In Alan Dawley’s, “Class and Community”, Dawley portrays the transformation of Lynn, Massachusetts through the depiction of shoemakers and how the Industrial Revolution shaped their community’s overall way of life, and how a simple town of artisans became an epicenter for a nation the was becoming an industrial powerhouse. “Equal Rights” and community went together in Lynn as they both demand respectability and living up to certain standards. Before the central shop, most any land or building was a means of production, but once they came into the picture, they became the symbol for production. The pursuit of “equal rights” in Lynn made them a “microcosm of the industrial revolution” because everyone was fighting for the same cause, not just men, but both sexes. The treatment of the employees by factory owners was so unjust that people set aside other problems and struggles and came together under one cause, to fight something bigger than themselves. …show more content…
These factories affected laborers as manufacturers rounded them up from their homes and placed them in these factories with new machines and methods to produce their goods, which eliminated the need for binders and journeymen. The floating population came into existence due to these factories, which created a “seasonal cycle”, where production peaked during certain months, and slacked during others, which created an ebb and flow of labor demand. The careers of Pratt, Breed, and Newhall were an example that “if I can make it, you can make it”, which relieved some of these pressures of labor intensity. They came up from simple artisans to owners of central shops and became even bigger than that. They displayed that anyone can make it if you put in the
Class and Community by Alan Dawley is a book written about the impact that factories and industrialization had on little towns such as that of Lynn, Massachusetts. This book goes into strong detail about how the lives of factory shoemakers were forever changed when the industrial revolution came about. The industrial revolution was such a game changer for these shoemakers mainly due to the factory system it introduced and the hardships that came with that. This book was originally written to show how many hardships these shoemakers had to go through and the massive difference they made in the path of the industrial revolution so the little man was not overlooked.
Often small simple objects are overlooked by people for having little importance to our world. In “Fashioning Moccasins: Detroit, the Manufacturing Frontier, and the Empire if Consumption, 1701-1835,” Catherine Cangany, shows how footwear transformed North America’s Frontier. Cangany argues that through observing the small frontier town of Detroit you can see the western frontier’s change through the study of moccasins. Her argument is persuasive because she chronologically structures her article, effectively shows Detroit’s transformation, and gives a variety of examples allowing the reader to see the influence of moccasins through industry, culture, and politics.
How did the Rise of Factories Change American Family, Social, Economic, and Political Life? After the war of 1812, people began to think manufacturing was a brilliant idea. Manufacturing inside the United States would benefit the economy tremendously. Manufactured goods appealed more to the people than homemade, the price was a lot cheaper.1 (textbook) In 1790 Samuel Slater brought over ideas from England to create the first cotton spinning mill in Pawtucket, Rhode Island2
As the industrial boom began to take ahold of the nation, a select few hardworking and determined men seized opportunity
The “Shirtwaist Kings,” Issac Harris and Max Blanck were immigrants from Russia that owned the Triangle Shirtwaist factory. The factory was modern with high ceilings and large windows located in New York’s Greenwich Village, not far from mansions and the elegant shops of the Ladies Mile. Even in a modern factory like The Triangle factory the life of an American industrial worker was far from easy. Factory work meant wages as low as $0.13 an hour, long 14 hour days seven days a week, in hazardous working conditions.
Most of the women that worked in the mills where daughters of farmers in the colonies and they would later be known as the “Mill Girls”. Many of the same women that left their homes to go to the factories did not become lifetime factory workers. Most left the factories after a couple years to go out and start their own family. But it wasn’t before the “Mill Girls” showed that women are an important factor in the American family and a driving force in the success of the American
The textile factories were an unsafe and unheathly place for working class families to work. These factories were unsafe for children to work because the factories would over work the children,give them a insuffient diet and the factories were filled with diseases. For example a testimony from Joesph Hebergram to the Sadler committee he said; ‘i have damged lunges. my lgs muscles do not function properly and will not support the weight of my bones... the doctor told me that it was caused by dust in the factory,from being over worked and a insufficient diet.
John Leo is the author of “Nanny boo-boo’s.” Throughout this essay, Leo gives multiple examples of nannyisms and how it affects people. Leo is an editor for Mindingthecampus.com and was also a contributing editor at the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal, (Minding the Campus 6). He is the author of three books, and for 17 years his column “On Society” has been ran in the U.S. News & World Report and has been associated with 140 newspapers through the Universal Press Syndicate (Minding the Campus 6). Because John Leo is well known for his work as an author and editor, one might infer that he is credible and legitimate.
Without this kind of advancement from these men’s multiple inventions and factories which created many jobs. The World would still be thirty years behind in technologies. Jobs were created in droves because of these men, which means a lot of people got to work and a lot of people were able to support their families. The opportunities that were opened up for the average American were increased ten-fold because of the rapid expansion that these men were creating. The types of work that became available to the working man were mainly factory jobs such as repair the machines if they broke-down which happened a lot.
These Ideas of hard work and perseverance maximized the efficiency of production. Because of all of the industrialization and immigration some problems began to emerge including, the crowding of urban areas,unequal wealth, and unemployment due to better machines or manufacturing techniques. Due to the stratifying class levels many new immigrants fell into lower levels of the wealth pyramid. This caused ethnic neighborhoods where people of the same social class, economic, status, and ethnicity lived in one area and sometimes not in the greatest conditions. One of the biggest and most Symbolic Industries of this time period was the railroad.
Without a doubt, industrialization was one of the biggest factors in how the United States developed. It gave us the means of mass production, better transportation, and eventually the consumerist society that the United States is today. Industrialization did drastically change American society, but did it change America for the better? Did it do more good than bad? While industrialization did lead to multiple social and economic problems, the advantages significantly outweigh the disadvantages.
During the Industrial Revolution while the United States economy boomed it was at the expense of the underprivileged lower class. Florence Kelley was a prominent figure during this tumultuous time who brought light to issues such as women's rights, and child labor. She spoke to various conventions including the National American Woman Suffrage Association about these issues in an attempt to spark change. Specifically at this event she discusses the topic of child labor and calls women to action even though they cannot yet vote. Kelley utilizes logos, imagery, and theoretical examples to convince these women to petition and spread the ideas for preventative legislation surrounding child labor.
Often, their family’s stability was their motive to work in such an environment. The mills and factories
“A Rose for Emily” takes place in a small southern town called Jefferson. Miss Emily who is the main character represents a “fallen monument” to the town. She is a small piece of history from the town’s pre-civil war lifestyle. The town undergoes modern progression throughout the story. Faulkner uses Miss Emily, Homer Barron, and the town of Jefferson to symbolize progression in the South.
ohn Stuart Mill ‘The Subjection of Women’ was composed in 1861 but was not published until the year 1869. Using irrefutable logic and true eloquence, Mill (1999) argues that in the legal system of The Great Britain women are dominated and controlled. According to Mill (1999), the involuntary vulnerability of women started ages ago when physical force transformed into authority and law. Furhtremore, he argues that women’s legal condition needs to be reviewed in order for the the nation to remain healthy (Mill,1999).