Should NCAA Football Players get Paid? Did you know that 85% of NCAA football players live below the poverty line? This is just one of the many problems about student athletes in the NCAA. College football players should be paid because they simply do not have enough time for a job between college and sports and these student athletes sacrifice their bodies for the love of the game. First of all, 85% of the NCAA football players live below the poverty line, many of them also come from poor families to make it worse. Football is also the fifth most dangerous sport in america (The Top Tens). Many people in the NCAA football student athletes would not go to college if it wasn't for football (Sanderson). The average football player has about
That a full paid scholarship is plenty enough (McCauley). The ones who introduce this opinion into the conversation fail to understand the daily struggles a college athlete suffers. Without any outcome, college football players are putting forth their utmost effort for no cause. The twenty to twenty five thousand dollar scholarships do not even put a dent in the billions brought in by the NCAA. This is why this situation is so commonly debated as people believe it is highly unfair to the student athletes.
Should college football players be putting in 90 hours a week without pay? The average American full-time job is from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. five days a week. So if they get paid for 40- hour weeks shouldn’t a college football player who puts in 90 hours a week get at least a small paycheck. The average division one football player puts in 43.3 hours a week for football. Also, if you have 10 hours of class each week and you study for the recommended 4 hours for each class you have a total of 50 hours for school.
Football is generally a very dangerous sport, especially at the college level. The players are taking very high risks and are not being compensated for it. According to the Abc news article, “college players
In the course of at least the last 20 years, school games have increased huge/extreme fame for something bad over the United States. Whether it be football, b-ball, or hockey, as far back as the turn of the century, happening between different colleges games have bought have received an excess of income to their particular Universities, and expanding the number of the College 's fame for something bad. For instance, in a review led by the Orland Living Nel, it was tested that the University of Texas ' Athletic Program had the most high income of some other University at $120,288,370 How Much Money. However with this huge total of cash, no school competitors are legally and truly changed to make better to fit new conditions for their work.
Compromising to Get Paid to Play For years college football players have been playing basically for free, and only thing in return that they get would be a trophy or a certificate of participation for the season, but it has also has became a widespread debate in the sports world, and these discussion, and debates that have been going on for a while already for NCAA football players, if they should be paid, because their coaches do, and many people do not think they should, and as time has passed more and more people have been discussing this issue, and the NCAA still sides with not paying the athletes, and if this keeps on athletes could quit, leaving the NCAA losing millions of dollars.. However, football players should be paid, and should
They believe that the players are already being pay with exposure, some of the players go on to play in the NFL and other major leagues where they make millions of dollars. Along with the exposure, they are also given a major amount of grants and scholarships for their education. NCAA revenue numbers aside, it is true all college athletes are amateur-status. According to the NCAA's data released every fiscal year, out of the six major college sports (baseball, men's and women's basketball, men's soccer, hockey and football) the only sport with more than seven percent of its athletes go pro after college was baseball. Only 1.6 percent of college football players end up being drafted into the NFL.
Should college athletes be paid? College athletes deserve to get paid. Many student athletes provide a service to their institution through their performance. Most do not have the means to know what is to live as a individual or learn how to take care of themselves so they could be ready to be out on the real world we live in.
“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.
Should college athletes be paid? Imagine getting a free scholarship, and playing for a team and heightening your chances of playing a professional sport. Well, college athletes have this opportunity. The first reason is that according to the NCAA, it provided 3.6 billion dollars in athletic scholarships. The next reason is Not all college athletes will make it pro, only a few so they should take advantage of the resources they have to learn.
Imagine if you were part of the reason for a collegiate team’s success in win and filling up stadiums, but not having enough money to get your necessities. That is what’s happening to a lot of student-athletes, even some pros have commented on this idea. First off, most college athletes barely have money as it is, so if they run short on money, they aren’t able to call their parents or whoever they lived with to send money to them, then they can’t eat or even worst, they have nowhere to live. Many NFL or other professional athletes would agree that college players should get paid mostly because of lack of free time. “I would love for a regular student, for just one semester, to have a student-athlete schedule during the season and show me
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
Being able to play a sport in college is a gift that not many people receive, it takes hard work and dedication, a thing that has not changed since the first games were played. Over the years college athletics has grown, since the inception of the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) in 1906. The number of sports now allowed in the NCAA is twenty four and the number of schools who support each sport has grown by the thousands. College athletes compared today from fifty years ago have changed drastically because of how long they stay in college, wanting to be paid, and the different recruiting process. What is the difference between four years and a year the obvious answer is three years, but for a college athlete that could mean the make or break of your career.
Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
College athletes already get their education free why should they get paid for playing a sport they love playing. What do you think, should college athletes get paid for playing the sport there in? Well I don’t think so and in this paper I will tell you and give you reasons why they shouldn’t be paid. College athletes are already getting a free education they shouldn’t be allowed to be paid. My topic is why college athletes shouldn’t get paid.