What people choose to read is their right. The first amendment does state of public schools congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and the petition of the government for a redress of grievances. Unfortunately, some novels are being banned for certain reasons like racial issues, sexual situations, encouragement of “damaging” lifestyles, or violence/negativity. These great novels both teach important morals and values and educate children about world affairs and some classical themes.The education that is given when reading these certain books should be open to anyone and …show more content…
Nowadays some people's view on “appropriate” could be different than someone else's. In certain situations children need to be aware of their surroundings. In addition children do have the right to read whatever they desire. The definition of what is“appropriate” to read needs to be set into place. The government could be banning a book that applies to a student's lifestyle. This also means, that what you read doesn't mean that everyone has to agree with what we read. But learning from what we read, could end up being beneficial. Generally speaking kids will learn how to live in a world of differences. Instead of hiding what the real world is like let them learn what it is like for …show more content…
A perfect example of this is “ Jay Asher, who wrote the best selling book after a close relative attempted suicide as a teenager, said he has spoken at schools in all 50 states and tells students he would not be there if it weren't for teachers who were not afraid to talk about the uncomfortable topics.” By reading these books it can enlightens the child that they are not alone and others are going through similar hardships. It might also help them to talk about what is going on in their life and end up resolving the situation. End your paragraph with a concluding sentence or sentences that reasserts how your paragraph contributes to the development of your argument as a whole. Hopefully by recognizing that talking and opening up about these subjects can overall help the children even asking for help is much better, than not addressing the situation at
In a nation where freedom of speech is advertised and protected, is it right or even ethical to banned certain books from schools? To be honest, there are two main things that should be taken accounted in, the audience for the book and the books purpose. It's silly it believe that everything can be solved by censorship, but it's even sillier to not take note of parents concerns when it comes to what their children learn at school. Take the book "Their Eyes Were Watching God" by Zora Neale Hurston, a very controversial book about a black woman and her experience of romance. The book has been banned in schools not only in the United States but also in many places around the world, because of parents claiming that the books contains "sexual
By limiting what children and students can read, the government is also limiting their education and opportunities for personal growth. Children and students should have the right to choose what they want to read and explore new ideas, and they should not be denied access to information and knowledge because of government censorship. The government's attempt to limit what students can read in schools is also a threat to their education and personal freedom. Schools should provide students with access to diverse sources of information and encourage them to explore new ideas and perspectives.
One more reason I believe banning books are wrong is because, you get more choices. Librarians say that they want kids to have as many reading choices as possible, but by them banning books they can have as many options to pick what they interested in. However, if kids get interested in a series and it is banned in their school library because it is more “mature” that gives the limited options. Jaquan was in the library trying to choose a book he was interested in but he couldn 't because the book he was looking for was banned. Some people say that racial slurs are why they ban some books, but most kids are gonna learn about racial slurs in their social studies class anyway.
“The state of kids publishing is such that it’s perfectly reasonable to be concerned about what agenda-driven and/or prurient content they’re peddling.” (Hemingway) This means it is very reasonable for everyone to be concerned about what the kids and young adults are reading. If parents are not concerned about what their child is reading, their child will follow many bad influences from books they have read. There are many influential books such as The Outsiders, by S.E Hinton that should be banned.
Books are banned for various reasons including religious views, racial themes, alternative lifestyles, profanity, sex, violence, negativity, witchcraft, and political views. Banned books even include holy books, like The Bible or The Quran. Even children’s books have been banned; like Green Eggs and Ham by Doctor Suess. Some studies show that making a chapter, or even an entire book challenged is a much more effective way to get kids to read it, rather than making it homework. Even though people challenge books, we do have the right to read what we want.
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.
Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.
It denies individuals of finding out about their general surroundings. Books should not be banned because of what they appear to be. For instance, restricting books are unlawful and not valuable for schools. '' I don't think a school board can wrap its political concerns in the cloak of educational suitability,'' Mr. Levine said (“Book-Banning Arguments are heard ”). The statement is vital in light of the fact that it gives
Just because some people disagree with some books, does not mean others should not be allowed to enjoy them. Books should not be banned because it closes doors for information that mature people should be able to read. Another reason books should not be banned is that it deprives people of learning experiences that they may encounter soon. Books should not be banned also because some of the books are excellent for history, or learning experiences. Books should not be able to be banned because it closes the door for great lessons and deprives people of learning about the world around them.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Some parents may dislike the books provided at their child's school, but the books are there for the children, not the parents. According to Webster