In the first chapter, the metaphysical grounds for Swinburne’s concept of a triune God have been examined and reached the conclusion that there is a higher probability of the existence of a divine individual. In the second chapter, Swinburne’s reasons for considering if there is a divine individual, then there must be three and exactly three divine individuals were presented. The third chapter demonstrated that, despite the considerable complexity of Swinburne’s concept of a triune God in comparison to other three-self theories concerning the Trinity, the former has a better explanatory power, the most reasonable interpretation and coherency. The third chapter also presented the Swinburne’s concept of a triune God avoids some of the difficulties …show more content…
Response to Objections
Even if one resonate with Swinburne in his concept of a trinune God, some questions needs to be clarified such as whether the perfection of the divine beings requires dependence (even among themselves), the necessity of being loved for the divine persons, the difference between the Father’s creation of the Son (admitting the inevitable existence of the Son) and the creatures, the justification for the use of the term «create» to denote the existence of the Son and the Holy Spirit, the causal dependence relations among the divine persons. The responses to these questions are presented with the help of objections from the various scholars and at the end the necessary modifications are presented.
Since Swinburne’s concept of a triune God has gone through a process of further modifications and clarifications, the latest versions are always considered for study. Thus for example, Swinburne is more careful in The Christian God than in «Could there be More than One God» to use the term ‹God› as such only when refers the Trinity and not to the divine persons individually.
4.1.1. Tritheism Peter van Inwagen on his article in the Routledge Encylopedia of Philosophy points out that even after a positive evaluation of Swinburne’s concept of a triune God, the suspicion of tritheism is debatable
He inspired his followers to write the bible. They also believe that God is in the form of Three Persons. It is called, “Trinity.” It basically means that God is a Spirit. God is supernaturally God.
The existence of God has been presented by a multitude of philosophers. However, this has led to profound criticism and arguments of God’s inexistence. The strongest argument in contradiction to God’s existence is the Problem of Evil, presented by J.L Mackie. In this paper, I aim to describe the problem of evil, analyse the objection of the Paradox of Omnipotence and provide rebuttals to this objection. Thus, highlighting my support for Mackie’s Problem of evil.
IV. The Problem of Evil So far, we have examined only arguments for the existence of God. But for each argument, we have also discussed some objections. Some theists may accept all these objections and yet maintain a belief in the existence of God.
On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).
In his posthumously published published work Father, Son and Holy Spirit: Toward a Fully Trinitarian Theology (2003), the focus is also primarily on Creation.2 The doctrine of creation based on a purposive Trinitarian ontology is therefore important in Gunton's theology. The section below expounds how, according to Gunton, the doctrine of creation has its ontological antecedence from the purposive Trinitarian creator God, who continues to relate with his human and non-human creation, and intends to bring them back to his original plan for them. In that project, Gunton argues, God graciously involves humans to participate. This section will then first look at the key influences on Gunton's doctrine of creation, and secondly at the overall shape of his doctrine, then thirdly at the main features of Gunton's doctrine of
The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.
Descartes, and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However David Hume would refute these claims saying through his dialogues more specifically through a character named Philo that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that we cannot know these things. In Paley’s argument he says that if we saw a rock lying on the ground and someone said that rock had always been there that is conceivable, whereas if a watch were lying on the ground that answer would no longer be acceptable.
The spiritual reason for the unitary call is to imitate the trinitarian
The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that
According to Johnson, I learned that the creeds did not justify how God could also be triune but the creeds acknowledges it. It is confusing how God is described to be God revealed on earth and in heaven. It is like he is everywhere. It is interesting how the Trinitarian is not for us to understand by to reveal God and his mysteries.
The doctrine of the Trinity explains several parts of both our orthodoxy as well as our orthopraxy. Frankly, there are many things that we do now (and have done for most of Christian history) that do not make any logical sense without it. Prayer is does not line up logically without both a Holy Spirit as well as a Father. How else could we believe that our words would ever be sufficient for the Creator? Romans tells us that the Holy Spirit intercedes and becomes the interpreter between us and the Father.
Baruch Spinoza’s geometric structured view on the universe, and everything in general, is beautifully broken down for present and future thinkers to ponder in his work, Ethics. Although complex at times, his method of demonstrating each discoveries of proved proposition aids readers to conceptual God-Nature. At the base of these propositions are definitions and axioms (truths) Spinoza accounts as certain truths and are critical to understanding God-Nature (substance). I will here provide an account of Spinoza’s substance monism and attribute pluralism, along with strengths and weaknesses in his arguments for this picture of reality.
SOME OTHER REFLECTIONS The doctrine of Trinity is the foundation of Christianity. One cannot comprehend God’s creation, salvation, the call to community, prayer, and many other expressions of the Christian faith without it. There are several considerations that Trinitarian Theology alone can make sense of. First, the nature of God is impossible to explain apart from Trinitarian Theology.
It is not important to believe there way of the doctrine of the Trinity, but having this attitude and knowing it is wrong Also, they deny that the Father, Son, and Spirit, are not fully divine, as we disagree for God announces His essential personal or interactive characteristics.
Another theme of Aquinas is that it’s impossible for humans to understand the supernatural order if God did not travel to us the meaning and existence. Without the power of grace God has granted, it will be difficult for our human minds to understand something that transcends our knowledge. On his third theme, Aquinas illustrates the supernatural order would transcend