2.2.1 Preparation of sPEG from polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitanmonolaurate (tween-20) Star shaped polyoxyethylene (sPEG) was synthesized according to the literature with some changes [18]. Briefly, 8 g of polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearatev were dissolved in 20 ml of THF in a round bottom flask and then 1 g of KOH was added as hydrolysis agent. After refluxing about 24 h, the solution was concentrated and added to a mixture of acidic water/hexane (1 : 1). The aqueous phase in which the sPEG is dissolved was separated by a separation funnel from hexane. Next, the aqueous phase was neutralized with HCl and extracted with dichloromethane. In order to ensure the purification of the sPEG, this process was repeated further three times with yield 86%. 2.2.2. Preparation of carboxyl terminated star shaped PEG (HO-sPEG-(COOH)3) The reaction procedure was done according to the reported literature [18]. Briefly, a solution containing 0.3 gr (3 mmol) succinic anhydride and 0.4 ml (3 mmol) of triethylamine in 10 ml of THF was dropwise added to a stirred solution of 1 mmol of sPEG in 10 ml of anhydrous THF for 12 h at 75 C. The solvent of product solution was evaporated by a rotary evaporator and the obtained dark yellow viscous liquid was dissolved in acidic water (pH= 3). In the following, …show more content…
Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized according to our previously reported method by chemical co-precipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions with a molar ratio of 1:2 [19]. Briefly, 2.4 g of FeCl3.6H2O and 0.8 g of FeCl2.4H2O were dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water under using continuous N2 purge at 70 °C. and Under vigorous stirring, followed by dropwise addition of 10 mL of NH3.H2O was dropwise added to the reaction mixture until the color of mixture turned to black and kept reacting for 90 min to complete the reaction. At the end, the synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles were separated by a magnet and washed by using water and ethanol for further three times with 89.3%
Abstract: In this experiment, triphenylmethanol was synthesized in two steps. First, the bromobenzene was reacted with dry magnesium turnings to produce Grignard reagent. Second, the Grignard reagent was reacted with methyl benzoate and concentrated sulfuric acid to produce an alcohol. The end result of the experiment was not very successful because only 17% yield of final product triphenylmethanol was recovered, and the final product was impure based on the melting point and the IR spectrum results.
While the solution dissolved, 50 mL of distilled water was added to a 150 mL beaker and heated on the hot plate. When the solution started to boil 2.65 grams of Na2SiO3*5H2O was added to the beaker with a stir bar and heated to a gentle boil. When both solutions began to boil, the sodium silicate solution was slowly added to the sodium aluminate. The solution was kept at 900C for 60 minutes and stirred with stir bar. After 60 minutes, the zeolite solution was cooled for 5 minutes and for the magnetized zeolite , 0.78 grams of FeCl3 and 0.39 grams of FeSO4*7H2O was added to the flask and stirred until the iron parts dissolved.
3.1 Project Methodology In order to make sure that this project is on track, proper planning and scheduling is crucial. It is necessary to identify the significant key points which are photocatalytic activity of SWCNTs, properties of carbon nanotubes and titanium oxide, available testing procedures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other spectroscopic methods. In this section, a brief detail provided regarding the methods used, sol-gel, hydrothermal and electrospinning. Also, the available tests that will be used are explained.
My results were fairly reliable, and are very accurate. Beans grow best with fences, poles etc. to climb up. They also prefer full sun. Most of the beans did sprout, but the ones that did probably did not get full sun due to their position. Another factor to explain my results, is the water amount.
Abstract: Molecular analysis of DNA encompasses a series of separation, amplification and detection techniques that are used to determine the source of origin of an organism’s tissue sample. It correlates genes’ sequences with their functions, and allows the identification of the unknown organism. This study was done to see whether the techniques of molecular genetics like extraction and polymerase chain reaction could be used to find the animal whose tissue were sampled. GENEIOUS software was used to analyze and align the electropherograms results before GenBank and BLAST were used to identify the unknown DNA sequence by comparing it to a set of already known sequences. The results indicated that the better the fragmentation of the DNA sequences were in the PCR, the better it would be assayed by electrophoresis and the more samples could be used in the CSR; thus, the more accurate the sequences would be.
Purpose: There are many types of PCR. In this lab, we are using normal PCR. This method is different form the Sanger PCR because normal PCR is a procedure that involves DNA template to be amplified by PCR. The difference is the amplification in sequencing. Normal PCR is making copies in a specific region of DNA.
Observations During the gradual addition of acetic anhydride, the previous solution of aniline later acquired an oil-like layer floating on the surface. Once the mixture was swirled, the solution became cloudy and milky-yellow in colour. The charcoal that was added to the warm solution began clear up the solution. The oil-like droplets began to mix with the solution. Data and Calculations See Lab K report sheet that is attached.
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles of a correctly determined size are appropriate for in vivo hyperthermia applications, as they have no net magnetization without the external magnetic field. No net magnetization
In a typical procedure, TiO2 nanoparticles (TNP, 3.6 g) with pure anatase was added into a NaOH (10 N, 150 mL) solution in a teflon lined stainless steel autoclave, sonicated (2 min) and heated the autoclave at 403 K for 48 h in an oil bath under autogenesis pressure with stirring (250 rpm). After 48 h, the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature, subsequently the formed nanotube was washed with ultrapure water until the pH of the solution was >7. Afterward the nanotubes were washed with HCl (0.1 M) solution for overnight under stirring at room temperature. Then the nanotubes were filtered (Millipore filtration assembly) under vacuum pump and repeatedly washed with ultrapure water until the filtrate was free from chloride ion, which was checked by the addition of silver nitrate to the filtrate. Finally, the obtained nanotubes were dried in an oven at 343 K for 12 h and calcined in a muffle furnace at 773 K for 4 h.
The viscosity of the formulation increased with an increase in Sodium Alginate and Pectin concentration. This phenomenon is a consequence of increasing chain interaction with an increase in polymer concentration. This change in viscosity is proportion to the change in concentration and polymer ratio. The buoyancy lag time in simulated gastric fluid (0.1 mol L-1 HCL, pH 1.2) varied with the formulation variable.
The DEAE CL-6b gel was washed twice with 0.5m Hcl, twice with 0.5m Naoh and twice with PB ph6.0 before utilization. For DEAE 1ml gel every 1ml serum was utilized. In the wake of blending for 1 hour at 200c the suspension was centrifuged at 4500g for 25 minutes. The supernatant was thought by Ammonium sulfate precipitation and pellet was broken up in refined water and the ensuing arrangement was dialyzed against PBS ph7.2 to evacuate Ammonium sulfate and conformed to the first volume with yhe same cushion (Hong et.al., 1994). 2)
The effect of varying gelling agent concentration on viscosity and drug content are reported in Table 5.1 and shown in Figure 5.2 and 5.3 respectively. Table 5.1: Effect of varying Gelling Agent concentration on viscosity and Drug content of Emulgel Batch Code Gelling agent concentration (gm) Viscosity (cp) %
Yellow FeCl3 5% solution is added to the nanoparticle solution with 5% ratio of FeCl3 solution: nanoparticle solution (3 drops: 1 ml). The mixture is then stirred slowly for 30 minutes. The colored nanoparticles solution is then observed with the light microscope (Advanced, Indonesia) using OPTILAB application. Total essential oil
It was previously mentioned that the focus of this study is to use ceria-zirconia (CeO2-ZrO2) as the catalyst support. The approach of A. Poyraz et al. [7] to synthesize varying ratios of CeO2-ZrO2 mesoporous materials was modified and used. The modifications were the following: (a) zirconium (IV) oxynitrate hydrate was used instead of zirconium (IV) butoxide; (b) application of the method for the synthesis of CeO2-ZrO2 solid solution; and (c) physical separation of solids (filtration instead of centrifugation). Cerium nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O), zirconium (IV) oxynitrate hydrate (ZrO(NO3)2∙xH2O), 1-butanol, nitric acid (HNO3) and P123 surfactant
In order to minimize the cost of purification process, heterogeneous solid catalyst such as metal oxides, zeolites, hydroalcites, and γ-alumina have been used recently. Some of these catalysts are promising but some still have low performance compared to homogeneous catalyst in term of FAME yield and activity. The advantages of using heterogeneous are these catalysts can be separated easily from the reaction mixture and can be reuse. Most of these catalysts are alkali or alkaline oxides supported on materials with a large surface and they are more active than solid acid catalysts (Thanh, Okitsu, Boi, & Maeda,