ipl-logo

Sectional Tension Dbq Essay

730 Words3 Pages

By the mid-nineteenth century, the Constitution had been put into the fiery crucible that was the issue of slavery, littering the antebellum era with political controversy. The national structure framed by the Founding Fathers in 1787, initially intended to bring unity, was now the primary grounds from which the question of slavery was bringing sectional conflict and national disharmony as a result of mass-moral compromise. The Constitution of the United States was instituted to encourage the unification of the stark sectional divide within the nation. However, rather than achieve its purpose, the Constitution was contorted and employed by both sections to further their envisioned future of the country. Secessionists claimed, as verbalized …show more content…

As a result of the Compromise of 1850, which defused the quarrel between the free Northern States and the slave Southern States, the territories acquired during the Mexican-American War were determined to be free, slave, or dependent upon the principle of popular sovereignty. California was admitted as a free state, the Utah and New Mexico territories were to be determined by popular sovereignty, the Texas-New Mexico boundary was solidified, and slave trade was terminated in Washington, D.C., making it easier for the South to recover fugitive slaves (Document A). As stated by an Anonymous Georgian in “Plain Words for the North,” everything the South could ask for was embodied in the Constitution, but two provisions were necessary to the South’s success – “the recognition of slavery where the people choose it and the remedy for fugitive slaves” (Document B). The North saw popular sovereignty and the remedy of fugitive slaves as deceptive encouragement of immoral and unconstitutional activity (Document C). But, southerners viewed the North’s assumption of ownership to be unconstitutional. In many ways, and especially from the eyes of a Northerner, the largely Southern Democratic Platform forced slavery into society, particularly demanding its acceptance from the Free-Soil party with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This inevitably stirred sectional discord and fanned the flame of the rising Secessionist

Show More
Related

Northerners Attitudes Toward The South In Lydia Maria Child's

269 Words | 2 Pages

With the pressure following the passage of the Kansas Nebraska Act, many northerners opposed slavery and were concerned with the possibility of its expansion. In 1856, these northerners formed a new political party called the Republican Party. Once Abraham Lincoln was nominated as the Republican candidate, the South began making plans to secede from the union if Lincoln was elected as President of the United States. In the “South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession”, delegates state, “A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. ”15

Read More

How Did The Compromise Of The Nashville Convention-1850

941 Words | 4 Pages

Compromise of 1850 - 1850 The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, declared the remaining territory from the Mexican cession to be voted slave or free through popular sovereignty, abolished slave trade in the District of Columbia, and created the Fugitive Slave Act. The south felt cheated by the compromise as the

Read More

A Significant Turning Point In The Mexican-American War

320 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction Thesis- The Mexican-American War marked a significant turning point in the debate over slavery by increasing territorial tensions, boosting political issues, and developing multiple social and spiritual movements. Paragraph One- Territorial Tensions Annexation of Mexico Territories Gold in California- More tensions over California becoming free or slave Missouri Compromise- laid out which states would be slave/free states Overruled later on Texas, was it free or was it mexico?- Debates over whether or not Texas would remain free or become slave state

Read More

James K. Polk Dbq Essay

1488 Words | 6 Pages

James K. Polk, along with his Democrat counterparts, initiated an expansionist campaign that promised he would acquire Texas, Oregon, California, and New Mexico if he won the presidential Election of 1844. Similar to other Americans, Polk had been inspired and influenced by the Manifest Destiny of 1839 that described the United States to have a divine fate in westward expansion in order to spread ideas of democracy. Following the conclusion of the election and Polk’s inauguration, Texas entered the Union and the Oregon territory was claimed. However, Polk’s rapacity continued and led him to fight for every parallel of territory in order to continue the practice of ‘manifest destiny.’ The annexation of Texas and its unofficially declared boundaries

Read More

Senator Stephen Douglas Argumentative Essay

454 Words | 2 Pages

Even those who benefited from Southern slavery, such as textile manufacturers, did not wish to see slavery expand further west or north. The Kansas-Nebraska Act succeeded only in shifting Northern public opinion even further away from reconciliation with the South. The Kansas-Nebraska Act also caused the collapse of both the Whig and Democratic parties. The parties split according to section: to pass the act through Congress, Southern Whigs voted with Southern Democrats against their Northern counterparts for the first time in history.

Read More

Did The Constitution Lead To The Failure Of The Union Dbq

796 Words | 4 Pages

It is true to say that by the 1850’s the Constitution went from an instrument of unity to a source of tension, and lead to the failure of the union. The Constitution originally helped maintain peace, but when issues over slavery appeared, it failed to provide the guidance the union needed. Because of differing interpretations of the Constitution and the multiple conflicts, it lead to disunion. Because not everyone could agree on what the constitution implied, it led to the failure of the union. Document E states: “The words ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore that it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply..

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

1769 Words | 8 Pages

It was called the Compromise of 1850. Later on the Fugitive Slave Act 1850 was updated and it stopped the slave trade in Washington. This led to the popular sovereignty belief, which was that the people believed that the people they voted for run the government. Kansas and Nebraska were given the choice to have slavery or not. This was known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

612 Words | 3 Pages

Many other states followed forming the Confederacy. Document Seven describes a message to Congress by Lincoln. He states that the southern states have created a clever deception, that states could peacefully withdraw from the Union without their consent. He goes on to say that many of the states succeeding have never been a state outside of the Union. Thus by them asserting a claim of state rights, without never being a state outside the Union is blasphemy and is just another attempt to destroy the Union.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Senator Daniel Webster

448 Words | 2 Pages

In his fiery speech to the Senate, given on March 7, 1850, shortly after the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Senator Daniel Webster expresses his views of secession to Abraham Lincoln, presenting the Compromise of 1850 as a Union-saving measure. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, but also enforced a stringent Fugitive Slave Act, which forced runaway slaves to be returned to their masters. Webster’s powerful speech outlines his feelings towards the South and secession, clearly showing that the speaker believed in a united, but also in a way divided, nation. Daniel Websterwas originally a lawyer and later served as a Massachusetts congressman and senator. As a congressman, he strongly opposed the War of 1812, the annexation of Texas, and going to war with Mexico.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Political Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1180 Words | 5 Pages

He hoped that this compromise would “settle all questions in controversy between the free and slave states.” In order to please both the North and the South, the compromise stated that California was to be accepted into the Union as a free state, and proposed a new, more efficient and useful fugitive slave law. Additionally, terms of the compromise included the abolition of slave trade, but not slavery itself; Texas-Mexico boundary dispute resolved, and Texas paid ten million dollars by the federal government; and the citizen’s right in New Mexico and Utah of popular sovereignty. To convince the two side to accept his plan, Clay had them consider the alternative to accepting: disunion and possibly war. While the compromise did pass, Northern opposition to the Fugitive Slave Act quickly intensified as mobs formed to prevent enforcement of the act, and several other northern states passed their own laws barring the deportation of fugitive slaves, such as the Personal Liberty

Read More

Political Compromise Between 1820 And 1860 Essay

713 Words | 3 Pages

As young nations slowly progress to their full potential, many obstacles riddle their ways. For the United States, the Constitution was the word of law, written by demigods who could possibly do no wrong. Until of course, the question of archaic versus modern morality rises. Such was the problem in between the troubled years of 1820 and 1860. Rapid polarization on the institution of slavery between the North and the South, as well as the magnitude of importance of the ideologies of secession and slavery led to political compromise being increasingly difficult.

Read More

Henry Clay Compromise Of 1850

392 Words | 2 Pages

As the United states continued to grow in size by gaining territory from others such as Mexico who through the Treaty that ended the Mexican-American war, transferred California to the US. As American continued to grow the seemingly inevitable issue of slavery festered hostility/tensions between the North and the South as they actively continue to try and keep balance of the free to slave state ratio. In the end, the underlying issue became obvious on how the United States did not practice what they preached so vocally, and I reason this by stating America failed to govern according to its own famous principles. In efforts to do so Henry Clay proposed the Compromise of 1850 which stated four main points, 1) California would be recognized as

Read More

Reasons For The Downfall Of The Missouri Compromise Of 1850

797 Words | 4 Pages

As further compromises were needed to stabilize fragile relations, the expansion of territories revealed the gaping differences in American beliefs. To settle the complaints from southerners, Congress adopted the Compromise of 1850 to deal with both slavery and the expanding territories. Under this deal, California entered the United States as a free state and Washington D.C. abolished its slave trade. Also, other territories to the west could independently decide whether to ban or allow slavery. However, the law also caused controversy by allowing slave owners to capture fugitive slaves in the North.

Read More

The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

756 Words | 4 Pages

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

Read More

Slavery In The US Constitution

918 Words | 4 Pages

This new Constitution called for something in between the last two forms of government they had: they called for a strong central government that would last but wouldn 't endanger the citizen’s freedom or rights. This became known as the U.S. Constitution. In the end of the Constitutional Convention, each delegate left with a copy of the Constitution to convince the states to approve it. It got ratified in 1788. In the U.S. Constitution, there were several clauses that focused on slavery, such as ⅗ Compromise, slave trade clause, and the fugitive slave clause.

Read More

More about Sectional Tension Dbq Essay

Open Document