Genetically modifying food is a relatively new method of enhancing plants as genes are transferred between organisms. Once the desired gene is identified in the organism’s genome, it can be cut out, transferred to the target plant, and pasted into its genome. Many authors have written about scientists who attempt to transform nature and its entities. For example, in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” organisms are modified throughout the respective stories. Essentially, the modification of each individual in the two works results in detrimental effects such as death and poisoning caused by toxic substances. Therefore, Hawthorne portrays scientists in a negative manner, since they continually alter organisms without …show more content…
For example, Aylmer’s concoction results in the death of his wife, Georgiana, as Aylmer is unable to control nature. In reality, however, scientists partially alter the environment as genetically modified foods create a sustainable way to feed the world. According to “the Birthmark,” Aylmer “was so startled with the intense glow of the birthmark upon the whiteness of her cheek that he could not restrain a strong convulsive shudder. His wife fainted” (181). Essentially, Aylmer shivers at the appearance of the birthmark on Georgiana’s cheek. The imperfection seems to startle him as he hopes to cleanse Georgiana of the blemish. Thus, Hawthorne perceives scientists as individuals who are not content with earthly imperfections as they will strive for flawlessness to the point of insanity. When Georgiana dies due to Aylmer’s obsessive nature over the birthmark, Hawthorne demonstrates why scientists are unable to control nature. Aylmer’s insanity and desire for perfection lead to Georgiana’s death as his concoction cannot derail the laws of nature. This contradicts many articles as scientists are creating a sustainable method to feed the world by genetically modifying food. Not only is it cheaper to grow GMO’s, but larger yields can be produced resulting in a billion dollar industry. Hawthorne’s belief that scientists dangerously attempt to attain perfection is clearly …show more content…
By genetically modifying foods, scientists are able to create products with better nutritional values, flavors, and textures. As stated in “Genetically Modified Foods,” “Regular rice is not very nutritious, so scientists have genetically modified rice plants.” The modified plants produce proteins that give rice additional iron and vitamins. Essentially, there are many benefits when particular crops are altered, which strongly contradicts Hawthorne’s view of scientists. In both “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter”, scientists attempt to control nature resulting in severe consequences. However, according to many sources individuals involved in biotechnology have produced crops with enhanced nutritional value and flavor. Throughout “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” it can be inferred that Rappaccini does not value human life and instead has a greater interest in his own experiments. According to Hawthorne, scientists show little warmth towards humans as Rappaccini poisons his daughter so she can
Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote many gothic short-stories related to the boundaries between nature versus science, and whether science should be used to change a person’s nature for the better. In the stories Heidegger’s Experiment and The Birthmark Hawthorne compares nature and science by having two scientists alter something in someone’s life. In many cases the stories claim that science is used to alter human nature tragically, and rarely used for good. Hawthorne supports this by showing two totally different examples in each of his stories. In the stories Heidegger’s Experiment and The Birthmark it is argued that science is used for the selfishness of those who wanted to alter human nature with science.
Some think of science as advantageous, while others believe it can be immoral. Acts of science can lead to manipulation of the natural world and cause those performing the experiments to “play God.” Nathaniel Hawthorne 's short stories “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment,” “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” and “The Birthmark” each incorporate characters that attempt to alter a natural aspect of life and in turn are met with failure. It is through his short stories that Nathaniel Hawthorne reveals opinion of science: Men should not engage in scientific studies that require them to act as God.
In the story “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, he uses several techniques to help build his story. Hawthorne tells a story of a man of science whose name was Aylmer. He married a beautiful women named Georgiana, although she was quite beautiful she had a birthmark on her face which, in Aylmer’s eyes was an imperfection. Aylmer tries to perfect Georgiana, but in the end Aylmer’s attempts to change Georgiana causes him to lose her. Aylmer does not accept the idea of imperfections in people.
All of mankind commits sin, even when they do not mean to. Nathaniel Hawthorne's works usually includes since, women, or religion. The stories The Birthmark, Rappaccini’s Daughter, and Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment by Mr. Hawthorne all include science. In The Birthmark a man is obsessed with ridding his wife of her “horrible” facial birthmark and ends up killing her in the process of trying to remove it. Rappaccini’s Daughter tells a tale of a man falling in love with a poisonous girl, when he give her the antidote to the poison she's made up of she dies.
Intro: Nathaniel Hawthorne’s fictional short story “The Birthmark” and The Twilight Zone’s darkly romantic episode “Eye of the Beholder” both use gothic elements and delve into the realm of science to explore concepts of beauty and perfection. Through their contrasting characterizations of the scientist and employments of irony and allusions, each work comes to its own conclusions about how to define and treat beauty. Body #1: The Birthmark From the very first paragraph, Hawthorne’s story revolves around Aylmer, a scientist who supposedly gives up his career to marry the beautiful woman of his dreams, Georgiana.
Archetypes are not intended to be either good or bad as its purpose is to group people by their behaviors. A god complex usually implies that a person is inconsiderate of others feelings, manipulation, and can lead them to the inability to take responsibility for any mistakes. Nathaniel Hawthorne depicts Aylmer, in “The Birthmark,” as an obsessive, egocentric, and power hungry man who commands his wife to adhere to his scientific scrutiny in order for him to achieve his image of perfection. Aylmer’s god complex recognizes Nature’s mistakes and considers them as future projects for him to fix. Although the knowledge of Aylmer’s distaste for the birthmark was known, it is made more obvious as he thinks that Georgiana was made “nearly perfect” by Nature, but could be improved upon by the removal of her “imperfection.”
“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from
Readers understand Georgiana’s perception of the laboratory when she declares: “The atmosphere felt oppressively close, and was tainted with gaseous odors which had been tormented forth by the processes of science.” (Hawthorne 11). Georgiana is certainly not reassured by the appearance of Aylmer’s laboratory before the removal of her birthmark.
For years, the health and safety of genetically modified foods have been debated and researched by scientists, but the question still stands: should genetically modified foods be allowed for consumption? The process of genetic modification involves inserting a gene from bacteria or a virus into an organism where it would normally not be found. The purpose is to alter the genetic code in plants and animals to make them more productive or resistant to pests or farming techniques. Genetically modified organisms, more commonly known as GMOs, have been a controversial topic of debate for a number of reasons. The ethics behind genetically modified foods come into question due to an abundance of short and long-term effects from the process, many of which are still unknown today.
What do a tomato, soybean and a french fry have in common? They are all some of the most commonly genetically modified foods sold on the market today. By using the genetic information from one organism, and inserting or modifying it into another organism, scientists can make food crops stay fresher, grow bigger, and have the crops create their own pesticides. Nevertheless, the technology to modify genes has surpassed its practicality. Genetically modified foods need to be removed from everyday agriculture because of the threat they pose to human health, the environment, and the impact on global economy.
Hawthorne uses imagery sense of smell to get readers to imagine the scene, “When Georgiana recovered consciousness she found herself breathing an atmosphere of penetrating fragrance, the gentle potency of which had recalled her from her deathlike faintness” (Hawthorne). “The Birthmark” also creates irony with “Aminadab, the less inferior man to Aylmer is the one who speaks sensible to Aylmer by disclaiming that if Georgiana was his wife, he would not try to remove the birthmark” (“The Birthmark”). The figurative language helps enhance the story. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s meaning for the story was a man’s strive to perfection only caused the death of his wife. Aylmer was too focused on what perfect could be, and Georgiana blindly agrees with him and decides to remove the birthmark, despite never having a problem with it.
Aylmer believes that he can correct “what Nature left imperfect in her fairest work!” (4). Aylmer, who stands as a symbol for science, obsessively seeks to remove Georgiana’s birthmark and make her ideal. When mankind attempts to change nature in the pursuit of perfection, it never ends well as seen in Aylmer’s attempts at
Equally Aylmer and Dr. Rappiccini, both characters in Hawthorne’s works causes destruction of human life with selfish aims to perfect the woman of their choice. In the case of Aylmer’s love interest in science, just as with the case of Beatrice’s father, blinds him to the true beauty and humanity of the woman before him. Aylmer views Georgiana’s birthmark as a symbol of imperfection and tries to remove it. At the end of the story, Georgiana say, "My poor Aylmer," she repeated, with a more than human tenderness, "you have aimed loftily; you have done nobly. Do not repent that with so high and pure a feeling, you have rejected the best the earth could offer.
In the short story “The Birthmark”, Nathaniel Hawthorne writes about a scientist, his wife, and the unhealthy relationship they share. The story follows Aylmer, a scientist, who is determined to remove his wife Georgiana’s birthmark. One aspect of their unhealthy relationship is Georgiana’s sole dependance on Aylmer. Furthermore, Aylmer does not view Georgiana as his equal. Not only this, but Aylmer frequently belittles her, continuously pointing out her flaws, which drives her to do something dangerous.
In “The Birthmark”, Georgiana tells Aylmer of how she would drink poison if he were ever to instruct her to because she trusts his judgement (Hawthorne 16). Georgiana is rejecting all forms of reasoning in this statement for she knows well of what would happen to her if she were to drink poison, but because she trusts in his “deep science” she would drink it regardless (Hawthorne 8). Also, Eckstein states, “...science ‘has become religion not only for Aylmer but also for Georgina’”(511). The couple has become so reliant on the statistics of science that it has gotten to the point where it is having a negative effect on both of them. Georgina’s negative affect was that her faith in her husband’s science resulted in her ultimate death; according to Eckstein, Aylmer’s obsession made him “ unfit for human companionship”