A former Ohio representative, Dennis Kucinich in the web article, We Didn’t Have to Drop The Bomb published on the 70th anniversary of the Japan bombings addresses the topic of the use of the atomic bomb and passionately argues that the use of nuclear weapons were not necessary in order to capitulate Japan by listing many quotes from high ranking government officials and giving his own personal opinion. Kucinich supports his claim by using factual quotes from credible sources such as Admiral William Leahy, who believed in that Japan would have surrendered without the use of atom head of staff; therefore, proving to the audience that others also believe in his cause. The author’s overall purpose of writing this article is to persuade the American …show more content…
Kucinich a trustworthy representative of the grand state of Ohio compiled a list of powerful people from the war time that disagreed with the use of the atomic bomb on Japan. Henry Arnold, commanding general of the U.S. Air Forces stated that “The Japanese position was hopeless even before the first atomic bomb fell because the Japanese had lost control of their own air” (Kucinich 2). As stated by Henry Arnold, the Japanese had lost their air superiority in their own country, which aside from the naval control costs you everything as enemy air raids can occur easily. Kucinich also gives his own statistic from his own in-depth research, relaying the bombs “kill[ed] an estimated 200,000 and injur[ed] another 100,000.” (Kucinich 1). Kucinich has spent years researching the bombings of Japan and has concluded nearly 300,000 civilian casualties occurred from the bombings America did on Japan. Atomic bombs or not only dangerous to humans directly, however. It strongly impacts the land and world around …show more content…
For example, others feel that the nukes dropped on Japan were necessary to finishing the war before millions of japanese were killed. One common piece of evidence opposer's use is the Joint Chief Staff in April 1945 “estimat[ing] of 1,200,000 casualties, with 267,000 fatalities” (historyonthenet). However, the atomic bomb killed nearly 300,000 civilians, according to multiple sources, the bombings killed more civilians than both countries armies combined. President Truman’s famous statistic of 300,000 to 500,000 american men would have been killed in the invasion of Japan. However, according to the New York Times this statistic was completely “false and grossly oversimplified” (NYT). Again, proving that all the bombings did was kill over 300,000 civilians a few days before the Soviets joined which would have led to Japan’s surrender anyways due to the sheer power of the
By July 1945, it was clear that Japan had been weakened by violent attacks, but there was no indication of any weakening of their determination to fight. In addition, the total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated to be close to 5,000,000 men, which posed an even greater threat to the United States (Blanche M. Touhill, 452). In order to end the war and bring down this large, determined army, the Potsdam Declaration was created. This ultimatum was designed to “spare the Japanese people from utter destruction”, as said by Truman (Kevin B., 605). This rejection shows that the Japanese army and government were aware of the possible dangers of the continuation of war and their choice to decline to surrender.
One reason, they argue atomic bomb should not have been used is, of the many people that were killed by the bomb, many were Japanese women, children and elder. They were innocent people, who were not involved in the war. Another reason experts disagree with Truman is it is said that Japan was ready to surrender. They believe Japan was "on their knees" and the bomb was unnecessary. (ushistory.org) Experts say the bombing was racist.
“I was informed that such operations might be expected to cost over a million casualties, to American forces alone” (Document A). In addition, if American did not bomb Japan, then there will be more American casualties. With using the bomb, it help to insure that there will be less American casualties. “Others emphasize the opportunity of saving American lives by immediate military use, and believe that such use will improve the international prospects, in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon” (Document G). Hence with uses of the bomb, it help to insure that there will be less American
“Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people” (Dr. Daniel McIntosh). In the press release announcing the dropping of the atomic bomb Truman made a statement that would strongly support the dropping of the bomb. He states, “We have used it to shorten the agony of the war, in order to save the lives of thousands of young Americans.” World War 2 was an agonizing war that America helped. On Top of saving American lives, lives of all nationalities were saved with the end of the
“The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war.(Doc 3)” Although the Japanese were struggling and close to having to surrender there was no telling how long it would take. The bomb struck them one final time which left them with no choice but to surrender immediately. No one was impunity. “For Americans in uniform and those who waited for them to come home, outrageous as this might appear from the moral heights of hindsight, it was a sunburst of deliverance.(Doc 5)”
In their article, Document 4, Japan's largest and oldest English-language daily newspaper, Nippon Times, revealed that the United States had caused unnecessary deaths, basically going against an international war law. Nippon Times states in their article in 1945, “What meaning is there in any international law, in any rule of human conduct, in any concept of right and wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do?¨ The essence of Nippon Times argument is that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is against the International War Laws that state the unnecessary suffering of people in a conflicted war. The United States, according to Japan, broke a law of war that should be respected and followed as it helps to maintain some humanity in armed conflicts, saving lives and reducing suffering. This example shows that the dropping of the atomic bomb wasn't a military necessity. Additionally in Document 4, Nippon Times responds by claiming “… if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do?” which implies that the U.S. planned to threaten Japan to bomb them.
However, it is also true that the bombs led to Japan’s surrender, saving countless lives that would have been lost in a land invasion or continued war. Critics may say that Truman’s decision was unnecessary, as Japan was already on the brink of surrender. However, this argument ignores the fact that Japan had not officially surrendered and there was a significant resistance within the Japanese military to surrender. It also fails to consider the potential consequences of a land invasion, which would have been devastating for both American and Japanese forces. In other words, Truman’s decision to drop the bombs was also criticized for its humanitarian consequences.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.
Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and
The atomic bomb killed thousands of people in Japan instantly. That’s why Admiral William Leahy, the Chairman of the Joint Chief and Staff, opposed
Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and
Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is
President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.
However what these sceptics don 't realize is that the use of the atomic bomb not only helped end the war, but facilitated the dominance of the United States that the Japanese finally gave in to. In the section titled, NOTES OF THE INTERIM