What is happiness? What does it mean to have the right to happiness? The right to happiness can be defined and explained in a variety of ways. Some believe that you have a direct right to happiness, others believe that you must earn it. Personally, I believe we have the right to pursue our own version of happiness as long as it does not interfere with the happiness or journey to happiness of others. In this rhetorical analysis I will be analyzing the work of C.S. Lewis’s “We Have No “Right to Happiness” and the film "Chef's Table” featuring guest star Cristina Martinez through a critical lens of psychology. While C.S. Lewis's essay "We Have No Right to Happiness" and Cristina Martinez's appearance on "Chef's Table" appear to be completely different …show more content…
They establish credibility for her food by providing positive feedback about her food and her restaurant. Craig LaBan discusses her food and says: "Her [Cristina Martinez's] barbacoa is not just some trendy food to be Instagrammed, it's the real deal. It's the kind of cooking that takes generations of family tradition and know-how, it's the kind of food that you can't fake." He gives her food and restaurant authentic credibility with this quote. Finally, The documentary makers and filmmakers utilize logos through the use of factual and logical arguments to back up what they're saying and shed light on major social and political issues. Filmmakers go deep into the history and cultural significance of the baraboca. By showing the traditional techniques Martinez uses when preparing barbacoa to highlight the difficulty it is to prepare and the difficulties she has to go through when running her authentic barbacoa …show more content…
C.S Lewis makes his argument in his article “ “We Have No “Right to Happiness.” He uses a story about two people who left their significant others to be with each other as his basis of his argument in the article. Analyzing this documentary from a critical lens of psychology I assume it is because of the way he was raised. Lewis was raised in a christian household where I'm sure his parents upheld him on his moral values which is why he disagrees on being selfish and causing the unhappiness of others. A good example of this is the study "Religion and Children's Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Inductive Reasoning Skills" by Jean Decety and his colleagues, published in the journal Current Biology in 2015. In the study researchers recruited children from non religious households and religious households to see which have more compassion and sympathy. Results from the study show that children from religious households show way more compassion and sympathy to others. Lewis uses pathos, ethos and logos, to support his argument of having basic moral
David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame the Eater” is an article about the dangers of the fast food industry and their direct correlation to childhood obesity. Through his argument, he shows the readers that the consumers are not the ones at fault. He provides great detail on how the cheap and convenient places for food are the ones to blame for the continuous growth of diabetes in our youth. Zinczenko gives a well-balanced argument as to why this is true through his use of personal stories, dictation, and tone. Through this, he is able to effectively prove his thoughts and opinions, and also include the reader into following along.
Still, it was not convincing enough to restrict processed foods and sugars completely. Director Laurentine Ten Bosch uses qualified experts to speak on certain topics and to enforce further the idea that sugar and processed foods are harmful. Throughout the documentary, many licensed professionals are introduced, along with their jobs and experiences. Some of these professionals include Daniel Vitalis, a traditional and wild foods expert (4:49), Jon Gabriel, an author and weight loss expert (5:30), and Jason Vale, an author and nutrition specialist (12:56). These experts discuss how sugary and processed foods affect the body and mind.
David Foster Wallace's article "Consider the Lobster" analyzes the agony that Lobsters feel when they are being bubbled invigorated to be devoured by Humans. He utilizes the lobster for instance to grow his examination, drawing out the relationship amongst people and the creatures that we devour. Wallace begins of his paper by saying the Maine Lobster Festival and its colossal horde of more than 80,000 individuals that devour more than 25,000 pounds of lobster amid the 5 days that the celebration keeps going. He begins off the paper with esteem in his tone as he depicts the Maine Lobster Festival to his perusers. After he's done lauding the celebration, Wallace uncovers
The objective of the film was to influence viewers to switch to a plant-based diet while avoiding animal consumption. Anderson and Kuhn utilize various visual techniques and rhetorical appeals to ethos and logos to support their argument that the causes of many diseases can be linked back to diet. While the film uses clear rhetorical techniques to present its argument, the overall argument is ineffective due to its broad claim and distorted presentation of positions. The first rhetorical strategy used by the film that will be analyzed is the appeal to pathos. An example of this would be the woman crying because she has to take medicine for the rest of her life.
In the article "Don't Blame the Eater" informs the parents and any fast-food consumers on the dangerous health effects fast-food can cause. Child obesity and type 2 diabetes have increased within the country, a possible factor for this kind of sickness can be tracked to fast-food, David Zinczenko attentively constructs his argument against teenage or child obesity and properly builds support for his position. His argument was achieved by his usage of humor credibility, and forced teaming. Together, these devices complete Zinczeko's mission while he remains considerate of the opposing side. Instead of opening his introduction with a tedious writing based on his future discussion points, he decides to craft his way into introducing his article with a bit of humor.
In the article, “ Don’t Blame the Eater” by David Zinczenko’s, he explains that it is not the children’s fault for eating fast food but the companies who keep expanding in local areas where it is-easier-for children to get a taste. Zinczenko agrees that it is not healthy for the body and it is a worldwide problem that most families are facing today. The villain in this true story is the industries that do not stop making these unhealthy fast food for children and spread advertisement all over the media. Don’t blame the eater, blame the government to make more strict rules on a healthy environment.
In the essay, A Movie, a Word, and My family 's Battle, by Patricia E. Bauer, Bauer effectively utilizes pathos, however, her argument to terminate the derogatory use of the word "retard" was ineffective due to the lack of structure and organization. With a complicated structure the reader becomes confused about the essay 's purpose therefore diminishing the argument of the essay.
Should We Consider The Lobster? Evaluative Essay About Wallace Article. I consider myself a food lover, and I also enjoy cooking. I love to cook elaborated dishes that I find on the Internet and magazines. One day I was curious of how to cook lobster, and when I started to read the magazine and how it explained that I had to cook the lobster alive my mind panicked and I did not continue reading.
In 2004, Gourmet Magazine reached out to writer David Foster Wallace to write about the well marketed Maine Lobster Festival. Though he did express his feelings towards this event, it presumably wasn't the perception Gourmet Magazine was expecting. Blinded by the heavy amounts of sarcasm, they published it anyways. Consider the Lobster dives into the disreputable actions of people cooking and consuming lobster. Anyone who reads David Foster Wallace’s Consider the Lobster will recognize his display of emotional appeal, sarcastic tone, and irony that highlights a controversy of American beliefs of the ethicality of eating lobster.
In August 2004, Gourmet Magazine published award winning novelist David Foster Wallace’s article “Consider the Lobster”. In the article, he focuses on the negative experiences he had at the Maine Lobster Festival. He later uses the opportunity to ask rhetorical questions about the morality behind cooking lobsters alive and if they feel pain while being cooked. Simply, the main question he poses is, “is it alright to boil a sentient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure?” (Wallace, 2004, p.4) Gourmet magazine was the first monthly publication exclusively for food and wine.
Foods, whether homemade or fast-foods are meant to serve one major purpose; satisfying hunger. Depending on quantity, food fills the void in the stomach to meet the primary need for satisfaction of hunger to supply energy to the body. The genre of this article was health; its entire argument was to give the reader the message that cooking at home is much healthier and better for you than eating at a restaurant or eating microwavable dinners. Bestselling food writer Mark Bittman makes the case that eating at home is good for your health, good for your family—and, with the right approach, far easier than you think. In the Time magazine article “The Truth about Home Cooking”, the author uses features such as, logos, pathos, ethos and tone to support their argument.
Zinczenko’s Rhetorical Precis In his essay “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko sympathizes for port fast-food patron, like himself ages ago, he agrees that food industry should take some responsibility for obesity. He supports his claim by warning consumers about the dangers of fast food,as it play a factor in obesity. Within his argument, he questions other counter arguments and uses his narrative tone to show consumers that the food industry is necessarily at fault. Zincenko believes the prevalence of fast food and the lack of healthier food alternatives is causing obesity in America.
In “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko explains that the only affordable meal choice for an American teenager is fast food. Zinczenko recognizes that families consume these food sources because of the numerous McDonald’s restaurants and the lack of grocery stores in the area. Zinczenko argues that “Some fast-food purveyors will provide calorie information on request, but even that can be hard to understand”(464). However, fast-food is not the blame as Zinczenko argues in the article it 's the consumer that is to blame. The consumer has the control to eat what they want.
Through all this, Lewis presents readers with a picture of God’s love and reminds Christians of God’s standard for human love. As previously shown, Lewis shows God’s love of man to be an incomparable, undeserving love. He gives a good, in-depth, and emotional picture of what God’s love is. Lewis is also reminding Christians that God has set a standard for their love, and that they and many others often fall short of this. He brings about a sense of conviction with this by having Christians think about this standard and how the way they love stands with or falls short of
Happiness can be defined in many different ways depending on who you are talking to. To me, it can be found listening to my favorite music with the volume turned all the way up. Through this experience I am able to immerse myself in something I truly love and be a be a better, lighter version of myself. For some, happiness is living in the moment and experiencing life as it passes, but for others it means living a life of virtue. Though happiness may look different for everyone, it is something that everyone is striving for.