In Ancient Rome, social class was based on hierarchy. Hierarchy essentially means that the people with the most power are the leaders of society. In society this ancient society you were either considered patrician or plebeian. The patricians had more freedom and where a higher class then the plebeians. The patricians were made up of the rulers of Rome and their families and the plebeians were basically everyone else that was not part of the ruling families. All of these classes were determined by the census. Also, there was a group of people that didn’t fall into either of these two categories. These were the slaves. The slaves did not have any rights and were treated as property. However, if they were ever to be freed they were able to …show more content…
For example, patricians were given greater representation in Roman elections. Patricians also had a great impact on religion in ancient Rome. Since they were seen as a higher class, there was a belief that they were better at speaking to the Roman gods. This illustrated the great importance that was given to the patricians because they were seen as the messengers of the gods in many cases. Another luxury the patrician class had was that they were the only class that was allowed to hold public office at first. This was changed however, because there were various uprisings that were held by the plebeians which lead to large groups of them boycotting the city. They did this until their demands were met and they were finally able to serve in public office after these protests. With this being said, there was clear tension between the two groups. The plebeians were doing the most work for the city while the patricians were taking the credit for their work. These various class differences angered the middle class, so there were more little protests that led to a smaller gap between classes. In the later eras of the Roman Empire, the patricians who were once much richer and more powerful started to decline. Some patricians even lost money and were impoverished in the later era. In many cases plebeians had more money than patricians. At this point, the classes in Rome didn’t matter as much as they once
POLITICAL - by keeping the social classes, in continued the trend with political involvement: the higher social classes had more say in the government in comparison to the lower classes. Reduced interdependence of classes by splitting them into sections; now if one class in one group failed, only a portion of the other classes would suffer. Took away some Unitarian power and implemented a diluted form of Federalism. This would disappear after lines between classes blurred and eventually ceased to exist at all, near the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the
Imperial Rome had a democratic government, where the people voted for everything. They had two classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The Plebeians had all the control over the Senate and the Consuls for a while. Eventually, the plebeians were given control over the Tribunes to give them a voice. The patricians were the wealthy, land owners, and the upper class citizens.
The citizens would elect Praetors, these were judges that ruled in the judicial branch and would be voted for each year(AR). Usually only the wealthy Praetors would be elected leaving out the middle and lower class citizens of Rome(AR).Today in The U.S., people can vote on issues that are addressed within America and are also able to vote on who is elected as the president no matter what financial state they are in. In Rome, the lower class citizens also known as the plebeians, were forced into the army and were furious at the fact that
By this time, it took more effort to vote since people were coming from all over to vote. Rome started to add limits, “How easily a small number of urban residents registered in a rural tribe could determine the vote of that tribe is clear from the small percentage of citizens who actually voted.” (Document C) This shows how little the number of people voted that were actually Roman citizens. The Roman Republic started to become an aristocracy whenever a lot more of the wealthy people came into power.
Like all societies with inequality, this issue was the center of the conflicts that existed. The population was divided in two: those of the upper class and those of the lower class. The Upper-class was based on patricians, senators, and equestrians. The patricians were the descendants of the first founders and were the only ones accepted in the Senate, they practically monopolized the highest positions. The senators were part of Senate, were those Upper-class Romans who came from the royal and the Roman political families, they don't have jobs because they were responsible for governing others.
Throughout history, there has been several examples of shifts within the political and economic structures of early era societies. Such shifts are viewed in the Babylonian society under Hammurabi, the Athenian society under Solon as their lawgiver, and, lastly, in the Roman society with Plebeians. The Code of Hammurabi, the reforms of Solon, and the Twelve Tables shared several similarities as well as differences when addressing the issues of class divisions and social hierarchy. Each of them implemented a social stratification alongside several other distinctive standards on their individual societies in the hope to create a peaceful balance. In fact, the elements of socioeconomic status are the prime factors that created this social hierarchy.
They did not have the right to intermarriage or to hold office in the republican government. What made this lower class so important to the patricians was the fact that they made up a large part of the army and
Consequently, they have to borrow money for the survival and fall in the debtor again. However, it seems there was no way out for the plebeians from the poverty. Instead, the patricians were the class who were rich and politically sound to hold any position in the Rome.
Social class played a key role in the Elizabethan Age; without social hierarchy society would have fallen apart, the people did not know of anything else other than the role of classes. Each class had different situations of life, some were wealthy and had nice homes while others were poor and living off of the streets. The class rankings were given to each individual by situations such as birth, fame, wealth, and known skills(“Elizabethan Era.”). One could only move up a class by the Queen's approval, obtaining sudden wealth, going into debt, losing your job, and many other specific conditions(“Elizabethan Era - The Lost Colony.”). For instance, marriage between two people from separate classes could alter social class and was often frowned upon.
The class system that defined Europe during the Middle ages was very similar to the caste system implemented in India. These systems both had a single leader atop the order followed by wealthy landowners and intellectuals. In the Middle ages like India the lowest level of society was subjected to manual labor and harsh living conditions. Also, in both of these systems the gap between wealthy and peasant was extremely large. The people that gained from these conditions were the upper classes because they were able to make a lot of money off the back of these lower-class individuals.
Eva Smith is the most important character in ‘An Inspector Calls’ in my opinion. She is used as a tool by Priestley, to show us how the capitalists treat others and how they don’t care about others and how they think they have power over others in the low working class. “if they didn 't get rid of that girl, I 'd never go near the place again” Sheila Birling sacked Eva Smith form her second job because she was ‘laughing at her’ this is showing us that the upper class do whatever they want because of their wealth, class and privileges. Even though Eva Smith was never on the stage play; she is still important because a working class woman like her cant do anything to the upperclass families; yet she made the Birling family (an upperclass family) feel bad and guilty about their actions and take responsibility for corrupting her life. Eva Smith is the perfect example to show the audience that you might not be affected by this but someone might be and you will be the blame for it.
I believe social classes have defined our society in many ways. In America, they separate people into three different classes: the upper class, middle class, and the lower or working class. Based on wealth and various occupations, social classes determine the population’s status in society. Social classes today define individuals and influence their actions. Although people born in a certain class may choose to stay there, they also have the choice of leaving.
Many controversial things happened during the Islamic revolution. In this essay some of those topics will be discussed and broke down from the book by Marjane Satrapi Persepolis. Marjane Satrapi’s perspective on her book Persepolis affects how she views and presents the revolution, religion, and social classes during the revolution. In short, this essay will show how Marjane doesn’t present these themes in the true ways they were. One of the themes in Persepolis is social class, social class is defined as all of the people of a community or country is divided by their wealth.
If you were wealthy or influential and had an education, you were highly valued for government positions. As time progressed, the church was more involved in the social structure as it was more thoroughly integrated into the citizens’ common life. Citizens were given the right to lead, and many more freedoms were opened up to them. This was the point where social structures with definite lines between statuses with no improvement opportunities began to crumble. The golden and dark ages were nearly as different as I expected.
In that era, it must be more harder to turn out the social class, because there didn't the concept of education, opportunity, but the history and tradition means everything: Patricians are rich class and Plebeians are poor. According to Wikipedia, "This was an effective strategy in the Conflict of the Orders due to strength in numbers; plebeian citizens made up the vast majority of Rome's populace and produced most of its food and resources, while a patrician citizen was a member of the minority upper class, the equivalent of the landed gentry of later times", therefore for the Patrician cause the war, they should treat the Plebeian group for the