Roe Vs Wade Essay

The court case of Roe v. Wade, which established a woman's right to access abortion, has been a highly alienating issue in the United States since its decision in 1973. Supporters argue that access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental right of women to control and make decisions about their reproductive health. While opposers argue that abortion is morally unethical and that the government should limit or completely ban it. This political disagreement showed itself in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision, in which the court ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade. Similarly, how the original ruling of Roe v. Wade changed the nation's future during its decision in 1973, the overruling will change the nation's future once again.

Six of the nine justices are conservative, making the Supreme Court a conservative majority. Historically, this is the first term with a six-justice conservative majority (Senate RPC). This significant difference in political identification within the Supreme Court hinders proper decision-making on court cases because politically biased justices make the Supreme Court of the United States partisan. Justices are thought to be insulated from political pressure when deciding cases (The White House). Justices should interpret the law based on legal precedent and the Constitution rather than personal political biases. When justices make decisions based on their political affiliations or ideologies, it can call into question the impartiality and fairness of the Supreme Court. Politically biased decisions can have significant consequences, as the Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the law and ensuring justice for all Americans. A national survey conducted by Pew Research asked American citizens if the justices should bring or not bring their political views into their decisions, in which 84% of American citizens responded that the justices should not bring their political views into decision making (Pew Research). Suppose the Supreme Court continues to remain politically biased as a conservative majority. In that case, it can lead to a loss of trust in the institution and its

Wade, many Americans are losing trust in the Supreme Court and want to limit the power of the Supreme Court to tackle the Supreme Court's crisis of legitimacy. However, limiting the power of the Supreme Court of the United States is not an effective solution to solve the issues of political bias among the justices. The power of the Supreme Court is derived from the Constitution with enumerated powers, which grants authority to interpret the law and serve as a check to the other branches of government (The White House). Attempting to limit the Court's power would require a constitutional amendment like with other branches of government, which is a complicated and lengthy process that requires a proposition of two-thirds majority vote of the House of Representatives and must be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures. Instead of limiting the power of the Supreme Court, it would be more effective to focus on improving the process of nominating and confirming justices. Ensuring that nominees have a background of true impartiality and commitment to interpreting the law based on legal and constitutional precedent can help to reduce political biases on the Supreme Court. Additionally, increasing transparency in the Court's decision-making process can help to maintain the public's trust in the institution because 53% of Americans already have little or no trust in the United States Supreme Court to operate in the best interest of