The Guns at Last Light, Rick Atkinson’s final book in his Liberation Trilogy, focuses on WWII from 1944-1945 in Western Europe. Atkinson constructs a book which is incredibly well researched, and concentrates on the war from the Allied perspective. Unlike many scholarly works, Atkinson’s work does not immediately state a thesis. Rather, Atkinson crafts his story in such a way that his thesis is revealed over time. In this way, Atkinson argues that the Allied regime succeeded over the Axis powers because of their cohesion and the American’s resources. He supports this thesis by emphasizing the might of the American economy and focusing on the strength of the Allies’ alliance, and supports both arguments well. Atkinson also implies that …show more content…
His argument is plagued by a lack of primary resources on the Axis alliance and writer’s bias. Rather than using his numerous resources to prove his claim, Atkinson merely claims that the Axis alliance is worse than the allied alliance while failing to provide as much argumentation on the subject as he did concerning the Allied alliance. His arguments against the Axis alliance were often similar to the following quotation: “The Allied way of war won through, with systems that were… ‘Centralized, unified, and coordinated,’ quite unlike the Axis systems” (Atkinson 632). Such a claim fails to provide hard evidence or an argument as to why the Axis systems lacked centralization, unification, and coordination. Furthermore, Atkinson’s weak assertion is not backed by extensive source use, like he supported his two previous claims (Atkinson 813-841). In his previous argument his use of sources made the claims strong and persuasive, but with this argument a lack of sources to back his claims makes the argument frail and impotent. An addition factor which makes his claim weak is the bias inherited as an American writer selling to American consumers. Not only is Atkinson more likely to side with the Allied forces due to nationalism, but he is also selling his book to Americans who likely share a similar nationalist bias with Atkinson and would thus be more inclined to read a pro-American account of
In Nathan philbrick book the last stand he cover much as Custer's and Indians and how it was a last stand for both. Philbrick did a great job of narrative two very different wordviews with the evidence he had with written and oral testimony, But with photographs and maps. Now it's a outsiders view but he has a lot of evidence to back his clames. The battle of Little Bighorn has had a lot of books written about in America frontier, but Philbrick delivers a very detailed and captivating telling of Little Bighorn.
World War II (WWII) is a very common topic discussed in high school english classes mainly due to the facts that WWII is a perfect example of good vs. evil in the real world and there is an endless amount of books written about this tragic era in history. Two examples of these type of books are Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken and Elie Wiesel’s Night; and like all of the other WWII books, these two address themes about the hardships of war and how hope is always present. One specific theme that these books support is that in war, there will always be peace; this is shown through elements of faith, happiness, and trauma. To begin, the two main characters of the books Unbroken and Night face a struggle with their individual faiths, but in very different ways. Louis (Louie) Zamperini initially was not the most religious man but when faced with the most dire of situations he turned to God repeatedly for help and counsel.
Harry Truman evidently demonstrates ultranationalist actions and motives to a moderate extent, accordingly, he is guilty of crimes involving the mistreatment, internment, and use of nuclear warfare against the Japanese peoples. Arguments on whether or not he is an ultranationalist are debatable to a considerable extent. Nevertheless, due to the complexity of the issue, the most reinforced position points to a moderate degree of ultranationalism for various reasons. Although Harry Truman was responsible for the death of 129 to 246 thousand Japanese civilians as a direct result of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he ultimately prevented further casualties.
Sidney Bradshaw Fay provides his stance on the controversial topic through his book Origins of the World War, that each European power had leaders which either initiated military mobilization or they have failed to prevent such an outcome
‘’The Sniper" is a short story by Irish writer Liam O'Flaherty, set during the early weeks of the Irish Civil War, during the Battle of Dublin and "The Scarlet Ibis" is a short story written by novelist James Hurst. It was first published in The Atlantic Monthly in July 1960 and won the "Atlantic First" award. Each of the two stories have many likenesses and differences, in addition to focusing on the three same ideas. These three ideas are war, brotherhood, and regret. The war in “The Sniper” is an actual war.
This article examines the background of the Allied Bombing of Dresden. In 1945, the “Big Three” Allied leaders made up of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin decided to make a move to end the Nazis once and for all. During the final months of World War II, British bombers dropped many lethal and toxic bombs from February 13 to February 15. Dresden’s air defenses were easily subdued because Hitler had moved most of remaining forces to Berlin. However, the bombing was controversial due to the fact that Dresden didn’t contribute much to the war effort.
Soon after the Treaty of Versailles’ ratification, Hitler unified Germany by scapegoating Jews and “liberal traitors”, radicalized a new Nazi nationalism, and used anger towards the Treaty of Versailles as a platform to create “justified” conflicts with other nations. Meanwhile, over in Japan, increased propaganda directed at youth, such as the Japanese booklet in Doc. J, ridiculed Western leaders (creating tension) and glorified Japan’s taking over of surrounding land in an attempt to foster Japanese pride, a behavior that would prove to effectively intimidate the Western powers. Similarly, in America, new pride as the world’s “best hope” for mankind (Doc. C) led to a national sense of American “superiority”, which isolated it from the rest of the world while granting further unification. Finally, in Italy, Mussolini united his people under a new doctrine of Fascism, which attacked all forms of communism, socialism, and capitalism.
Can an antiquated lens provide an adequate examination and understanding of modern warfare? The theories of Carl von Clausewitz retain remarkable contemporary merit and relevance in explaining the critical elements affecting warfare in the modern era. Carl von Clausewitz’s theories of war endeavor to be comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic. Clausewitz contends that the conduct of war itself is without doubt very difficult. But the difficulty is not that erudition and great genius are necessary to understand the basic principles of warfare.1 Clausewitz 's 1812 essay, the Principles of War, offers military commanders, with little campaign experience, a comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic model for attaining victory in battle.
On June 18, 1940, Winston Churchill addresses the House of Commons, and later the British public, on the devastating blow the allied forces received in Belgium and their highly successful retreat with the assistance from the British Navy. Winston Churchill’s speech, “Their Finest Hour,” motivated the British people to continue fighting a war that approached ever closer. Through the sheer will of his words, did he join together a nation to stand up against a mighty foe. In this speech, Churchill uses his mastery of rhetorical speaking to promote patriotism and duty among the people while also using logic to ensure they have a fighting chance all wrapped in beautiful poetry.
A Modern Day Imperial Power Presently, the presence of injustice, disorder, and poverty are all problems demanding a need for an active imperial power to solve them. Throughout the past two centuries, America has emerged as a capable modern day imperial power. As an imperial power, America has the ability to spread its economic, cultural and military influence internationally, majority of which benefits foreign nations. Likewise, imperialism is a widespread concept amongst existing and rising imperial powers due to the beneficial impacts it has on everyone—for example, economical, political, military, growth and cultural benefits. America’s ascent in strength and power was driven and motivated this imperialistic interest for everyone, having grown to become one of the most strongest forces in the world, it is a moral responsibility for America to aid less fortunate nations and people.
“How far do you agree with the view that British Generals like Haig were incompetent?” This essay will argue that British generals like Haig were incompetent! However, a handful of individuals might believe that British generals like Haig were war heroes and that our country is forever in debt. These people might say that Britain the war, so clearly the generals did their job well. They could also point out that these brave leaders only did what they could in such limited time and with such limited resources and that the weight of our world should not be on their shoulders.
Throughout The Last Shot: City Streets, Basketball Dreams, Russell Thomas has shown again and again that he is a restless, ambitious person willing to do whatever it takes to reach his goal of getting a job as a nurse. This biography was written by Darcy Frey in 1991, showcasing the lives of four students from Lincoln High School who tried to make it out of the neglected Coney Island through basketball. Frey talked about the struggles of living in a community where violence was common, and where success was elusive for many. As a result of the problems of the deficient education system, family conflicts, and the adversities of college signings, basketball seemed like the only way to get out of poverty and despair, especially for people like Thomas. When Frey spots Thomas watching his friend Tchaka play
Rhetorical Essay Analysis World War II is a time of great struggle for humanity, especially for those within the midst of the battlegrounds. During the June of 1940 in an attempt to boost his citizen’s morale and confidence, Winston Churchill, then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (UK), gave his speech “We shall fight on the beaches” at the British House of Commons. The rhetorical purpose of this speech is to convince the people of the UK that they have a fighting chance against the Axis forces, even if the worst comes to show. In order to gain people’s support, Churchill employed the rhetorical strategies of historical evidence and emotional appeal.
This shows how if the US did not get involved in any European affairs citizens would not have to manufacture weapons and vehicles for fighting. When the US goes to war, it affects the whole country. Furthermore, another cost for the US was the loss of soldiers to illness and fighting. The US had deployed
The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the study of International Relations, the book for which E.H. Carr is perhaps most remembered was written just prior to the outbreak of World War Two (WWII). This particular work of Carr’s is primarily a study of the fundamentals of International Relations, which is exemplified especially by the events of the two decades before 1939, the year the book was published. In the Twenty Years Crisis, E.H. Carr explores the interplay of the worldview between Utopians and Realists. Carr’s work examines why the League of Nations and the peace as implemented by the Treaty of Versailles failed, ultimately resulting in WWII.