Scopes Trial Dbq

599 Words3 Pages

Urban vs Rural Scopes Trial

The 1920’s can be characterized as a clash between the traditional and the modern. One of the biggest moments where urban vs rural was tested was in the scopes trial or “monkey trial”. The scopes trial involved a substitute teacher, John Scopes, who was accused of violating the Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach evolution in any state-funded school in Tennessee. This is where urban vs rural had huge conflict, this teacher who was considered modern for teaching his theory of humanity to a traditionalist school. John Scopes attorney said, “For God’s sake let the children have their minds kept open.” (Doc B) referencing that modern thinking was not always a bad thing, “that having kids taught all the facts and theories that observation that learning had produced.” (Doc B) …show more content…

Modern thinking was denied and when John Scopes brought up evolution no matter what his case was he had no chance, yet many places heard about the trial and tried to help by, one releasing an article exposing the true evil behind having church and school strangely mixed. In the article it says, “Religion and business had become strangely mixed.” (Doc D) New York Times, expressed that when rural school are blindly teaching kids one path then there will be no diversity in

Open Document