Shaya’s posit is interesting, particularly in relation to Vergil’s representation of Augustus. Vergil’s representation is not a perfect image of Augustus. In fact, Vergil often directly connects Augustus to the violence Augustus committed, or that ancestrally or historically has been committed. This particular monument to Augustus is not a polished and perfectly “good” version. Although the wording is beautiful, it is not what makes it so fascinating. It is, like Shaya says, the public's willingness to accept this monument. To see these violent connections, accept or acknowledge them, and still look at Augustus as someone who successfully re-created Rome. I think by not hiding these acts and the violence it creates a choice that the
Why is this monument, person, or event important? Why should it be remembered? Why is it significant? One reason is that monuments allow for people to feel
In the article Half-Measures Won’t Erase the Painful Past of Our Monuments, by Holland Cotter, cotter describes the connotations of historical monuments from the past and how it impacts the present by using rhetorical choices such as ethos, pathos, and a neutral tone, to relate to those who have been impacted by the history and to spread more awareness about their history. The government’s actions on whether the monuments convey a positive or negative messages, is not satisfying, which is related to the title “Half-Measures Won’t Erase the Painful Past of our Monuments”. Through the use of pathos, Cotter relates to readers who have been impacted by the people who are being celebrated by monuments, by referring to the messages monuments
Why would a 60ft monument want to glorify a slave owner? But by someone observing the monument they would not know that a slave owner is being glamorized.
Political figures in art has always been an important part of our history, culture and artistic representation, Roman and Byzantine art is a classic case of these representations. The Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius and Justinian as World Conqueror are two examples that demonstrate the power and prestige of these political authorities. First, Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius from the Roman, Italy (173-176 CE) measures 11’6” high, cast in bronze. Secondly, Justinian as World conqueror from Byzantium period measures 13” x 11” entire panel, center panel 7” x 5” and 1” deep. The creator of the equestrian statue is unknown, however, the creator of Justinian’s ivory relief was probably made by the imperial work of Constantinople.
The 8th grade class took a 4 day trip to Washington. We did many things to explore Washington D.C. including visiting monuments. Some people think differently of how a monument should be made. Good monuments to some people could be to make people remember about the person or thing being remembered or to just reflect the person’s life or importance. In “The Follower Problem” by David Brooks, David thinks a good monument should show power and authority.
He really cared about his He brought peace to the sea, Gaul, Spain and Germany. He gave out grains and money to men when taxes fell short. I don’t think this document is reliable as I may have been biased as he is writing about himself. Anybody would say nice things about themselves. D: Soldier Augustus is a good leader; he brought peace and treated everyone equally.
This showed the Roman people that Augustus was not about to enter them into a war for his own personal gains. It also allowed him to be seen as a peacemaker instead of a warmonger and that was vitally important to the Romans since they had suffered through civil war for the last seventy years. The people would remember Augustus as a man who protected their interests and looked out for them instead of just using them as fodder to attain more glory. This was precisely what Augustus wanted because the more people praised him for not chasing glory he actually gained more personal glory. Augustus found a way to mask his glory seeking behind other ideals and motivations and this is something that can be seen again several centuries later during the
According to Kirk Savage, monuments are “pure representations” (Source A, Savage) of a person, a movement, or an event that’s purpose is to create personal connections with viewers and/or to pay homage to whomever/whatever it is
In the southern part of the United States, national news is being made by the removal of the Confederate statues. Some communities believe these statues are representing “white supremacy” and they should be removed. Other places think that these monuments are history and it provides learning for a better future. Monuments were not established just for honoring slavery. Some heroes that are displayed achieved other feats than just being a Confederate.
Kirk Savage suggests in Source A (Savage), “The public monument speaks to a deep need for attachment that can be met only in a real place, where
For instance, Confederate monuments would allow generations to see that America isn’t “a place reserved for people who still want to spit our country, but rather a place for education that we can learn from the ugly protraction of our history” (Lanktree). Often, we talk about learning from the past so that the same mistakes won’t occur in the future. This specifically can be represented through these monuments; by having a symbol of the past where racism occurred, it serves as a reminder of what discrimination can do when one side is filled with bigotry. Having a place where one can learn about the effects of someone’s wrongdoings can allow today’s people to decide for themselves the future they want to create. Additionally, the author of the article Keep Confederate monuments, but put their horrific history on stage describes how Americans have been “willfully blind” about racial justice and that the statues could be used as reminders of the “catastrophic consequences” (Cose).
The Colosseum stands as a glorious but troubling monument to Roman Imperial power and cruelty. Inside it, for century’s people killed cold bloodedly as entertainment. It seems as if the buildings had gone from one type of extreme to the next. There was very much still a control of power but the values of each monument are different.
Some elements to recognize include the location, the size and design, and the meaning of the monument. First of all, the location of a monument is an extremely important factor when considering how to memorialize a person or experience. For example, many groups choose to build the statue of a respected person in that person 's hometown. For other monuments, however, there is no clear reason as to why they are where they are. The Lincoln Memorial is a great example of this, because "The site of the Lincoln Memorial...did not even
The first stage in the formation of exempla according to Roller is the performance of an action in the presence of others, yet Augustus’ good deeds in the Res Gestae blatantly fall outside of this criterion. Rather than allow the public to directly view his actions, Augustus decided for himself which sections of his history he would reveal to Romans. Augustus’ selective whitewashing of the accomplishments that he chose to display in the Res Gestae represents the first step in his exploitation of exemplarity to exercise his concealed authority. In order to translate these deeds into exempla, Roller sets forth that the public must judge an action either good or bad in terms of a shared set of values (Roller, 216). Again, Augustus’ writing of the Res Gestae breaks from the application of this framework.
One must keep in mind that, monuments may never make everyone happy. As long as a monument was not made with the intention of attacking a group of people it deserves to be