Scott Bonn’s analysis of moral panic within societal groups discusses the conditions that allow authoritative figures to take advantage of the public and use them to fulfill their own political agendas. Analyzing research by renowned criminologist Stanley Cohen, Bonn uses this study to support his thesis for the conditions allowing moral panic to occur and how the media and political figures can benefit. Discussing society’s irrational fears targeted towards specific groups or threats, Bonn believes these fears to be a product of fear-mongering from state officials and media. In exchange, these figures gain the spread of their rhetoric and more attention. Bonn then lists the factors of the formation of moral panic within society: "folk devils" …show more content…
Scott A. Bonn, the author of this article, is a criminologist with a Ph.D. and a professor of criminology at Drew University. As someone familiar with both criminal behavior and psychology, Bonn is extremely well-versed on this article's topic of mass panic and its usage as a form of manipulation. Having already written a critically acclaimed book on political propaganda called “Mass Deception: Moral Panic and the U.S. War on Iraq” it is evident that Scott Bonn is qualified and educated on this topic. Additionally, Bonn's being an entrusted source by several reputable media stations such as NBC, CBS, and A&E, further proves his dependability. Furthermore, this article’s accuracy is evident through its own reliable sources, citing research by renowned criminologist Stanley Cohen a professor and author of “Folk Devils and Moral Panic” and Gaye Tuchman professor of sociology and author of “Making News: A Study in the Social Construction of Reality”. The transparent usage of other qualified professionals in the field and their books as well as real-world examples within these novels prove the accuracy of this article. To summarize, Scott Bonn's article on the topic of manipulation by political figures using moral panic is trustworthy due to his own qualifications on this topic as well as the accuracy of his sources …show more content…
Analyzing both historical and modern societal examples of mass hysteria, Small details the contributing factors of mass hysteria including: psychological stress, anxiety, and group pressure. Small remarks that in a state of panic or hysteria, humans tend to misread normal and often logical manifestations such as stomach pain or scratches on their vehicles as something much more severe, even more so when they are in a situation where groupthink is prevalent. This article goes on to remark the impact of hierarchy on mass hysteria as the public is more likely to follow, trust and agree with their leader. Small deduces that the physical manifestations of mass hysteria originate from an environment in which group dynamics are prevalent, concluding that it has the potential to appear anywhere in
For example, white males are considered mentally ill when they are accused of mass shootings, while people of color are considered as thugs or terrorists, the news media reinforces the narrative that the lone wolf is an aberration. (Butler 1). Adding on, Butler argues that mass shootings are not racial issue; the issue is what the shooters skin color have to do with the mass shootings. Contradicting from Butler’s
In the years since the SHES massacre, many of the victims’ families and others involved in the shooting have received harassment. The father of the youngest victim, Leonard Pozner, and his family “received hate-filled calls and violent emails from people who say they know the shooting was a hoax” (Demick). Recently, several people have been arrested due to their harassment, such as a woman in Florida who was arrested with “making death threats against Pozner, with repeated phone calls to his home in which she muttered ethnic and racial slurs and profanities” (Demick). These instances of harassment contradict the statistic that belief in the conspiracy theories has decreased. In the most recent survey conducted by PublicMind in 2016, only eight percent of those surveyed agree that the government was involved in the SHES shooting (Cassino).
People who intend to cause harm feed off on the panic they cause. Fox argues that the media and the administration have a huge impact in the way people process these events. From the amount of information, they give not only after but during these events lead people into either doing something similar to try and claim their 15 minutes of fame or cause people to panic every second of every day in fear of when it will happen to them and the cycle continues again and again. When people are locked in a room scared and looking at the news to try and make sense of what is happening it can make things worse due to the inaccurate information the media has at times and it adds to the fear you already have of being locked in a room waiting for something to happen. This builds and builds until everyone is panicking and it leads to people getting hurt.
Fear is a dangerous tool, for it can be used in countless ways and for numerous objectives. Politics of fear is the concept that people may incite fear in the general public to achieve political or workplace goals through emotional bias. Two examples of politics of fear being used in the past to “convince” people to do something are the witch trials in Salem and the McCarthy hearings. While far apart in time, they are extremely similar in idea and process, both had an end goal of getting their respective “defendants” to incriminate themselves.
Strong shifts in popular opinion have led to countless executions across the world. Adolf Hitler convinced the people that Jews were the enemy and far from the “superior race” that he believed in. The United States set up concentration camps for Japanese people after the bombing of Pearl Harbor because the U.S. government strongly believed that there were Japanese spies here in the U.S. Both of these examples show how dangerous and even deadly mass hysteria can be. Rumors, government or authority actions, media, and cultural beliefs are all major causes of mass hysteria.
The relentless media coverage of mass shootings like Columbine contributes to inspiring potential copycats and more acts of violence. Several studies have demonstrated a connection between media coverage of mass shootings in similar incidents that happen later, showing how the media accidentally encourages a so-called cycle of violence. According to a study by the American Psychological Association, intense media coverage and other publicity can contribute to an increase in the likelihood of similar events and tragedies occurring within the following weeks. This emphasizes the responsibility the media organizations have to report
School-related shootings, particularly those that are dramatic in nature, evoke strong public outcry, and justifiably so. Following an apparent spate of incidents occurring between 1997 and 2001, it seemed as if the USA was on the brink of a moral panic concerning delinquency to young youth. Since then, "Columbine has become a keyword for a complex set of emotions surrounding youth, risk, fear, and delinquency in 21st century America" (Muschert 2007). One alarmist (Stein 2000) went so far as to label Columbine as a metaphor for a contemporary crisis of youth culture.
During the 2014 Ebola panic, a research group consisting of scholars from Arizona State University, Purdue University, and Oregon State University found that, as each news report relating to the ebola virus was released, an increase in ebola related searches within social media bases, like Twitter, occured (Towers, Afzal, Bernal, Bliss, et al., 1). These searches consisted of the symptoms and spread of the virus. The increase shows that the news, a trusted entity in American society, constantly running articles gives rise to panic of disease in people’s daily life. Even though there were only a few people to contract the Ebola virus, the news played segments on the disease as if a pandemic was inevitable, thus increasing the fear in American citizens. In addition to the Ebola virus panic that swept the nation in 2014, a malfunction with an online epidemic tracker caused widespread hysteria over the influenza virus (Towers, Afzal, Bernal, Bliss, et al., 1).
According to The South End Press Collective (1998), Much of what threatens our well-being is a product of dominating structures. History has shown us the effect of social norms in society and the political implications related to fear and the misuse of power. It is important to understand the historical role that fear plays in society. The basis of fear can be used as a means of manipulation, with those in power playing on people's deepest fears to maintain their position (Miller, Lisa L 2015). Fear applies not only to those being controlled but also to the controllers themselves.
Mass hysteria is a condition affecting a group of persons, characterized by excitement or anxiety, irrational behavior or beliefs, or inexplicable symptoms of illness. Since the beginning of time everyone has dealt with mass hysteria. One mass hysteria that connects to this story is the hysteria about the Ebola virus infecting everyone. The Ebola virus by definition is a usually fatal disease, a type of hemorrhagic fever, caused by the Ebola virus and marked by high fever, severe gastrointestinal distress, and bleeding. We all know how rare the chances are of actually getting infected yet no one cares.
The growth of hysteria in America exemplifies people’s tendency to abuse newly-gained power and is supported by Americans’ intolerance of unpopular ideologies. During times of hysteria, one often show his or her true natures. Therefore, human nature can be most easily observed in such times. During times of hysteria, people exploited fear among the public to gain more power, which they abused.
Hysteria, it can play in tearing apart a community most deffinetly. Hysteria is so crazy that is enables people to believe that their neighbors who have always been considered great people are commiting awful crimes such as contacting the devil, and killing babies. In the end, hysteria can thrive only because people can benefit from it. Hysteria suspends the rules of daily life and it allows people to release the anger, the dark side, and the hatefulness under the cover of what is
Mass Hysteria Humans have a tendency to want to fit in and belong, causing numerous problems in society. Throughout history, there have been various cases of mass hysteria within groups of individuals. For example, randomly meowing nuns in France and an entire town believing that at night a monkey man watched them. Several specialists believe the behavior has come about due to mass hysteria. Mass hysteria is delusional thoughts, rumors, and fears that spread quickly through a group of people.
ISBN: 978-0-314-28907-0 This text examined in-depth false claims and statements, bribes,
Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher