Writing can be an effective way in persuading an audience. Creating a connection to the audience is a difficult task, but if rhetorical writing is used correctly, one's writing can be impactful and effective. The authors, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, of "The Coddling of the American Mind" use rhetorical strategies to evoke interest, and to assist in bringing across meaning to the reader. Some of the effects used include data, quotes from ancient philosophers, and specific word connotation. The rhetorical strategies used by Haidt and Lukianoff are for the most part unsuccessful in convincing college administration that shielding students does more harm than good. They unfairly use a negative-sided word choice, extreme examples, and they …show more content…
For example, according to the article, Lukianoff is, ". . .CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education", and Haidt is, ". . .a social psychologist who studies the American culture wars"(Basictenets). CEO is a powerful position, giving an authoritative look to his stance, and a social psychologist should be a reliable source for analyzing behavior. Another use of the ethos effect is by including quotes from ancient Philosophers such as Socrates, Buddha, and Marcus Aurelius. Haidt and Lukianoff quoted Buddha, “Our life is the creation of our mind"(ThinkingCure). Quotes like this are to insert authority into the reader. The ethos effect can be an effective way for writers to gain respect, credibility, and authority from their …show more content…
The word choice in this article is clearly meant for a negative emotion. Words like violate, danger, and rape are used in attempt to bring out an uncomfortable feeling. For example, according to the article, Jeannie Suk wrote in the New Yorker about Harvard students telling their professors, ". . .not to teach rape law—or, in one case, even use the word violate (as in “that violates the law”) lest it cause students distress"(1,SomethingStr). The authors also use alarming instances in attempt to evoke emotion. One example being the phrases that will trigger certain ethnicities. The article states, ". . .by some campus guidelines, it is a microaggression to ask an Asian American or Latino American 'Where were you born?'"(TriggerWarnings). Other extreme examples are used to bring attention to the issue as well. Another reason this writing might bring worry to college professors and others, are the expressions like, "It prepares them[students] poorly for professional life"(Basictenets). Professors are responsible for teaching content that will be useful for students to succeed in life after college. The authors are trying to reach college administration's emotions through the pathos
The author used different elements of ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos to effectively communicate with the reader. Eve Tushnet the author of this essay does not have a whole lot of ethos. Eve is lacking credibility and character because she is not an established author. Eve is not a credible author because she is a freelance writer. Eve does not have good credibility because she blogs and contributes to an opinion magazine and website.
Every day new technology is advancing to makes its way into the world where it is used more efficiently. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,”, Nicholas Carr claims that human are no longer able to focus on longer texts due to the rise of digital texts. Nicholas Carr includes strong evidences to support his statement; and through the usage of ethos and pathos, he is able to convince his readers that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” (Carr). Examples of Ethos are evident throughout the article making Carr’s argument deductively valid. Nicholas Carr is known for his reputation as someone who has written influential pieces and earning many awards for his accomplishments.
He does not like how his students have taken on the role of the “informed consumer” or the “calm consumer expertise” that fuels their responses (4). His strongest claim here is that universities are “ever more devoted to consumption and entertainment,” and he supports this claim of fact throughout this section by giving his readers a taste of what he is covering in the sections to follow, and it is one of many of Edmundson’s examples of ethos (6). He mentions how critics have many theories as to why and how “education is in crisis,” and he makes a concession by giving that to them, as long as their theories are “used well” (6). Towards the end, Edmundson states that in order to further understand what is behind the culture here in universities, the “realms of expert debate and fine ideas” need to be left behind so that these “experts” can let the behavior of the students on campus and in classrooms speak for itself
Journal Response The chapter “A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers” by Erika Lindemann describes how people use rhetoric unconsciously on their daily lives through writing or speaking. The term rhetoric is explained as being influential; teachers in particular are described to make use of rhetoric means to encourage their students into learning. Nevertheless, the rhetoric term has been under discussion over the years. The initials connotations given to this term were on the negative side; Lindemann describes how thinkers from old times expressed that the term rhetorical was mostly inclined towards the usage of appealing language leaving the importance of the message itself aside.
Text 1, written by Greg Lukianoff is an article titled ‘The Coddling of the American Mind’ taken from a website called www.theatlantic.com in the form of written text. Published in September 2015, it is intended with the purpose to inform and expose the truth about trigger warnings. The writer’s intended audience may be students who witnessed the occurrence trigger warnings within their campus and working adults in colleges and universities. The context of Text 1 is the writer presenting his personal opinion on trigger warnings based on his experiences. Text 2, on the other hand, is an article titled ‘An Optimist’s Guide to Political Correctness’ by Megan Garber.
Through this example, McGray builds credibility for his arguments towards his audience of American legislators who may feel shocked and ashamed due to the absence of general world’s knowledge of the American students. Subsequently, if American legislators accept the existence of this problem, it will encourage them to promptly make changes. Christina tale is remarkably symbolic for the reason that it is the first key the author provides to intentionally engage American legislators into the reading and encourage them to incorporate multicultural studies in the American education. McGray uses Christina’s tale as a sample to provide to American legislators the actual state of the American education. Even though anecdotes are not considered scientific proofs, they still dominate people’s thinking due to the fact that they have a convincing appeal that relates people on a more personal level.
In addition, she appeals to the emotions of her audience by writing on a deeper emotional level and referring to college as a self-finding, life-changing experience, rather than another unpleasant chore in one’s life. Throughout Addison’s article she successfully builds strong emotional connections with her readers through words of philosophy and personal experience. Addison’s techniques for appealing to the emotions of the audience are undoubtedly
Reading Summary Evaluation #3 In Karen Stabiner's article "Boys Here, Girls There: Sure If Equality's the Goal," she uses a logical and emotional argument to convince her readers that single-sex schools can really be a good option in the educational system, and that they can also be very helpful and effective. Stabiner uses all three rhetorical strategies in her argument: pathos, ethos and logos to support her argument. On the other hand, in the Daniel J. Solove"s article "Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have Nothing To Hide," he argues that the problem of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding something wrong. Solove explains what privacy is and the importance that privacy holds.
Gladwell uses Ethos as well in Blink quite frequently. The way he uses ethos to confirm the credibility of the hypothesis and research he expresses. Through ethos we are persuaded to believe the research is true and that we can put trust in the
The use of ethos in the form of earned titles within the community-Coach Albert, Deacon Jones, Professor Miller-are diminishing as "truthful" signifiers while commercial-name signifiers or icons a ppear on clothing-Ralph Lauren, Louis Vuitton, Tommy Hilfiger- disclosing a person 's cultural ethos not in terms of a contributor to the community, but in terms of identity-through purchase. Aristotle warns us away from such decoys, telling us that the appeal from ethos comes not from appearances, but from a person 's use of language. In a culture where outward appearances have virtually subsumed or taken over the appeal from inner (moral and intellectual) character, the appeal from ethos becomes both problematic and important.
In her article, she refers to college as a place to broaden knowledge, “It is, hopefully, a space where the student is challenged and sometimes frustrated and sometimes deeply upset, a place where the student's world expands and pushes them to reach the outer edges – not a place that contracts to meet the student exactly where they are” (Filipovic). From this previous statement, we can conclude that the unexpected in college challenges a student to push their knowledge; however, we should not adapt the learning process to meet students’ needs. A trigger warning serves as protection against a wide range of controversial categories. It is true multiple things could trigger an emotional response, even things as little as skulls, blood, or pregnancy. The discretion on whether a topic can send a student into emotional turmoil is unpredictable.
In the article, “College Pressures,” William Zinsser discusses the many struggles college students face while trying to focus on their studying. He convinces the reader of his point by using different types of rhetorical strategies. Zinsser’s usage of the rhetorical strategies such as getting straight to the point, quoting, paragraphing, the use of word pictures, and choosing a title was effectively done in his article to persuade his reader of the struggles faced by college students. The author did not waste anytime getting to the main point in his article, which is effective because it makes me interested in what he had to say.
David Foster Wallace uses a combination of rhetorical literary devices and modes of persuasion to convince his audience, Kenyon College’s graduating class, that in their adult life it is not only important, but necessary to look past themselves and view the world without themselves at the center. If they do not do so, it will cause them daily misery and pain when having to interact with people when they are tired or bored. Wallace is able to persuade his audience by first gaining credibility with them, so they are more willing to listen to what he has to say. Then, he uses logical reasons as to why they should not put themselves above others in their lives, and solidifies the lesson through emotional appeals that most of the class can relate to and use to grow from. Throughout his speech he uses a variety of rhetorical tools to persuade the audience further, such as his use of anaphora, and syntax in the way he presents his ideas.
A Look Inside: “The Coddling of the American Mind” In the September 2015 issue of The Atlantic, the article, “The Coddling of the American Mind” co-written by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathon Haidt, was published. In this article, Lukianoff and Haidt make the argument that students of American colleges have become increasingly sensitive towards speech that could be deemed “offensive” or “triggering. And in an effort to appease students as well as avoid any possibility of a lawsuit being brought against them, colleges have become more willing to accommodate classes, by removing this type of speech from the curriculum.
In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, he states that the decline of interest in literature—especially from young teens—will have a negative outcome in society. Notably, he informs the readers by utilizing strong vocabulary, as well as rhetorical appeals to persuade his audience that the decline in reading will have a negative outcome. This allows readers to comprehend his views and join his side of the argument. Gioia’s word choice assists in showing the magnitude of the text by stressing the meaning and importance of his argument.