Maria prefers to call herself “cripple”. She finds “disabled” and “handicapped” to be inaccurate of her condition. Nancy Mairs uses tone, word choice, and rhetorical structure to convey feelings on the term “cripple”. Nancy Mairs tone throughout the passage was neutral. Statements like “I am cripple.
“Virtuous Arguments” Reading Response Through John Duffy’s written works, he stated that Rush Limbaugh’s sexist comments were insults towards the Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke. John Duffy describes in a well-written manner how critical it is to have knowledge in having an opinion towards a certain topic and commenting about it in a structured format. John Duffy states that rhetoric has taken a turn into a negative path to where people do not care about what they say anymore to the public. John Duffy suggested that Rush Limbaugh was being sexist towards Sandra Fluke on public radio. We should be respectful of other people’s beliefs and or values, because if we have dissimilar opinions we need to be cautious in verbalizing those thoughts so that we do not offend others.
“I became the mistress of Mr. Glenmurray from the dictates of my reason, not my weakness or his persuasion. ”(Opie, 88) As mentioned previously according to moral books and feminine ideology women’s virtuosity was associated with the preservation of their sexual chastity. If that would fail and they would forfeit their most prized quality then a breach of duty towards society would occur. This appears to have been Adeline’s case who, “out of regard to [her] own principles”(Opie, 1999: 41), desired to contract no marriage but to live a free and chaste love with the man of her heart.
Speaker: Alice Walker writes in a first person point of view. The speaker is a single mother who “never had an education” (Walker 49). She is a minority, and accepts the lower status: “Who can even imagine me looking a strange white man in in the eye?” (48). The mother refuses to challenge the people society deem as better than her.
Brent Staples, in his literary essay “Just Walk On By”, uses a variety of rhetorical strategies. The devices he uses throughout his essay effectively engage the audience in a series of his own personal anecdotes and thoughts. He specifically shifts the reader 's perspective towards the unvoiced and the judged. Within the essay, Staples manipulates several rhetorical strategies, such as perspective and metaphor, in order to emphasize the damage stereotypes have caused against the mindsets and perceptions of society as a whole. Staples illustrates how the nature of stereotypes can affect how we perceive others around us in either an excessively admirable light or, in his and many other cases, as barbaric or antagonistic.
”(128) Gay uses anaphora in order to emphasize important words and concerns she has. Another effective technique she uses is rhetorical questions. Gay begins talking about an eleven-year-old girl that was gang raped by eighteen men. She
In the reading Just Walk on By by Brent Staples, the topic of racial stereotypes surfaces from the man who gets racially profiled quite often as he explains his personal experiences. The author bluntly tries to pass the message that racially judging people is wrong and explaining how it makes the other party ,african americans, feel. When analyzing Staples’ message his rhetorical strategies play a huge role into how his message is perceived. He uses influential diction allowing each word to give an impact unmatched by any white man who tried to convey a black man’s thought process. Staples also appeals to his credibility with the obvious observation that he is a black man talking about his real life experiences.
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail addresses his fellow clergymen and others who critiqued him for his actions during this time. The clergymen along with others are addressed in an assertive tone allowing them to fully understand why his actions are justified. Throughout the letter critics are disproved through King’s effective use of diction and selection of detail. Martin Luther King opens the letter stating that the clergymen are being “influenced by the argument of ‘outsiders coming in” consequently he explains the reason for him being in Birmingham. In the opening of his explanation he states the injustices occurring, relating it to the prophets of eighth century B.C.
Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, a self-taught philosopher, poet and forward thinker, wrote many empowering poems that captured how she felt during the time she was living in. Two of which “Foolish Men” and “On her Portrait” express how she didn’t like the stereotypical roles women were put in during her life. These poems show true anguish and express a slight distain for men. In the poem “Foolish Men” Cruz starts off by explaining how men are so quick to blame women for their ailments but in actuality it is themselves causing them.
Furthermore, the quotation also goes on to explain that though their voices, women also lied to kill passer - by, making their voice in Kramer and Sprenger’s opinion a very significant trait of female
The phrase ‘Stepping into someone’s shoes’ is a common saying many people hear as children and it exists for a reason. Although it is a seemingly simple concept, it scratches the surface of a much grander and deeper conversation about how people think and understand. David Foster Wallace and Raymond Carver both explore the inner workings of perspective and understanding through looking at the very concepts that create and shape an individual 's personal views; such as awareness, love and abuse. While Carver takes a more traditional approach to the topic by using a conversation between four characters to convey his thoughts, Wallace’s dialogue takes the form of a lecture, directly addressing his audience with what he sees as the key to the truest