General Robert E. Lee, the General-in-Chief of the Confederate army was one of the greatest generals in history because he was an expert in traditional warfare, showed innovation and tact on the battlefield, and remained an honorable man. Through protecting his troops, using successful military tactics and his desire to communicate with his commanders, Lee outshined all opposing generals. Lee brought new views and tactics into the militay world. Although success was not always the outcome, Lee was an expert at understanding the abilities of his own force. Robert E. Lee demonstrated many traits and actions of a successful american general through his strategies, expertise and ideals. Robert E. Lee was an expert in warfare,especially when it came down to understanding the power of his own army. Lee was able to realize the stregths of his team as wells as the weaknesses of the opposing armies. He knew how to use both the weaknesses and stengths to help his …show more content…
Grant. Although the tactics were unlike what anybody had ever heard of he used them successfully because he was a genius, not just with the military but also when dealing with his troops. For example, Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863, he split his army and won a victory, which ended up paving the way for his second invasion of the North. In this battle He sent Jackson’s corps (which included all the army but two parts) to destroy the Federals’ right flank and won the battle while outnumbered two to one by the Union army. Another example of Lee’s boldness was with his traditional extended flank tactic, but he also cleverly made his line easy to reinforce at any point by building a long, well-sized road running closely behind his lines. Lee brought something new into the military world. He had very differnt and unique views on his military and tactics as opposed to other generals of his time and/pervios american
With the Mississippi River heavily fortified, Grant sidestepped the Rebels by travelling up the Tennessee and Cumberland River, capturing Fort Henry and Fort Donelson, the first major Union victory.” He was one of the many leaders from the North. For the south their general was Robert E. Lee, he was an American and a south side soldier; he was also a general in the south. He had many battles and was considered the most successful and victorious general. He controlled and ordered the Army of Northern Virginia during the Civil War from 1862; until his later surrender in 1865 to the north Americans.
Robert E Lee was a famous war general born to Revolutionary War hero Henry “Light-Horse Harry” Lee (www.civilwar.org).For 17 years, instead of serving in the military, Robert E Lee served as an officer in the Corps of Engineers. It was not until the 1846 war with Mexico that Robert E lee started to get involved with military duties. When Robert E Lee was a member of general Winfield Scott’s staff, Robert E Lee earned 3 brevets for gallantry and earned the rank of colonel.
“The Most Skillful Military Tactician” Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson was one of the most ambitious and loyal leaders in the American Civil War. Many Historians admire the leadership he lead to the confederates. At the time during the American Civil War people in the Union even admired his leadership skills. Thomas lead many successful military tacticians throughout the battles he lead with most of them leading to confederate victories.
While Lee was preparing for the Battle of Antietam, a copy of his plan was discovered by Union commander, Major General George B. McClellan. Since his plan was discovered, he was attacked head-on and had to flee while suffering around ten thousand casualties (“Battle of Antietam.”). During this battle, fourteen thousand of his men were killed when trying to cross the Potomac River (“Robert E. Lee Biography.”). In the Battle of Chancellorsville, he faced an army two times bigger, so he split his army in two for the element of surprise (“Battle of Chancellorsville”). Yes, he might have made an excellent move, but he also lost one of his corps commanders, “Stonewall” Jackson (“Robert E. Lee” History Learning).
General Robert E. Lee built a relationship with his generals through trust as Commander in chief. By allowing the generals to conduct missions on his behalf without giving them orders. This allowed General Lee and his army to be felixable during the war. General Lee divided his army in to four divisions and expanded them out thourgh the battlefield. The plan was to have the bulk of his army to cross Chickahominy and attack the Union north position.
When looking back onto the great history of American leaders and generals, many names notably stand out. These American heroes helped to shape the future of our country, from the efforts of General Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Second World War, to General Douglas Macarthur of the Korean War, to even George Washington in the Revolutionary War. Regardless, each of these brave leaders allowed for their respective forces to attain victory, yet in this caveat, the legacy of many brilliant and skillful generals is lost. Victory does not determine skill, and such a notion has never attested to a military leader as much as it applies to General Robert E. Lee, of the Confederate Forces in the American Civil War. Lee’s proficiency in battle tactics and
Generals In the near end of 1862 General Braxton Bragg was a troubled man due to the fact that he lost the respect of his troops. His lieutenants didn’t respect him anymore then his troops did. While on union’s army General William Rosecrans had great ideas and strategic ability. In fact the reason why the battle of Stones River was considered a union victory was because of General Rosecrans strategy (Cozzens, 1990).
Lee was all about tradition and Grant was always looking towards the future. Both fought in the Mexican War, they commanded the entire armies of both sides. Though the achievements of Grant and Lee were alike in their early lives, the differing results at the pinnacle of their careers changed the entire direction of a nation. Lee did not like the idea of the South seceding from the Union , though he knew he could not fight against his home state, Virginia. President Lincoln offered him the job of Commanding General of the Union Army.
Victories were only won by Lee’s aggressiveness on and off of the battlefield. Lee endured the bloodiest days of the war and still kept urging his army on even until the very end. Even after the Battle Robert at Gettysburg, which almost completely destroyed his army, he pushed forward. After fighting a battle he made this remark to General James Longstreet, “It is well war is so terrible-we would grow too fond of it” (Robert E. Lee www.history.com). By 1865 the fate of the war was clear.
Grant, as he commanded the Union’s army to its victory during the war. His prime “opponent” during the war was Robert E. Lee, the most iconic and possibly the most respected Southern war commander. It’s ironic in that Lee had much more military experience than Grant did, but it’s clear from the actions the two took that Grant was a superior commander. While Lee did defeat armies in Virginia, he failed to successfully invade Northern soil twice. Grant refused to withdraw in battles, regardless of the setbacks and casualties, and because his troops outnumbers Lee’s, they were gradually reduced in number.
This battle ended a huge amount of soldiers’ lives within twelve hours of fighting. The Battle of Antietam was the bloodiest day in Civil War history. but it was a pivotal battle during the war. The Battle of Gettysburg took place on July first and ended on July third. General Robert E. Lee’s biggest mistake took a huge turn in the war.
Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
Lee was so fearless he determined to invade the North reiteratively. Robert E. Lee strategy was to drift the fighting away from Virginia and into the Union Territory. He wanted to move the fighting, because the Confederate were under siege in Virginia. Lee hoped to gain recognition from Britain and France for the Confederacy. Joesph Hooker,the Union commander, was exposed to the worst defeat of the Army of Potomac in the Battle of Chancellorsville.
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
General Lee chose to surrender to General Grant. Even though he surrendered, he was still a great general and leader. After all, both General Grant and General Lee were very good examples of what it meant to be superior leaders. They both fought hard, and led very appropriately. Both men symbolized characteristics of what it meant to be a good human leader.