Freakonomics was written to explain not only economics as the name suggests but also a slew of other topics and fields. Freakonomics discusses everything from the Ku Klux Klan to abortion, while managing to remain a single cohesive text. One thing that helps Freakonomics to remain a single piece of literature is the very distinct voice and writing style that Levitt and Dubner. The distinct writing style and voice also creates a tone that carries through the entire essay adding to the cohesion. Levitt and Dubner also make uses of several rhetorical techniques. The unique voice and writing style combined with the rhetorical techniques that are used makes it easy for one to make personal connections to Freakonomics. One of the most important …show more content…
The chapter also discussed how real estate agents use their knowledge to get you to do thing that are not in your best interest as well as how people lie to appear more attractive on dating website. The main theme of the chapter was the power of information and how certain people use knowledge to their advantage. The second chapter we read “Where Have All the Criminals Gone?” (Levitt, and Dubner 73). The chapter starts by talking about how the ban on abortions in Romania led to the downfall of the communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. The chapter then transitions away from abortions in Romania to the drop in crime rates in American cities before explain how abortions effect the crime rate due to the fact that they limit the part of the population that has the greatest chance of becoming criminals. The tone of these chapters were serious and …show more content…
It appeals to logic when it is explaining how certain factors led to a drop in the crime rates of American cities. It is appealing to logic because it lays out how things happen and then cause other things to happen. “The evidence linking increased punishment with lower crime rates is very strong. Harsh prison terms have been shown to act as both deterrent (for the would-be criminal on the street) and prophylactic (for the would-be criminal who is already locked up),” (Levitt, and Dubner 77). This is an appeal to logic because it uses logic to present the argument in a concise manner. Freakonomics uses an appeal to credibility when it cites its source. It uses sources such as the Tuskegee Institute and people that are considered experts in their fields. “If you both own a gun and have a swimming pool in the backyard, the swimming pool is about 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is.” (Levitt, and Dubner 91) this is an appeal to emotion because it gets people to think about how things are not always as they seem by using the death of their
Minimum wage has always been a difficult topic to talk about in political situations with questions about increasing or decreasing it forever on the ballot. In today’s economic state there has been an increase of the minimum wage in several states such as California; which has caused a debate on the national level of how much the lower class can live on. In Barbara Ehrenreich’s book she tries out low wage living and documents it in Nickel and Dimed, in her opinion it's barely possible to survive on low wages for even one person. To show this she employs conversational and concrete diction to show the difficulties of living two lives that are at different poles of the economic scale and the ignorance of both classes to those besides themselves with a confusion of audiences.
“Time Ain’t Money” written by Douglas Rushkoff, was first published in the website Changethis.com in the year 2013. The purpose of Changethis.com is to help writers spread their ideas in the form of manifestos. In the beginning of “Time Ain’t Money” it is clear that Rushkoff is writing a manifesto because he is letting the audience know what his policies, aims and goals are. Rushkoff uses the writing strategy of logos throughout the essay to inform and encourage the business world in particular that times are changing from the industrial to digital age and presentism. “Time Ain’t Money” is mostly about the idea that time isn’t money anymore.
Freakonomics is somewhat random grab bag of topics. The unifying theme of this book for me was finding ways to ask questions so that one's available statistics and data can provide an answer, time after time they used available statistics to provide some time of reasoning or answers to the question being asked. Some of these efforts were more successful than others. Some of the questions Levitt and Dubner study felt unnecessary, that no one really cares about. But there are also some good subjects.
(Levitt and Dubner 19). The casual, informative tone achieves the purpose by keeping the reader interested. A book written with exactly the same information and conclusions as Freakonomics, but written with a formal tone instead of an informal, conversational tone would be much less
No Nickels or Dimes To Spare In the book, Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich writes the story, “Serving in Florida.” She describes her experience living as an undercover waitress when in reality she’s a journalist for culture and politics with a doctorate in biology. Ehrenreich experiences trying to survive on multiple low income jobs to understand what it is like to be in their shoes instead of being apart of the higher middle class.
Professor and philosopher, Jason Zinser, in “The Good, the Bad and The Daily Show” addresses the topic of “fake” news, and tries to decide if shows such as The Daily Show are good resources for people to use. Are these shows a suitable replacement for "real" news? In the article he states that “fake” news shows have their “virtues and vices”. At the end of the article, Zinser believes that as a whole the shows helps the viewers learn about current events. Zinser uses ethical appeal, logical appeal, and emotional appeal to help get his point across to the readers.
According to Aristotle triangle, he advocates for the ability to persuade the audience and speaker with employing pathos, ethos, and logos. The ethical appeals are the ethos; emotional appeal is pathos, while the logical appeals are logos. Abortion is a hotly debated issue across the world. In the USA, the current political climate alongside the economic recession is affecting factors precipitating abortion, and this is warranting investigation on the reasons for the same (Lawrence, et al. 2005). The abortion in America is a big issue, and therefore the paper examines the ethical, moral and logical arguments behind seeking, statistics, and justifying the acts.
Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.
My definition of rhetoric before the readings was simply: successful written or oral communication with a clear purpose & audience in mind. After completing the readings, I have decided that is not specific enough and does not encompass what rhetoric really is. The readings by Crusus, Channell, and Drucker helped establish a clear relationship between argument, “mature reasoning”, and communication as a mode used to communicate. Both of the readings provided a clearer understanding of argument and communication, key components to rhetoric, but did not change my definition until I read “The Rhetorical Situation” by Bitzer. The idea of a rhetorical situation, provided a clear application of the question: “What is rhetoric?”
William Hazlitt composed his passaged, “On the Want of Money” to express that “one cannot get on well in the world without money”. Although many believe money is not necessary to be happy Hazlitt provides his audience with a substantial argument that money is needed to live happily. Within Hazlitt’s sharp excerpt, he uses several different rhetorical strategies to strengthen his argument and express his views on the importance of money. Money in fact, is very important to each person since in today’s world, money is used for everything. The problem is occurring is it is almost impossible to not desire or need money in our society.
In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, he states that the decline of interest in literature—especially from young teens—will have a negative outcome in society. Notably, he informs the readers by utilizing strong vocabulary, as well as rhetorical appeals to persuade his audience that the decline in reading will have a negative outcome. This allows readers to comprehend his views and join his side of the argument. Gioia’s word choice assists in showing the magnitude of the text by stressing the meaning and importance of his argument.
It has been shown that using certain appeals in writings, especially on subjects that already give an especially large emotional reaction, makes opinions sound reasonable and sensible. For example, on a subject such as amnesty for illegal immigrants, it is easy to see the emotional appeal that one could use to weave a sneaky opinion into their article. In the article “Amnesty? Let Us Be Vigilant and Charitable”, John Kavanaugh, who created the article in 2008, decides to use a large amount of emotional appeal in his article on the subject of Amnesty. In contrast, the article “Dream On”, by Mark Krikorian, written in 2010 arguably does the exact opposite of emotional appeal, logical appeal. It is clear of his word choice that he is opposed to bad amnesty laws in general.
Thesis Statement: Abortion has been a major topic throughout the years, there has been much debate between pro-choice and pro-life but if people can come together to reach comprises it could help society make positive progress. There are many different views and opinions on abortion in today’s world. Some would say that abortion is wrong and others would say it is right; and some would say it is wrong or right depending on the circumstances. This is when complications surface and people began to look at all aspects of the situation. Abortion has always been a controversial social issue but not as potent as the year 2016 and 2017.
Broken into two sections, the book’s first is of a theoretical approach and
“Abortion -should it be a right of every woman in the present context- A critical analysis” 1. Introduction I elected to present my dissertation on a topic based on ‘abortion’ since it is a hidden social menace in our society. It is like an iceberg. The tip represents the reported abortions, which everyone sees.