“There is no revenge so complete as forgiveness.” says war veteran John Billings. Revenge is the desire to repay an injury by inflicting harm and hatred is the deep, negative thought that may lead to it. Hurting or harming other humans in today’s society is not allowed. Revenge has the reputation of being barbaric, short-sighted and a pointless instinct. It is an aspect of our human makeup that we must resist. It is an example of man’s complete and utter capacity for abstract thought. Society should be against hatred and revenge because it causes violence and chaos and is inevitably a destructive motive for actions. When we act out of revenge, revenge is what we will receive in return. This was the reason behind the 9/11 attacks on the …show more content…
Even in the distant past, there were laws that prevented revenge in common society. The codes of Hammurabi is a good example. It is one of the earliest and most complete ancient legal codes that was proclaimed by the Babylonian king, Hammurabi. His code is a collection of 282 laws and standards, stipulated rules for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice. The expository titled, “The Avalon Project: Code of Hammurabi” states a few of the Hammurabi codes and laws. It is written that, “If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.” This is a good law because it stops the victim from having hatred on his attacker and not acting out of revenge to try and inflict more harm that was dealt on himself. It protects the people and less people are killed. When someone or a group acts out of revenge, the ending is usually far worse than how it started. For example, that visual image by Rob Rogers shows me that even the U.S. citizens felt that the nuclear bomb in Hiroshima, Japan was too much and not called for. After the Pearl Harbor bombing, the U.S. wanted revenge on Japan so they unleashed a nuclear bomb which killed millions more in Japan compared to the casualties in Pearl Harbor.
The book To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee shows many examples of why revenge and hatred should never be justified. First of all, Bob Ewell is a great example of why you must control your
…show more content…
He feels hatred towards him because he defended a black man in court. Atticus says to his son, “ There’s a lot of ugly things in this world, son. I wish I could keep ‘em all away from you. That’s never possible.” Author, Harper Lee writes this to show that hatred is a common thing in society but you must keep that emotion to yourself. Additionally, Bob Ewell’s hatred towards Atticus grew, as the book went on. He got so sick and tired of him and wanted revenge. Atticus explains that, “So if spitting at my face and threatening me saved Mayella Ewell one extra beating, that’s something I’ll gladly take.” Harper Lee describes that Bob Ewell was so full of hatred that he would beat up anyone he disliked. Towards the end of the novel. Bob couldn’t control his hatred any longer so, in revenge he tries to kill Atticus’ children. But a young hero named Boo Radley sees them being attacked and kills Bob with his own
If someone gets hanged to a wall for robbing a house it’s very unlikely that someone may do that again. Hanging someone to a wall might be a bit gruesome but it puts fear in other robbers. Also it puts fear into civilians so they are not gonna do it again. Another piece of evidence from Document E law 196, says, If a man has knocked out the eye of a free man, his eyes shall be knocked out.”. This shows that if someone gets their eye taken out there probably not gonna take someone else's eye out.
After Atticus was spit on by Bob Ewell earlier in the novel, he still believed that they did not “‘have anything to fear from Bob Ewell, he got it all out of his system that morning’” (293). His trust in humanity left him vulnerable to an attack from Bob Ewell, who took advantage of Atticus’s good nature and went after his children. Unbeknownst to Jem and Scout, their guardian Arthur Radley, leaped to their rescue, causing a struggle between Bob Ewell and the victims. Finally, the brawl ended with Bob Ewell left dead.
Also, Hammurabi’s kingdom was always had a constant threat of being attacked, so there was no time for his own people to fight each other. Other people may say that not everyone was treated equally. However, in that society and time, free men were more important that slaves, and had more rights. The three examples shown above: family law, property law, and personal injury law, all clearly show that Hammurabi’s Code was just, and brought order and security to his
Sean Rielly Miss Moore Honors English II-2A 3 October 2015 Mockingbird "This morning Mr. Bob Ewell stopped Atticus on the post office corner, spat in his face, and told him he’d get him if it took the rest of his life."(221) After humiliating Bob Ewell in court, Atticus is threatened by Bob, the town shame, in an attempt to get some dignity back; after his daughter Mayella was allegedly raped by a negro Tom Robinson and Atticus tries to pin the abuse on Bob instead of Tom. Although since Tom is African American the jury voted him guilty and he gets the death penalty, even though most believed him to be innocent. By analyzing Harper Lee’s use of foreshadowing in To Kill a Mockingbird: Bob Ewell threatens Atticus and says he'll get him, Boo
In the novel, To kill a mockingbird, by harper lee, we follow our main characters as they witness their father, Atticus, having to defend a black man against a rape charged, against Bob Ewell and his daughter Mayella. Despite the evidence showing that Tom Robinson was innocent, they still choose to charge him as guilty. Thus the trial ends. However, it seems that Bob has a grudge against everyone apart from the trial, evidenced by him stalking Helen and trying to break into the judge’s house. During Halloween night, Bob tries to kill Jem and Scout, however they are saved by Arthur “boo” radley.
Bob does not just go on about his usual life instead he decides torment atticus. Bob starts off by spitting on Atticus. “I wish Bob wouldn't chew tobacco”(291). Atticus take the minor abuses because he knows if he was not on the receiving end someone else would be. These small moves of aggression quickly escalate when Bob tries to kill Jem and Scout.
Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.
According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of revenge is “to inflict injury in return for.” In To Kill a Mockingbird (TKAM) by Harper Lee, Scout, and Jem explore Civil Rights and racism in the segregated Maycomb, Alabama during the 1930s. Expressed through the eyes of 7-year-old, you learn about her father Atticus Finch, an attorney who desperately tries to prove the innocence of a black man falsely accused of rape; and about Boo Radley, a mysterious neighbor who saves Scout and Jem from being slaughtered by Bob Ewell. In the scene when Jem and Scout are attacked by Bob Ewell, Lee develops the theme, revenge brings consequences through external conflict, and symbolism. Seeking destructive revenge always creates a larger issue.
Revenge is a real thing in today’s society. It happens every day. There are different reasons for revenge from as small, as a small child stealing a stick of gum to a drug dealer murdering a nark. Regardless, taking revenge in itself may be for the greater good, or evil.
In "Long Way Down," author Jason Reynolds explores the devastating cycle of violence that hurts many communities. Will, the protagonist, showed us a exciting journey that highlights just how difficult it can be to break free from the vicious cycle of revenge and violence. The author shows this by telling us about how the characters were always told to get revenge, how easy it is to get pulled into the cycle, and that it makes people's vision/mind cloudy making them make bad decisions. The first quote that shows this theme is "No.3 Revenge if someone you love gets killed find the person and kill them.”
Is it justifiable to kill in order to get revenge and peace? The death of Matt and Ruth’s son, Frank altered their lives. Losing their son put them in a dark place taking an enormous toll over their profound emotions. The hatred for Richard Strout, grew stronger daily. The story “Killings” Author Andre Dubus displayed disputes with the values of compassion, courage, and fairness.
How would you feel if you had your hands chopped off? This can happen in Hammurabi’s code. If a son struck his father, his hand would be chopped off. Hammurabi ruled Babylon for 42 years. In the 38th year of his rule, Hammurabi had 282 laws carved on a large pillar like stone called stele.
Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird is about a man named Atticus and his two kids Jem and Scout. Atticus was appointed to defend an African American, named Tom Robinson. Tom was accused by Bob Ewell for raping and beating his daughter, Mayellea Ewell. During the trial scene, everyone in that courtroom finds outs the truth that Tom is innocent against the accusations from Bob. The truth is that Mayella kissed Tom and Bob saw what she did.
Revenge can be a horrible emotion; it can sometimes lead people to do horrible things. By definition, Revenge means to get retribution for a wrongdoing done to you. In my opinion, revenge is mostly caused by fear and the overwhelming feeling of payback Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and religions, and even the American culture. Though it often leads one to perform criminal acts, Howard argues that it is a necessary component in the functioning of society. He points out that revenge is a threat that acts as a disincentive to undeserved violence.
Hammurabi's code, a set of laws that ruled the people of Babylon. The Code worked as a legal version of revenge, "an eye for an eye". The Code ensured that if a person caught committing a crime would be punish for his crime. Some may argue that the code was barbaric, but the Babylonian's viewed it as the most efficient way to punish crimes.