Rhetorical Analysis Of Non Violence By Chavez
Aiden Schroeder
Mrs. DesLauriers
AP Language & Composition
11 January 2023
Resisting Violence: Non-violent Protest Perseveres Throughout Martin Luther King Jr.’s life, he advocated for nonviolent resistance to oppression and racism in America. The solution to the long lasting problem was found in his words and his strength of mind, rather than violence and physical strength. Today, the strategy of nonviolence keeps proving its effect. Using patience and fortitude effectively resists any oppressive force, so long as the masses hold strong. Chavez writes in the name of King Jr. and his success without violent measures. He emphasizes the downfalls of violence and the moral and ethical benefits of nonviolent resistance to oppression.
…show more content…
First, Chavez uses his tone to portray a general negative feeling towards violent protest. He does this through statements like, “many injuries and perhaps deaths,” and, “complete demoralization of the workers” (Paragraph 4). Chavez makes these points with a serious, dead-pan tone, to emphasize how much violent protest contrasts with nonviolent ones and the largely unsatisfying result. Violence, in his opinion, never works and therefore never should be used. The excerpt from Chavez also uses many instances of pathos to further dissuade readers from using violence to protest. Towards the end of the excerpt, he writes that “the poor, the workers, the people of the land” get killed in violent revolutions (Paragraph 12). In order to connect emotionally with his audience, Chavez appeals to the real-life conditions of the general public and how violent resistance will end up killing them before it accomplishes any goal. Life over cause shows as a theme in his writing, where protesting peacefully keeps your resistance alive, and violent revolts end up killing it. Third, comparing violent protest to nonviolent, Chavez uses longevity to emphasize why violence does not work. Stating that violence provides a temporary solution, Chavez says that ”people suffer from violence” and non-violence brings people together (Paragraph 11). Comparing these reveals that with violence, even when it succeeds, it only replaces an oppressive, violent force with another one. To accomplish revolution, non-violence holds the most leverage and gathers the most people. Concluding, Chavez successfully downplays violence as a viable option for resistance to oppression by rhetorically convincing his audience
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
337 Words | 2 PagesIn line 62 Chavez also provides a reference to Gandhi who was well known for his idea of nonviolence and promoting it. Next, Cesar Chavez uses logos as a rhetorical device
How Does Cesar Chavez Justify The Civil Rights Movement
632 Words | 3 PagesAssuming his establishment would achieve their objective, Chavez discloses that it would be intertwined with devastations. Comparatively, Chavez proposes that his behavior is undoubtedly modest when compared to such extremes. Cesar Chavez satisfies his audience with his civil rights movement by inferring its justness. Conspicuously, Chavez imposes a grotesque ending, “Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution?
A Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By Cesar Chavez
680 Words | 3 PagesThis passionate tone helps the reader infer Chavez strongly believes in his cause. He repeats of words such as “supports” and “powerful” to show the reader the effect of nonviolence on a person and a community. His appeals to justice make the article relatable to everyone because at a point in one’s life, one has been treated unjustly. Many of the claims presented help provide a connection between the reader and the author. An example of this can be “When victory comes through violence, it it a victory with strings attached”, which shows how violent revolts have many more consequences, which can include death.
Chavez's Argument About Nonviolence Resistance
426 Words | 2 PagesWhat literary devices did Chavez really use for his argument about nonviolence resistance? Although Chavez uses a variety of literary terms, he uses Logos, the appeal to logic and senses, and aphorism, which is a belief that expresses a truth or principle of life. Chavez uses Logos to bring his point that violent protests not only take away or injure innocent people, but actually may end up hurting your cause in general as it can lower “morale” in those who do support your cause. It can also make those who wish to support your cause not to due to your idea’s violent reactions to your opposition and what they stand for. “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
1065 Words | 5 PagesIn addition to reasoning, Chavez uses references to history to further explain his logistics. As said in the passage, “Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” Here, Chavez basically says why bother fighting physically, when the only ones getting killed or injured are the workers or rebels themselves.
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Assassination By Cesar Chavez
821 Words | 4 PagesThis is best exemplified by Chavez when he elaborates on violent tendencies since, “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers” (Chavez). From Chavez’s statement about violence approaches to solve problems it impacts the audience from the beginning as it makes them question and reconsider what actually gets accomplished by resorting to violent tactics. This also in return, develops the beginning of Chavez’s main argument as it abhors the use of violence to solve ethical/moral problems and shows that temporary solutions are the only thing to come from such
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez
403 Words | 2 PagesHis repeated use of the word “we” adds to his sense of collaboration. By showing the reader that he is not alone in his fight against oppression and discrimination, Chavez uses the implied “might in numbers” to his advantage. This same convincing tone can be seen in how he lists the benefits of nonviolence and problems of nonviolence and issues of nonviolence. He convinces by stating that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence” and it can “support you if you have a just and moral cause.” By refusing to give any ground to opposing viewpoints in his article, Cesar makes sure that the reader can understand all of his points without looking at any downsides.
Cesar Chavez He Revealed Us The Way Analysis
1099 Words | 5 PagesNonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is of crucial importance to win any contest” (Chavez 3). He applies words such as “powerful”, “moral”, and “opportunity” to uphold his purpose. Chavez’s diction in this quote conveys nonviolence to be both a reasonable and approachable method for solution, considering the positive outlook it holds for a society’s conflicts. Accordingly, the differentiation of connotations through particular uses of diction
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
1069 Words | 5 PagesHe uses logos in the form of looking at past history and analyzing the downfalls of violent resistance, to emphasize how violence has many strings attached to it, whereas the more peaceful nonviolent route allows for greater freedom and less risk to the general population. Heavy diction is used to create a separation between violence and nonviolence, shining a bright light onto violence as a negative way to deal with problems, while lifting nonviolence as a means of powerful hand to win any “competition”. It was important for Chavez to remind his audience that nonviolence is the method of choice when fighting for change as it was the 10th anniversary of MLK’s death, an important leader in the civil rights movement who used the power of nonviolence as a method to induce change for the black community. At the time of Chavez’s writing, many farmers were upset over a crash in the agriculture market, with many farmers left with little to no money and no help from the government. Chavez wanted to inform these people of the importance of nonviolence as a way to get their ideas through, as violence would resolve nothing and lead to greater disruptions which would affect the entirety of the American population.
Cesar Chavez's Argumentative Analysis
654 Words | 3 PagesHe writes that there are two possible outcomes from violence. The first being that the more violence present, the more there will be of fatalities and injuries on both sides of the conflict. The second result Chavez describes is that “there will be a total demoralization of the workers” (Line 20). People may see violence as the easiest and quickest way to accomplish change due to the fear they inflict on others. Mindlessly causing death and violence will force people to forget about the importance of innocent lives and justice.
Juxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech
662 Words | 3 PagesTo begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez
786 Words | 4 Pages(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct
Rhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article
409 Words | 2 PagesIn the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
651 Words | 3 PagesHe insists on the fact that inhumane vengeance will lead to injury and death, as well as “demoralization”. This argument is greatly supported by the death of Dr. King Jr; his view of nonviolence helped to grow and mature the farm worker’s movement. Civil workers are guilted into supporting their fallen hero in order to fulfill his dying wish. Chavez instructs them to “overcome… [their] frustrations” and support their causes through methods of peaceful protests. Chavez, appealing to their sense of emotion, manages to persuade a disconnected society by desperately wanting to avenge Dr. King’s untimely
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez
412 Words | 2 PagesThe audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of
More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Non Violence By Chavez
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
337 Words | 2 PagesHow Does Cesar Chavez Justify The Civil Rights Movement
632 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By Cesar Chavez
680 Words | 3 PagesChavez's Argument About Nonviolence Resistance
426 Words | 2 PagesCesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
1065 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Assassination By Cesar Chavez
821 Words | 4 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez
403 Words | 2 PagesCesar Chavez He Revealed Us The Way Analysis
1099 Words | 5 PagesCesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
1069 Words | 5 PagesCesar Chavez's Argumentative Analysis
654 Words | 3 PagesJuxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech
662 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez
786 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article
409 Words | 2 PagesCesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
651 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez
412 Words | 2 Pages