ipl-logo

Sacrifice Due To The Dred Scott Case

451 Words2 Pages

¨A man is a man, until that man finds a plan, a plan that makes a plan, a new man.¨ said by Dred Scott. Dred Scott had said this because he was of course a man, he had a plan which was to become free, and that plan would have changed so much back then, and that plan would have made him a new man, he would have been a free, new man. Dred Scott as a baby was born into slavery and never had a chance to have freedom. Dred Scott had died nine months after losing his case fighting for him freedom. Dred Scott created social change by fighting for his freedom, creating tension nationally, and the considering “Dred Scott Decision” the worst decision rendered by the Supreme Court.

Dred Scott Case was a decision/case that fought for his freedom. Dred Scott was born into slavery, so he didn’t really have a chance to live free. Dred Scott had two different masters, Peter Blow then John Emerson. After the death of his first master, Peter Blow, Dred Scott tried to gain his freedom from a doctor but had gotten turned down because he has African Blood line and then was sold to to his other master, John Emerson. Because he was turned down he had decided to take his case to the Supreme Court. The Dred Scott decision was the culmination of the case of …show more content…

Dred Scott’s case had also intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred had been “left” by his master for a long time with no word from his master. Dred Scott has decided to challenge for his freedom because he had built a “new life” and his master suddenly one day decided to call him back to him after not hearing from him for months. The court had ruled that African Americans were not citizens, but rather property, and could not sue in

Show More
Related

  • Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

    385 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case of Scott vs. Sandford was a major factor in the movement for abolitionist. It empowered the newly republican party, and altered the constitution for the good. Till this day, U.S. colored citizens are now treated like citizens due to the Scott vs. Sandford case. Dred Scott, a slave who was purchased by a U.S surgeon -Dr. John Emerson- who worked for the army, moved together in the Wisconsin territory which was in the northern area.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dred Scott was taken back into slavery and accused Sandford because Scott was in a free states and claimed that he was in the free state long enough to be a free slave. The Supreme court ruled against Dred Scott, this decision affected blacks preventing them to become citizens and an giving them the right to appeal to a jury and making it harder for a slave to escape because the free states didn’t make a runaway slave a free slave. The case also affected popular sovereignty. Where states got to choose if they were to be a free states or a slave

    Read More

  • How Did The Compromise Of 1850 Play In The Start Of The Civil War

    962 Words  | 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a Virginia slave who tried to sue for his freedom in court. The case eventually rose to the level of the Supreme Court, where the justices found that, as a slave, Dred Scott was a piece of property that had none of the legal rights or recognitions afforded to a human being. The Dred Scott Decision was an event that happened that effected the start of the Civil War. It threatened to entirely recast the political landscape that had thus far managed to prevent civil war. The classification of slaves as mere property made the federal government’s authority to regulate the institution much more

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Dred Scott Case

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sanford was the man who had procured him from Mrs. Emerson, after Dr. Emerson died. Dred Scott wouldn’t give up because freedom was all that matter to him. The case known as, Dred Scott vs Sanford, began and Scott still held the same position. He argued that he was absolutely a free man because of his late owner, who had taken him to the free states. But once again, the courts determined that Dred Scott wouldn’t be granted his freedom.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ferguson And Dred Scott

    1873 Words  | 8 Pages

    In the Dred Scott vs Sandford Court Case, the US supreme court proved this by declaring that black slaves were just considered property and could not sue in court. Dred Scott, an african slave, came with his owner to the Northwest Ordinance during the mid eighteenth century and lived there for two years. However, Congress previously declared that slavery was outlawed within that territory within the Missouri Compromise, as it stated any states above the 36 parallel were free states. As a result Dred Scott believed that he should have been freed and sued his owner till it got to the Supreme Court, where he was declared as just property, not as United States citizen, therefore not allowed to sue in court. “Dred Scott was a negro slave, the lawful property of the defendant; and as to the issue thirdly above joined, we, the jury, find that wife of said Dred Scott, and Eliza and Lizzie, the daughters of the said Dred Scott, were negro slaves, the lawful property of the defendant."

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Sandford's Case In The History Of The Supreme Court

    1559 Words  | 7 Pages

    Dred Scott v. Sandford is one of the darkest cases in the history of the Supreme Court. After years of slavery, parts of the United States were beginning to head in a direction away from slavery. The establishment of the Missouri Compromise and gaining some territories as slave states and others as free states, was proof of this shift from slavery, especially in the north (Pearson Education Inc. 2005). The Scott v. Sandford decision, in which an African American man was denied both his freedom and his citizenship to the United States, did not link up with this new way of thinking.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott: Return To Slavery

    73 Words  | 1 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri, but from 1833-1843, he lived in places where slavery was illegal. When Scott returned to Missouri, he believed that because he lived in free territory, he was a free man. He sued without success in Missouri courts. Scott’s master said that Dred Scott couldn’t be a citizen because of Article III of the Constitution. In the end, Dred Scott lost and had to return to slavery.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Dred Scott V. Sanford Case

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    Scott without a doubt was not giving up his fight for freedom this easily because his case could also help other African American slaves stand up for themselves. Sandford was so angry with the fact that Scott won the second trial, Mrs. Emerson, Sanford’s sister took it upon herself to appeal the ruling which then went to the Missouri Supreme Court where Scott had lost in court again (William, 2014). Scott shows that the case was not about money but simply because he had been held illegally by Sanford which is why he sued to make Sanford pay for lost time over the years that he could never get back. In fact, this case was so powerful many believed that it was the cause which leads the Civil War to occur (150 Years Ago, 2007). With the help of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendment the Dred Scott decision was overturned, which now allows American citizens in the United States to sue in federal court (PBS,

    Read More

  • Dred Scott's Case

    353 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine you were a man who wanted to be free, to be with your family for the rest of your life. This is not such a hard thing to imagine today. But now imagine you were a black man that was born in 1799 in the state of Virginia. There is a man by the name of Dred Scott who wished for him and his family to be free. Little did he know his case would be a milestone in American history, and a large reason why our country went into a civil war under President Abraham Lincoln.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Dred Scott Decision Important To American History

    542 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Dred Scott Decision was important since it changed the way African-Americans were viewed, and caused the Civil War since it caused Southern states to expand slavery. The Dred Scott Decision was significant to American history. The Dred Scott Decision was a crucial event for the entire United States. This significant choice started in 1846, and came to a close in 1857.

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    1299 Words  | 6 Pages

    In addition, this decision revealed that African-Americans were considered to be property rather than citizens. In sum, Dred Scott, a slave of Dr. John Emerson of Illinois, a state in which slavery is prohibited, sued his master’s widow for not granting him his freedom in a free state. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to his freedom and must remain a slave. Lincoln described the Dred Scott Decision as a “burlesque upon judicial decisions”. Significantly, this decision displays the false interpretation of the Declaration of Independence(DOI) and the clear opposition Congress has to the idea that equality also applied to blacks.

    Read More

  • The Expansion Of Slavery And The Civil War

    94 Words  | 1 Pages

    The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Essay

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

    Read More

  • Cause Of The Civil War Essay

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave who attempted to gain his freedom. Scott was owned by a man for the early part of his life, and then was sold to a new man once his original owner died (Tindall 672). He followed his new owner around the country, and lived in several free states (Tindall 672). Once his second owner died, Scott filed for his freedom (Tindall 672). After going through a rigorous process, the court finally decided that Scott had no grounds for his case because he was not actually a citizen (Tindall 672).

    Read More

More about Sacrifice Due To The Dred Scott Case

Open Document