Alex Hern’s text “AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability” gives us an insight into how the author feels about AI. He makes claims as well as his evidence are clear and can be read about in the following paragraphs. In one of his claims, Hern expresses his concern for people potentially losing their jobs to AI. He mentions that ChatGPT, an OpenAI foundation by Elon Musk, has “stunned onlookers with its writing ability, proficiency at complex tasks, and ease of use” (Hern). Additionally, he puts in that “ChatGPT has significant further capabilities” (Hern). His evidence used include experts, examples, historical, and definition. The author doesn’t seem to change the topic, which is significant for understanding his claim and where he is coming from. Although his evidence is strong and explains what all AI is capable of, he doesn’t explain how it will take the jobs of people or how it could affect us. Had he explained to readers exactly how this is a bad thing, it isn’t too clear on how he feels about his claim. He briefly goes over …show more content…
He gives readers an example on how to ask AI to give directions on how to steal a car and insists that “it will merrily give users detailed guidance on how to steal a car. He adds on to the list of what bad things AI could help you with, such as tips on “how to disable an immobilizer, how to hotwire the engine, and how to change the license plate” (Hern). Hern uses examples as his choice of evidence, and he stays on topic while doing so. Since his evidence gives the readers an example to explain how AI is easy to trick, it is sufficient. There are no flaws in his evidence that could throw off readers. What he could’ve done to strengthen his evidence is mention what bad things could happen if one were to take the advice of AI. In his final claim, he gives an explanation on how AI isn’t as innocent clean as it’s
In Episode 5, the podcast highlights how the cell phone records, presented as evidence by the prosecution, were subject to different interpretations. The defense argues that the cell phone tower locations do not definitively prove Adnan's presence at the crime scene. This gives evidence for the innocence of Adnan, but because it was not highly considered or used during the trial Adnan was still proven guilty. Additionally, DNA testing conducted on the crime scene failed to match Adnan's DNA, as revealed in Episode 9, weakening the prosecution's assertion of his direct involvement. The absence of concrete physical evidence connecting Adnan to the murder raises doubts about the validity of his conviction and the severity of his
The final piece of evidence I think is important is the cell phone towers. The service that was on Adnan’s phone which was AT&T said that the exact ping of the phone was not reliable because it was not accurate location. This evidence that the cell phone ping was not accurate was never brought up in court, which would of made it the evidence of the phone ping unreliable. This saying would ’ve helped Adnan in proving his innocence and make him one step closer to being a free
Evidence is the key to proving the point of the article. After stating your claim, it is the evidence that will help validate your
The case of Adnan Syed, a high school student who was arrested for the murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee, has been a topic of much debate and controversy. The prosecution built its case on circumstantial evidence, and Syed was convicted in 2000. However, the Serial podcast and the HBO docuseries, The Case Against Adnan Syed, have raised doubts about his guilt, and many people, including The Innocence Project, believe that he is innocent. Matt Hayward examines the evidence revealed in the Serial podcast and highlights the contradictions in the prosecution's case against Adnan Syed in his piece "Adnan Syed: Innocent or Guilty?" "There was no physical evidence linking Adnan to the crime scene," he claims.
AI or artificial intelligence is not a modern concept, but rather a field of research that dates back to the mid-twentieth century. More recently though, privately owned Open AI has created a chatbot that uses artificial intelligence to respond to human formed questions. Gaining a public interest, Chat GPT satisfactorily passed a UPENN Wharton Business Exam, ranking notable scores in the English section, but unsatisfactory levels in the math section. When tasked with comparing the principles of the transcendentalists with Christopher Mccandless from Into the Wild, GPT produces an unsatisfactory essay. Although Chat GPT compares the transcendentalist lifestyle of Christopher Mccandless and the Transcendentalists logically, many of the arguments
He gives a reasonable argument in the piece he explains and uses a lot of facts and kids. He also uses a lot more evidence and gives us facts that makes us believe his
According to law, to identify an individual as a criminal, physical evidence is required. Physical evidence not only determines the criminal, it also assists the detectives, to picture the crime out. Most importantly it supports the accused individual. Unfortunately, things weren’t fair for Adnan because his case was solely based on Jay’s verbal and eyewitness testimony which is most definitely not physical proof. However, even if his testimony was true, there were many suspicious reasons why it was not reliable.
Leonel Ramos Mrs.Harrell ENG 112 May 3, 2023 Final Exam Essay The articles “'Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” by Micheal Littman and the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr discuss the topics of the impact of technology. The articles discuss the same topic in a unique way but sway in view points. For example in the article “Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” Littman suggest that technology is not here to over take us and going to take over he suggest that AI is still in the work and has room to improve but we should use it to improve society.
This shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing
Everyone's favorite online shopping site, Amazon just aired a new commercial advertising their line of Alexa devices. This commercial was strategically designed to appeal to all audiences and persuade them to purchase an Alexa device. This advertisement uses many different rhetorical devices to appeal to an audience. These are pathos, logos, ethos, personification, repetition, colors, clarity and framing. An important part of this commercial was the use of well known celebrities to attract certain people.
In conclusion, both authors used different rhetorical strategies in their articles. Carr's perspective believes that if we’re not too careful and depend too much on automation. We will become less capable. He believes if this happens, there will be more robots than us.
“The special properties and technical complexity of digital evidence often makes it even more challenging, as courts find it difficult to understand the true nature and value of that evidence (Boddington, 2015)”. It’s not uncommon for innocents to be convicted and guilty people acquitted because of digital evidence (Boddington, 2015). However, other factors can also affect the validity of the evidence, including: failure of the prosecution or a plaintiff to report exculpatory data; evidence taken out of context and misinterpreted; failure to identify relevant evidence; system and application processing errors; and so forth (Boddington, 2015). “There is a perception, largely undeserved, that digital evidence somehow alters the true nature of the original evidence and is therefore unreliable. Presented properly, digital evidence is capable of being of tremendous assistance to the courts (Hak,
Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Artificial Intelligence has been a positive impact in the working field by being trained in less than thirty minutes to have common sense and adapt to the environment. In 2011, there was a sale hit of $8.5 billion worth of industrial robots sold. There is currently about 1.1 million working robots in the workforce reducing the delivery time by 20 percent.
It has eliminated entire classes of jobs, while creating new and more skilled ones to replace them. Yet, AI stands to disrupt
Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Literature Review The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, authored by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky, as a draft for the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, introduces five (5) topics of discussion in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ethics, including, short term AI ethical issues, AI safety challenges, moral status of AI, how to conduct ethical assessment of AI, and super-intelligent Artificial Intelligence issues or, what happens when AI becomes much more intelligent than humans, but without ethical constraints? This topic of ethics and morality within AI is of particular interest for me as I will be working with machine learning, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations for my upcoming summer internship at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Norco, California. After I complete my Master Degree in 2020 at Northeastern University, I will become a full time research engineer working at this navy laboratory. At the suggestion of my NSWC mentor, I have opted to concentrate my master’s degree in Computer Vision, Machine Learning, and Algorithm Development, technologies which are all strongly associated with AI. Nick Bostrom, one of the authors on this article, is Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University and the Director at the Future of Humanity Institute within the Oxford Martin School.