Daisy Guzman
Mr.Glorfield
English 11A
16 December 2022
Changes
The crucible by playwright Arthur Miller had many changes added, however were these changes necessary? They absolutely were necessary because they captivated the reader by making things more interesting. Related to events occurring at the time that were important. And helped form a tellable story. To recap the changes made in the crucible were necessary because they captivated the reader, related to occurring at the time, and helped form a tellable story.
The crucible needed changes to captivate the reader. Some changes such as the romance between Abigal and Procter were added to make the play more interesting to modern audiences. If there had been no romance, there
…show more content…
The crucible was written during the red scare when the U.S. feared communism many were questioned and imprisoned based on them being communist spies or supporters. Arthur Miller himself was questioned and imprisoned based on him being a supporter of communism. This changed and altered the way he wrote the play to give notice to the situation around him. For example, Hale left and only later came back to help the convicted. This represents all the people who questioned the situation around them but did nothing to help. Abigail was one of the antagonists of the crucible, she does many awful things such as threats and with the help of the other girls ruins many lives. She and the girls represent Mcarthy and his team who ruined many lives and were very harsh in their strategies and investigations. Finally, the whole of the people doing cruel and insane things due to fear, and the exact same thing occurring during the red scare where neighbors would call the authorities on each other and such. The red scare and crucible are very similar in how things are handled, and many are on …show more content…
The Salem witch trials is an interesting event but not very tellable as a play. The first example is somewhat for a tellable story, but more for the time it was written. In real life Procter was 60 and Abigail was only 11 this would be very unpalatable to the audiences, so it was changed to a much smaller age gap. Also, to not confuse Ann Putnam jr. with her mom Ann Putnam sr. he changed her first name to ruth. He also changed John Procter's life to make him more likable as the protagonist by changing the fact that Elizabeth was his third wife not his first as well as that his sons were older 17 and 33, he also had a 15-year-old daughter. These changes helped make the story clearer and
He had an affair with his maidservant who was named Abigail Williams. Proctor had been struggling with his feelings for Abigail for a while, and eventually gave into his lust, and committed adultery. His wife found out, and immediately fired Abigail from her position within the Proctor’s home. Elizabeth Proctor, John’s wife states in Act 3, “I came to think he fancied her”(Miller 1208). This all happened before Act 1 of The Crucible.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible was written when Joseph R. McCarthy sprung forward with a list of so-called communists in our government. This was an action that helped create the red scare throughout america, in which many would be accused of communism with little proof. Miller showed that by writing what's seen as a metaphor for a modern day witch hunt. His story gives us a good chance to know the characters with rich text allowing deeper analyzation of them. Many become personally affected in which we can see following each ACT.
The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller based on real events, but Miller adds to the play for good reason. Miller adds love, hatred and revenge into a factor of why the trails happened. To show love can move someone to do anything, to show hatred can ruin a good mans name, and to show even if a person did nothing wrong, revenge could be reason to accuse and change their life. In real life, John Proctor is known as a successful farmer, but known as a mean man. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays Proctor as a “Good and righteous man” (Miller 221).
The Crucible represents Arthur Millers own life experiences with the Red Scare. “Are You Now or Were You Ever?” was about McCarthyism, it was written in the 1950’s and was called the Red Scare. During the Red Scare people were being accused of being communist, at this time they didn’t get killed if they were accused. Instead of getting killed, the people were put into jail for their accusations. This period was a terrible time for the people that got accused for things that they didn’t have anything to do with.
The Crucible Essay John Lewis once said, “Live a life that is so honest, if someone said something bad about you, no one would believe it.” Building a certain reputation is a task most fail to acknowledge. Many elaborate through their actions the particular person they pursue to be known as, but many do the opposite. No matter if you’re unfamiliar to your attempts or fully aware, every one’s reputation is in their own hand’s to maneuver in the direction they strive to drive it in. In Arthur Miller’s, The Crucible, reputation is amongst the most important priority, aside from religion.
From the freedom snatching ways of McCarthyism and the “Red Scare” to his troubled marriage and lust for Monroe, everywhere there seemed to be parallels with the play and his life. Millers’ life poured into this story a bit with some of the characters and the way the characters acted and talked and that is how Arthur Miller, and the writing of the play gave us some insight into his life and some of the crazy and heart-breaking stuff Miller had to deal with at that time. McCarthyism led miller to write about this and it gave us a story so deep and thoughtful story for all to read and gave himself a great way to express himself, and that is how Arthur miller’s experiences in his life affected his writing of The Crucible such as his marriage, how he was treated during the “red scare”, and his
Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953. Arthur Miller wrote the play because he was inspired by McCarthyism. McCarthyism was the hunt for communists that was taken too far. In The Crucible he presented a universal message. He was comparing how communists did exist and witches did not, but yet they were both taken as serious.
The plot models a situation similar to a problem that existed during Miller’s lifetime. The play was written during the Red Scare, when people were being wrongly accused of spreading Communism throughout the United States. The Crucible
Its enduring importance lies in Miller's ability to address timeless themes that resonate with audiences of all eras. The Crucible has served as a source of inspiration for writers who continue to explore concepts such as truth, justice, and societal injustices. This play's lasting legacy has influenced the direction of drama and its potential for commenting on issues. Its relevance remains strong as it continues to inspire adaptations, revivals, and reinterpretations that tackle political concerns. By delving into the dynamics of power and challenging oppressive systems The Crucible exemplifies the power of art, in promoting critical thinking and driving societal
The issues it dealt with then are much the same as the issues we deal with now. The modern audience can still relate to the issue of corrupting power, or the struggle to uphold the conscience, the issue of society's 'rules' and our condemnation of those woof those who go beyond those 'rules', along with our inherent desire to 'blame someone else', because of this connection. As with many good plays, The Crucible has many timeless facets, which Miller has incorporated, and these can give us valuable insight into many of our own
The Crucible was written in 1952 by Arthur Miller, the play delivers many messages and carries many themes throughout. Nearly every character in the play is put to the test to display an act of courage, weakness, or truth. Some characters lack these traits and never learn to have courage or display honesty. However, most characters are very courageous and demonstrate these acts throughout the whole play. Overall the theme of the The Crucible boils down to being about honesty, weakness, and courage.
In The Crucible Abigail Williams was a seventeen-year-old girl who had the most responsibility for the Salem Witch Trials occurring. Abigail seemed to strive off of having power and control over other people. Abigail was motivated by accusing people of being witches and having a part in the mass hysteria in Salem. In order to protect herself from getting in trouble, she lied about other people which eventually caused the town to reject her; causing her to leave. Abigail’s main reason for lying during the Salem Witch Trials was to protect the secret affair she had going on with Procter.
Viewing The Crucible as a direct parallel to McCarthyism one could compare Abigail and Joseph McCarthy as similar factors. Abigail causes the town to turn against certain characters much like how McCarthy turns everyone against those 81 that he
“Character Analysis over The Crucible” Arthur Miller is a commonly-known playwright, most famous for his 1953 play, The Crucible. The basis for The Crucible came from the witch trials which occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during the puritan era. Miller even uses some of the same characters in his dramatized play that were a part of the original witch trials in Salem. However, Miller made a few alterations to the historical members of the Salem society in order to suit his dramatic purpose in The Crucible, particularly Abigail Williams, John Proctor, and Reverend Samuel Parris.
Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953, as a response to McCarthyism, which is, in general, accusing people of crimes with little to no proof. It ran rampant through the United States during the Second Red Scare through the early 1950s (exactly when Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible). In The Crucible, Miller juxtaposes the leaders, who rationally think for themselves, and the followers, who believe what everybody else believes, through irony, imagery, and denotation. The Crucible is riddled with irony, and Arthur Miller utilizes situational and dramatic irony to show the difference between followers and leaders.