The Rhetorical Appeals of Margaret Chase Smith
The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union created paranoia and fear in the States. Rumours started spreading about Soviet spies in the government posing a threat to National security. On February 9th, 1950, senator Joseph McCarthy gave his “Wheeling Speech” to the Republican Women’s Club of Wheeling, West Virginia. His speech accused hundreds of members of the State Department of being communist sympathisers and spies. However, when asked for proof, he could not provide evidence to back any of his claims. (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. “Joseph McCarthy.”) On June 1st, 1950, Senator Margaret Chase Smith delivered her speech, “Declaration of Conscience” ridiculing his
…show more content…
She begins, “Mr. President, I speak as a Republican. I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States senator. I speak as an American” (Smith 621). She exudes pride in her gender to both address and dismiss common prejudice regarding the issue. Heavily emphasizing the achievements of the Republican party, Smith asserts how successful and trustworthy she is by association. At the same time she flatters and praises her party members. Smith states, “As a Republican, I say to my colleagues on this side of the aisle that the Republican party faces a challenge today that is not unlike the challenge which it faced back in Lincoln’s day. The Republican party so successfully met that challenge that it emerged from the Civil War as the champion of a united nation- in addition to being a party which unrelentingly fought loose spending and loose programs” (622). She directly references and separates herself from the ideals she disagrees with by saying, “As an American, I condemn a Republican Fascist just as much as I condemn as Democrat Communist. I condemn a Democrat Fascist just as much as I condemn a Republican Communist” (623), as well as, “As an American, I want to see our nation recapture the strength and unity it once had when we fought the enemy instead of ourselves” (623). The senator inspires patriotism and provokes a collective dislike of “the enemy” …show more content…
By voicing her own opinions as though they are the call of the collective, she is able to suggest mass unrest. She voices the thoughts of the nation when she says, “The American people are sick and tired of being afraid to speak their minds” (Smith 622) and “The American people are sick and tired of seeing innocent people smeared and guilty people whitewashed” (Smith 622). By phrasing it this way she brings authority to her claim. She is not calling for change alone, but voicing the feelings of the country. By saying, “The Democratic administration has completely confused the American people…” (Smith 622) and, “The Democratic party has greatly lost the confidence of the American people…” (Smith 622), Smith discredits the Democratic party while suggesting that all of America is unhappy with its
The significance of the address is centralized around the agenda of the Democratic-Republican Party to keep majority power, the ideology of unity in the States is more important than individual ability to dissent, the Federalist opposition to the party threatened American interests and the duty of Americans is to support with zeal “the struggle for freedom and independence” from their oppressors across the
How was it like to be an African American writer in the 1800s? Mary Ann Shadd Cary reveals just how hard it was to get her words out. On March 25, 1854, an editorial of hers appeared on the “Provincial Freeman” called “Why Establish This Paper?”. Mary Ann discusses the necessity of her newspaper by using rhetorical strategies such as personification, alliteration, and appealing to the readers pathos to establish her claim of freedom of speech Mary Ann uses personification and establishes her ethos to support her claim of freedom of speech. Within the first paragraph, she states, " As the great country grows we grow with it ; as it improves and progresses, we are carried forward on the bosom of its onward tide.
Shirley Chisholm became the first African American woman elected in the U.S. Congress and run for president as a Democratic candidate. Despite losing the presidential nomination Shirley Chisolm continued to be inspiration for young African American women across the United States. Chisholm was a great orator that used her voice to improve racial inequality and women rights for all Americans. Her speech given on the floor of the House of Representatives in 1968 will forever immortalize Shirley Chisholm’s dedication to improving human rights. The use of fallacies throughout her speech were used to captivate her audience and bring attention to the injustice that was going on in America.
She’s goes on to say that “woman are citizens also, they are people and that no state has a right to make any law or to enforce any old law that shall abridge their privileges”. (Anthony, 1872). She very vocal about wanting change in her speech. Change in the in the way things are thought of that will fix was is unreasonable at that
Shirley Chisholm was an American politician, educator, and author. In 1968, she became the first African-American woman elected to the United States Congress, and represented New York 's 12th Congressional District for seven terms from 1969 to 1983. On May 21, 1969 Washington D.C Shirley Chisholm delivered a speech to the United States House of Representatives about equal rights for women. Being an African American woman, Shirley personally was able to relate to the speech she gave. Based on her own personal proof and fueled by experience, her “Equal Rights for Women” speech was very persuasive.
In America’s history, child labor was fiercely criticized. Many activists of child labor laws and women’s suffrage strived to introduce their own viewpoints to the country. Florence Kelley was a reformer who successfully changed the mindset of many Americans through her powerful and persuading arguments. Florence Kelley’s carefully crafted rhetoric strategies such as pathos, repetition, and sarcasm generates an effective and thought provoking tone that was in favor of women’s suffrage and child labor laws. Florence Kelley uses pathos continuously throughout her speech.
With all of the accusations going around, people were forgetting that everyone can have their own opinion. Edward R Murrow, a television host of See It Now bashed McCarthy by saying “’We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty’” (Roberts, 2). Murrow was saying that just because a person disagrees with what the president or a government official says, does not mean they are a communist. The United States has freedom of speech, and citizens can say whatever they want about the government.
McCarthy manipulated the media, told outrageous stories about the communist conspiracy in the United States, and used his power and America’s fear to besmirch any opponents as “communist sympathizers” to make sure he remained at the top. Actually, most conservative members of Congress supported McCarthy because it helped them gain votes during elections. The majority of McCarthy 's movement attacked liberals and members of the Democratic Party and this aided anyone who was not part of those topics and organizations. Then McCarthy began to target the Army because they wouldn’t favor David Schine, one of his former investigators, who had been drafted in. “Senator Joseph McCarthy began hearings investigating the United States Army, which he charged with being ‘soft’ on communism.
This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American
Clinton attempts to use propaganda, empathy, and logic to present her point, that women to her audience, and succeeds at it. Overall, the speech is balanced in its argument style and use of rhetoric, such as the factors mentioned above. At this point, Clinton was not a New York senator yet, but only First Lady, yet she used her position to go to conferences, such as this conference, and speak out for women’s rights, as they are the same as human
Often in Smith’s speech she manifests simple anaphoras on the sentence level to portray her personal opinion. The three different anaphoras Smith establishes to shed light on her dispositions, are “I think that it is high time,”, “I am not proud,” and “I condemn”. Each of these sets Smith up to display her discontent with the Senate and how she hopes for a more dignified regime in the future. Smith’s anaphora in the beginning of her speech, “I think that it is high time,” implements exaggeration of her vexation towards the issues within the Senate that have been present for far too long. When she places the “high” in front of “time” it forms a new meaning to her repetition.
She also states that no state can deny women the right to vote because everyone is a person and half the population should not be discriminated based on who they are. The repeated use of the word oligarchy in the second half of the speech gives the word a very bad connotation since it talks about people ruling other people, even though everyone is born equally. The word oligarchy has a bad connotation since it means a small group of people
Judith Sargent Murray was a feminist long before the term was even invented. She lived through the American Revolution and was one of the first Americans to advocate for women’s equality. Her writing was carefully constructed to engage her audience and capitalized on the post-revolutionary fervor espousing the principle that all men are created equal. Murray’s essay effectively argued for gender equality through the use rhetorical style of logos.
Josie Appleton’s piece opens with her introducing the fact that body modification has lost its mark of being taboo. Appleton then transitions into describing the different kinds of people that modify their bodies and why they do it. The fact that people used to mostly use tattoos to identify with a group and are now using them to define themselves is heavily enforced. The rest of the piece describes in great detail the different ways people use piercings and tattoos to better understand themselves and mark important milestones. The piece concludes with Appleton claiming that body modification should only be for fashion, because bringing significance to it causes problems.
He said that at least 205 members of the State Department were members of the communist party. This was after it was released to the public that a couple named Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were secretly communist spies who were staying in the U.S., stealing nuclear weapon secrets. With McCarthy’s remarks such as “They [a communist spy] could even be your neighbor!’ scarring the American public’s mind, many were on edge.