Was the Book Angel of Greenwood Historically Accurate? Have you ever read a historical fiction book? Have you ever questioned its factuality? Well, today that's exactly what I will be doing for the book Angel of Greenwood by Randi Pink. Randi Pink's novel Angel Of Greenwood was historically accurate. Randi Pink accurately portrayed aerial attacks in Angel of Greenwood. In the book Randi Pink states “Look up, he said to Dorothy Mae, remembering her longing to fly. Angel thinks they’ll drop a bomb. Is it possible? Dorothy Mae stopped moving and shielded her eyes for a better look at the plane’s underside. Dear God, she said simply. Get everyone out(Pink 261)!” This quote is one of the many times Randi Pink accurately wrote and described the …show more content…
I could see planes circling in mid-air, Franklin wrote in a 10-page manuscript on yellow legal pad that was discovered in 2015. They grew in number and hummed, darted and dipped low. I could hear something like hail falling upon the top of my office building... The side-walks were literally covered with burning turpentines balls. I knew all too well where they came from and I knew all too well why every burning building first caught from the top(Evans 2).”Both texts express real life during the massacre. They both show when whites were using aerial attacks in Greenwood during the massacre. Farell Evans and Buck Colbert Franklin, a survivor of the massacre, from history.com demonstrate that Randi Pink was accuracte when describing aerial attacks in her book, Angel of Greenwood. Another example of Randi Pink's factuality in the aerial attacks, in her book Angel of Greenwood, is when she states “But their brief beam of hope was darkened by the sound of the bomb dropping atop the Mount. The townspeople gasped in unison, and Isaiah yelled Out. Isaiah couldn’t tell the difference between sunrise and Mount Zion exploding(Pink 274).” This …show more content…
White men stacking crates of stolen tools from Mr.Odom’s hardware shop into their automobiles. Sipping taken sodas and licking pinched ice cream from Williams. (Pink 256).” As shown above, Randi writes about men and women stealing from the hard work of Greenwood, this idea is historically true. You can see that this is historically true when DeNeen L. Brown from National Geographic states “ They took everything they thought was valuable”, recalled Hooker, who died at 103 years old in 2018. “They smashed everything they couldn’t take. (Brown 16-17).”As you can see with this quote from National Geographic and Randi Pink’s quote from the book, what Randi wrote about white men and women stealing from Greenwood was historically factual.Randi Pink again does an amazing job of portraying the stealing that actually happened in Greenwood, in 1921. Another instance where Randi Pink was accurate when writing about white men and women stealing in Greenwood is when she wrote “She watched as their men cleared the way for them. Checking shops and boutiques twice over and then sending the women in to take what they wanted before it was all destroyed(Pink 257).” According to research done by The New York Times a mob of white men would go into stores and homes and take anything valuable they saw (Williams 36). This idea of women and men stealing from Greenwood is important. So Randi making sure that she portrayed this part of history correctly was very
The white press based on the book spread false cases of raping of the white women in Memphis even though there were no such cases and the white women were not showing hatred towards the
This town was very racist because of the time being. It was
At the very beginning of chapter 14, the violence towards people of color was made a prominent issue for the text as it went into the Memphis attacks as celebrating freed slaves were brutally attacked and even killed by ex-Confederates. Its these extreme acts of violence agents people of color depicted in Gordon Under Medical Inspection, and what happened in Memphis that lead to the Republicans of the time to push so greatly for protections to be put in place for the now freed slaves. Unfortunately, as Republicans, as well as the now freed slaves fought to get people of color more protections and rights to prevent further incidents like the Memphis attacks, the people of the south also fought to keep some manner of control over black people so that they could continue to treat them as they wished, even if they weren't their slaves. As these two sides fought progress of reconstruction was stagnated for both sides, causing everyone to suffer because of it, but mostly the now freed slaves who had to try and make a living for themselves in places that didn't want them to be there to begin with. In the end people of color in the south would continue to face violence against them just as it was depicted in Gordon Under Medical Inspection, even after the civil war had ended, with people forgetting that the message of the drawing was that even people of color can be scared by the cruel actions of other people who wish to control
Ida B. Wells wrote this document as a result of the lynchings of Thomas Moss, Calvin McDowell, and Henry Stewart, and this case was significant to Miss Wells because she personally knew the victims. These colored men owned and operated a successful grocery store in an area that had a competing grocery store owned by a white man. Due to the economic tension between the two stores, a white band caused a stir and had over one hundred black men dragged into jail on suspicion. Moss, McDowell, and Stewart were charged of raping white women. Because of these accusations, these black men were lynched.
In "Death in a Promised Land," Ellsworth explores the twin oral traditions that developed in the time that followed the massacre: one white and one black. According to Ellsworth, "the fact that the two communities saw the events of May 31-June 1 so differently had much to do with the different perspectives each brought to the massacre. (Ellsworth, 21). This shows that the whites believed they were being threatened whereas we know this wasn’t the case and that the blacks were simply protecting themselves from this massacre. This divergence in perspective shows how complex historical events can be, especially when there is 2 sides that are polar opposites of each other.
Many African-Americans were treated unequally after the Civil War. In source 1, the text states that racial tensions across the country were extremely high after the Civil War, and African Americans continued to deal with oppression (source 1, paragraph 1). This evidence proves that even though African Americans were no longer slaves after the Civil War, they still were being treated unfair. With that in mind, many African Americans had experienced horrible times during the 1800s just because of the color of their skin. According to source 1, back in the 1800s, there were “whites only train cars” and “blacks only train cars”, and the cars were not the same quality (source 1, paragraph 5).
In _The White Scourge_, Neil Foley uses a wealth of archival materials and oral histories to illuminate the construction and reconstruction of whiteness and the connection of this whiteness to power. Focusing largely on cotton culture in central Texas, Foley 's book deconstructs whiteness through a new and detailed analysis of race, class, and gender. The most intriguing aspect of this book is its comparison of the impact of whiteness on various ethno-racial classes and how each struggled in relation to the other to develop a meaningful existence. _
In addition, Blake mentions that the owners would not inform the freedmen with details, and no matter how much the slaves saved, they are still owning a lot of money according to the white man. Blake also mentions that these black sharecroppers did not demand for a better treatment from the white landowners, because as long as these freedmen worked, they were provided with anything they wanted. This only happens under the condition that these freedmen are efficient workers. On the contrary side, Blake mentions that if the sharecroppers demand for a better treatment, there is the possibility of it transforming into an argument and causing the white landowners to get angry, and when they do, a shooting could likely take
Washington, readers learn about the leading up to the Tulsa Race massacre. In the novel, it mentions a white woman's scream. The narrator says, “Yesterday, a white woman's scream swung the atmosphere so far that I could not catch it. Her scream lit an already angry brew, fueling and feeding a starving mob whose hunger was not for food” (Pink 206). According to the article “Tulsa Race Riot of 1921”, “On May 30, 1921, a young black shoe-shiner outside a white department store in Tulsa, Oklahoma, rode the elevator to the men's restroom.