Walter Benn Michaels has a large amount of knowledge in diversity, he has written many articles on the topic. Michaels has expressed his knowledge and beliefs that there is a great deal of diversity among human beings. Unfortunately, diversity has been defined by the average Americans as racism verses economic stability. In the article, “The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality,” Walter Benn Michaels’ skillful presentation of his logos overshadows his less successful portrayal of pathos and ethos concerning the idea of love for identity. However, Michaels has impeccable logos in the article with his references on the idea of love for identity, but does not express his ethos and pathos as fluent. On the other hand, his ethos and pathos are not as strong as his logos, he still shows a great deal of ethos in the article.
As mentioned previously, in “The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality,” Michaels shows an exceptional amount of logos, which can also be viewed as data or evidence on the corresponding topic. In the article, Michaels uses
…show more content…
Another example of his logos appeal would be when Michaels describes how Jimmy Gatz is a poor boy no one cares about, but Jay Gatsby is somebody of importance in The Great Gatsby. However, Jimmy Gatz was a poor boy that became rich and changed his name to Jay Gatsby to be someone important. Michaels continues to describe that even though Gatsby and Gatz were the same person, he is still viewed as a different kind of race (Michaels 810). Michaels used The Great Gatsby to inform the reader that even though Gatsby was rich, he was still diversely a race. Michaels expresses how no one typically cares about someone’s economic standpoint, but more about racial
This essay will first explore how the ethos is weak, then discuss how the pathos is also weak, then how the logos is strong, and finally how the fallacies undermine the effectiveness of the argument. The author’s purpose, which is to evaluate the strength and weakness on the appeals to ethos, pathos and logos, is effectively accomplished by the end of the article. While James J. Farrell is effective in his appeals to logos, he is not as successful in his appeal to pathos and ethos because he commits some emotional fallacies. First, James J. Farrell is effective in his appeal to logos by providing factual data and definitions.
Moreover, according to Cohen, society is basically a “pyramid structure…so 90 percent of the world's population is (a) potential ally, (and) therefore it’s very important to think in a coalitional way and look at how these things intersect” (5). It is also essential to recognize that “social identities are not fixed” and that science’s “reliance on the null hypothesis” can be misleading (8,9). Thus, the author urges psychologists and sociologists to “develop a more sophisticated and interdisciplinary understanding of historical and sociological aspects of the social construction of race, gender, class and other categories of identity, difference and disadvantage” (10). By employing this intersectional methodolgy, society will be able to broaden these coalitions and begin to address the most marginalized of
First the reader can notice that all of Tatum’s data and information is arranged in sections with headings that label what she will addressing. Subtitle “Understanding Racial Identity Development” (p9) heads her section all about how kids see their race in everyday life and how it transitions throughout their life. However, the organization itself is not an example of logos the titles are. The titles support her claim by labeling all the problems she addresses. By doing this she puts all the topics on the table and lets the reader know what she will use next to support her thesis.
Ronald Takaki a renowned pioneer in the field of ethnic studies has over the years authored numerous books on diversity in American society. As a grandson of Japanese immigrants who became the first black studies professor at UCLA, Takaki for many years has continually tried to bridge cultures and ethnic groups in the United States. In his book “A different mirror: A history of multicultural America”, Takaki addresses the idea of multiculturalism in our society, and also talks about how for many years we have been told to acknowledge the notions that the core principles of our nation uprooted only from one group rather than a contribution from other various cultures as well. The ‘master narrative’ posed by Takaki describes the growing
I highly value culture and diversity in our society because it is a huge part of every American’s life, especially mine. I grew up as a Hmong American who was split in-between two distinct cultures, and I struggled of managing through two different cultures and their culture values. I developed many different perspectives on various topics and with the further exposure to health and higher education, I began to appreciate diversity, especially within my Hmong population. I realized the intersectionality of identities and the socioecological concerns a Hmong person may come across as they progress through life.
How could diversity in the United States potentially lead to collapse? There are many elements that contribute to collapse. Whether it’s on a larger scale, like a country, or on a smaller scale, like a family. There is an infinite amount. But the most important one, is diversity.
In her book, The Giver, Lowry demonstrates that though diversity can bring chaos, it makes the world a more creative and beautiful place. By following Jonas’s character the reader comes to realize the importance of diversity to humanity. It is critical that citizens celebrate their differences rather than being ashamed of
Having food on the table, a roof over your head, and a job to make ends meet. It is a basic human right. We live in a global era where all people need one another to survive and succeed. Immigrants bring diversity to the United States, along with their cultures, and skills, which help make us stronger as a nation. Without diversity in our society, we would be self-centered, which means we need immigrants.
Additionally, the author could better improve this article by appealing to ethos. He already has appealed to logos and pathos, and it would only make his argument stronger by appealing to
“Racial formation” is an ideology made for the construction of social structure of different races. Omi and Winant convey excellent cases of how “racial formation” affects our everyday lives. They examine how it has caused “America’s unsolved racial dilemma” (Omi and Winant,19).
Later, the cultural critic Stuart Hall has opined about the changing nature of identity. He says that there is no fixed identity that can be attributed to an individual for his life period; it evolves through several changes in each phase of life. So it can be understood that formation of identity involves several steps: construction, reconstruction and deconstruction. The politics behind this formation may depend on the nature of identity that an individual tries to hold. Indeed, the cultural critic Kobena Mercer reminds us: “One thing at least is clear - identity only becomes an issue when it is in crisis, when something
Identity is one thing that no one can experience, which comes to the conclusion that no individual has an identity. The community lacks individuality which there is no social stability without individual stability in the Brave New World. Community, being one of the 3 ideals in the Brave New World is shown through their placement within their social groups, Ford’s day celebrations, community sings and solidarity services. Although great lengths are taken to create a community in this dystopian society there still lacks the actual sense of a community, their emotions are limited, they are taught to fear as others and have the same likes and dislikes. In this society, their social groups In the novel, an individual's identity is known as a fundamental of society.
In the article ‘The Complexity of Identity - Who am I?’ , the author Beverly Tatum argues that the definition of identity for a person is laid down by the societal norms and not by one’s own conscious understanding of her or his existence. And these societal norms are the ones that are acceptable to the dominant group of the society. Any aspect of one’s identity that sets her or him apart from others is targeted by the dominants. Tatum has used the terms ‘dominants’ and ‘subordinates’.
While identity focuses on uniqueness such as how an individual is different from and similar to others, diversity focuses on the range of the difference and uniqueness such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political beliefs, among others. Diversity should be seen as source of strength. However, it can also be a source of violence, oftentimes by those who fear or dislike difference. In the best light diversity is foundation for peacebuilding – since it enables us to draw strength and be respectful of difference. Identity and diversity are linked.
It focuses on the fact that identity is not stable rather it is in flux and fluidity now (Pile and Thrift, 1995). They saw identity with cluster of difference and vibrancy, with fluidity and contrast. Difference plays a vital role in the fluidity of identity as Soja and Hooper say that the politics of identity include power, difference and change (1996:187). People have multiple identities and in the construction of identity there is a key factor called difference. This difference comes from different sides like place, origin, gender, culture and ethnicity.