Frontline: The Confessions
A Briefing on the Case
In 1997, four men were convicted of the rape and murder of Michelle Bosko. The four men were Joseph Dick, Daniel Williams, Eric Wilson, and Derek Tice. Detective Robert Ford alleged that the four U.S sailors were all guilty of the crime. One of the victim’s friends claimed that Daniel Williams was Michelle Bosko’s murderer. Based on the information provided by Bosko’s friend, Ford suspected that William was guilty. With that, the series of coercive interrogations led by detective Robert Ford began. Detective Ford began his interrogating with a label that Williams is the suspect. The psychological abuse he used led Williams to make a false confession. After closing the case, the DNA results
…show more content…
Even after Omar Ballard’s DNA matched the ones on the crime scene and he allegedly confessed, Ford refuted the accuracy of factual information. In the Frontline documentary, Omar Ballard kept saying that he raped and murdered Michelle Bosko alone and that the four suspects were not involved in the crime. However, the four suspects were coerced to state that they participated in the murder as well. However, Ballard later insisted that the four suspects lied because they were frightened. Though, there was a clear conflict of interest in the Norfolk Four case. Even after Omar Ballard was proven to be guilty with all the facts and evidence, Ford refused to admit that he wrongly convicted the four men of the crime. Swisher (2012) argued that the reason why some law enforcement officials deny that they wrongfully convicted someone is because there is, “a conflict between their duties to justice and their duty to themselves- their duty to seek the release of the innocent person and their interest in avoiding embarrassment and liability for themselves and their offices,” (p. 187). A possible explanation why Ford kept denying that he was wrong, maybe because he wanted to avoid embarrassment. In addition, Ford had a personal interest in not contradicting his previous work. He took seven men into custody, questioning them, in which he believed that all of them were guilty. If Ford …show more content…
The police usually keep track of all the suspects. Even though, many people think that this law is beneficial, some believe that it is not. In Norfolk Four case, Megan law served as a curse. Even though the four men were innocent, the four of them were required to register as sex offenders. However, the Frontline documentary discussed that all four suspects suffered from social stigmatization after they were released. Since Eric Wilson was released four years before the others, he explained in the documentary that he was not able to work because he was stigmatized as a predator. Evans and Cublits (2014) argued that “a criminal record makes it difficult to find and maintain housing, employment, and social relationships,” (p. 593). In addition, he and his wife also suffered from social isolation because the community had labeled Eric Wilson as a sex offender. Wilson’ wife explained that they had no friends and that when she was first in a relationship with him, people warned her that Wilson was under the sex offender registry. Evans and Cublits (2014) also explained that “ a sex offense conviction also makes it difficult for [Registered Sex Offenders] to form relationships, including friendship and romantic relationships, and many suffer disintegration of their current relationships especially with extended family members,” (p. 594). Accordingly, Wilson's wife explained that her family opposed
When the results from the testing came back, the DNA from the underwear proved Dennis as not being a suspect. A few months later investigators were able to locate a slide from the scene of the Ayer rape. The slide was sent to Orchid Cellmark for testing. When the results came back from the test on the slide, it proved that Maher did not sexuall assult the young woman.
The United States Supreme Court in the Packingham v. North Carolina first amendment case has ruled in favor of Lester Gerard Packingham. The state from now on may not bar social media access to registered sex offenders. The case’s build up dates back to 2002 when 21 year old college student Lester G. Packingham had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl. For involvement with a minor he received a 10-12 month sentence, but having never met problems with the law, the judge required him to go on a 24 month probation and register as a sex offender. Five years had passed and in 2008 North Carolina forbid any person on the sex offender list to use any type of social media.
I located the KPD Rape Case 15-27355 which identified a subject named Ricardo Oropeza-Quiroz (DOB 12-30-1993) as being contacted with Hicks. It was also determined that Oropeza-Quiroz was an involved party in KPD Hit and Run Case 15-22411. In the Rape case, Hicks and Oropeza-Quiroz were people of interest. That case is still under investigation.
Bennett Barbour was a 22-year-old handyman that was falsely accused of rape to a 19-year-old college student from the College of William and Mary in 1978. The victim was raped while the assailant had a gun to commit a crime, after the incident, the victim called the police and described the rapist as a 145 pound 5’6” tall man (Barbour, 2012). A week later the victim was at a police station and shown different pictures of the person she thought assaulted her, she pointed-out Barbour’s picture and again during two lineups. After, he was arrested and sent to trial. Barbour weighed 115 pounds had a brittle bone disease and had a pin in his elbow, making it impossible to rape anyone (Barbour, 2012).
Ellie Meriggioli Amendment 8 Wisconsin State Journal, “Marcellus Williams Didn’t Die but Others Will,” August 28, 2017, page A9. This article is about a man named Marcellus Williams. Marcellus was supposed to be pumped with poison and die. But just hours before planned death penalty the governor of Missouri, Eric Greitens called it off to review his case again. Marcellus was on trial for the murder of Lisha.
An absurd amount of innocent people in the nation, have fallen victim to a disorganized legal system, and are suffering because of it. Dennis Brown, and James Harden, are two examples of this, and can relate because of it. They’ve been falsely convicted, without DNA evidence, but the truth of the case is finally revealed with their release. Dennis Brown, a black male from Louisiana, has been one of many people that have been wrongfully convicted without proper DNA evidence. First off, he’s been falsely convicted of rape and burglary.
To have a law passed under the name of a victim is world-wide changing, as the terrible acts could be restored into the criminal justice system today. Although, the circumstance of any law passed by legislation is too hard to understand why would anyone want to commit such a horrific crime, the answers, we may never know. As many Americans may remember it, the world stopped on July 15, 2008 as people heard across the nation on the news, radio, and perhaps social media. A two-year old little girl from Orlando Florida was missing, and her name was Caylee Marie Anthony. Casey Marie Anthony gave birth to Caylee on August 9, 2005 in Orlando Florida.
The FBI began to scrutinize suspects who could have possibly committed the crime. Robert Chambliss was convicted in 1977 for murder because of how he had taken part in the church bombing. Thomas Edwin Blanton was also convicted for his role in this crime, in 2001, because of murder. Bobby Frank Cherry was convicted in 2002 for his role in the church bombing which was murder. Herman Frank Cash was not convicted, but authorities believed he played the part of the fourth conspirator in this
Additionally, California has a law that allows citizens access to a CD-ROM with detailed information on sex offenders living in the state. The Pam Lyncher Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act, signed into law by President Clinton in 1996, called for a national registry of sex offenders, which allows state officials to submit queries and determine whether a job applicant at a day-care center is a registered sex offender in any of the participating states. Overall, communities have the right to be informed about the presence of sex offenders and take measures to protect themselves, such as avoiding contact with the offender or limiting their access to certain areas. However, it's worth noting that some states have more stringent laws than others when it comes to community notification and that the effectiveness of such laws in reducing the risk of recidivism among sex offenders remains a topic of
Furthermore, this leaves room for states to implement their own practices and ways to address status offenders. It has also been argued that the Act “fractured the juvenile justice system so that officials in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare handled white, middle-income youth” (Hinton, 2015, p. 816). Programs which labeled white youths as “children in trouble” marked minority youths as “chronic offenders” who were deemed a danger to society, and tried as an adult. The exceptions and revisions that have been made to the Act make it possible for repeat status offenders to be detained in secure
Innocence is is a lack of guilt, with respect to any kind of crime, or wrongdoing. In a legal context, innocence refers to the lack of legal guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime. Being convicted of a crime and found not guilty later on can frustrate the convict and the convict’s family as the time spent behind bars, is time they will never get back. James Richardson was convicted and charged for murder and rape in Cross Lanes, West Virginia on May 18, 1989. First, Richardson noticed the neighbor’s house burning.
In America today it is hard for certain families to make a living and to keep a job. College is very expensive and not many people can afford to go to college. And when it comes to finding a job that pays enough to support a family and gives you the hours you want so that you can still spend time with your family is nearly impossible. Family time is very important to sustain a healthy, strong relationship with all the members of your family.
Should Sex Offenders Name be Public? It is debatable if sex offenders names should be public, some people believe is a invasion of there private life, “There is a real danger of vigilantism and publicizing their names (and the info required goes far beyond just their names) is an invasion of privacy of the wives, children and families of these offenders, which is an invasion of privacy no other class of criminal faces”(debate.org) . Others believe this is not even debatable, that Sex offenders name should be public, period, “Once somebody commits a sexual crime, they have given up their right to anonymity.
Summary: In 1983 a young 11-year-old girl, Sabrina Buie, was found in a soybean field in a rural area of Red Springs, NC. She had been raped and murdered. There was no physical evidence as to who committed the crime. However, suspicion was cast upon two half-brothers, Henry Lee McCollum, 19, and Leon Brown, 15, who had recently moved to the area from New Jersey and were considered outsiders.
Many ask should offenders have the right to live near schools, parks or daycares after serving their time for the offense. This is one of the most emotionally debated issues in criminal law today. How to manage the risk of sexual offenders being rehabilitated back into the community? “Beyond mandatory registration and community notification, over a dozen states have enacted residency restrictions that forbid sex offenders from living within a certain distance of schools, parks, day care centers, or even places where children normally congregate.” said Durling. Author Caleb Durling conducts a research to discuss his opinion how the law should modified.